Avatar feed
Responses: 6
1SG Steven Imerman
4
4
0
7700e6f4
As long as this effort does not include any more tons of palletized cash.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Melvin Brandenburg
SFC Melvin Brandenburg
4 y
If there is one thing we can count on, the appeasers in office will do just that. Iran is best contained by pressure not purchase.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Eugene Chu
LTC Eugene Chu
4 y
"A payout of roughly that amount did come from the U.S. treasury. It was to pay an old IOU.

In the 1970s, Iran paid the U.S. $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered because the government was overthrown and diplomatic relations ruptured. After the nuclear deal, the U.S. and Iran announced they had settled the matter..."

https://apnews.com/article/f53aeebcb0f64b76a2e2a54b2b002dad
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Steven Imerman
1SG Steven Imerman
4 y
LTC Eugene Chu - Nice try, but CASH is used to finance terrorism, drug trafficking, etc. Over the years I'm sure they came up with plausible sounding reasons, but the cash is a problem they cannot get around. The Iranians saw John Kerry coming and fucked him every which way they felt like.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jack Durish
3
3
0
How much is President Biden's "peace plan" going to cost? President Obama's cost a plane-load of cash and it didn't work very well...
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Eugene Chu
LTC Eugene Chu
4 y
True but mischaracterized

"A payout of roughly that amount did come from the U.S. treasury. It was to pay an old IOU.

In the 1970s, Iran (under the Shah) paid the U.S. $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered because the government was overthrown and diplomatic relations ruptured. After the nuclear deal, the U.S. and Iran announced they had settled the matter..."

https://apnews.com/article/f53aeebcb0f64b76a2e2a54b2b002dad
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Environmental Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
4 y
Well lets see let's start by sending them another 10 or 12 billion in cash so they can finance more terror groups against neighboring countries they don't like.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
4 y
LTC Eugene Chu - Yes, we all know about the "release of impounded funds." And yes, of course AP claim it was "mischaracterized". I don't agree with the AP "fact checkers". It's their opinion against mine. I'm sure you'll weight theirs higher than mine. Go ahead. Doesn't bother me. The "fact" is that President Obama didn't have to release those funds. Several President ahead of him didn't see fit to release them. So, the question is, why did he choose to release them? Out of the goodness of his heart or because he expected a quid pro quo? If a quid pro quo, what was he expecting? We may never know (unless, of course, you choose to believe him - I don't). More importantly, what did we actually get by virtue of his "generosity"? We got Americans killed...
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
SSG Robert Mark Odom I Sure Hope So! The Previous Administration Pretty Well Screwed the Pooch on what Took Several Administrations to Set Up.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close