Congress
Congress
7
7
0
No surprises here. This seemed like and open and shut case.
Bannon Found Guilty of Obstructing Jan. 6 Probe
Posted from news.yahoo.com
Crime
Congress
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 3
3
3
0
SPC Kevin Ford
"What happened in the Steve Bannon contempt trial?
After just three hours of deliberating behind closed doors on Friday, a jury in the nation’s capital found Steve Bannon guilty of contempt of Congress. Bannon, who was on trial this week for contempt of Congress over his decision to ignore subpoenas related to the Jan. 6 Committee, had promised a fiery trial that would embarrass the government."
"What happened in the Steve Bannon contempt trial?
After just three hours of deliberating behind closed doors on Friday, a jury in the nation’s capital found Steve Bannon guilty of contempt of Congress. Bannon, who was on trial this week for contempt of Congress over his decision to ignore subpoenas related to the Jan. 6 Committee, had promised a fiery trial that would embarrass the government."
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
Another false headline.
Yes, he was found guilty. Of CONTEMPT. Not of obstruction. Two COMPLETELY different charges.
You can argue that the reason he was contemptuous is that he was obstructing. And it would be a fair argument. But that isn't what he was found guilty of. And it is a bit more difficult to prove.
This goes beyond misleading, it is actually untruthful. And intentionally written to pander to the leftist MSM overlords. I could just as easily - and more accurately - write the headline "Bannon Not Found Guilty of Obstructing Jan.6 Probe" to pander to the right.
Further, it is stupid! Just write "Bannon found guilty." You get your left-wing pander points AND you drive more clicks as people want to find out what he was guilty of.
Yes, he was found guilty. Of CONTEMPT. Not of obstruction. Two COMPLETELY different charges.
You can argue that the reason he was contemptuous is that he was obstructing. And it would be a fair argument. But that isn't what he was found guilty of. And it is a bit more difficult to prove.
This goes beyond misleading, it is actually untruthful. And intentionally written to pander to the leftist MSM overlords. I could just as easily - and more accurately - write the headline "Bannon Not Found Guilty of Obstructing Jan.6 Probe" to pander to the right.
Further, it is stupid! Just write "Bannon found guilty." You get your left-wing pander points AND you drive more clicks as people want to find out what he was guilty of.
(2)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SPC Kevin Ford I love BS semantic arguments.. let's go over how water is wet next...
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SFC Casey O'Mally there is no reason to argue his semantic argument... The meaning of words is irrelevant
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SPC Kevin Ford no one cares... We are talking about Bannon telling Congress to shove the subpoena up thier ass... That's the issue Bannon being rude to the court...
(0)
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
SFC Casey O'Mally unless files a defamation suit against yahoo news... None of this matters because neither of you arguments have any material stake in the parties involved... It doesn't matter what the article says or the definitions you make unless you have the power to get a judgement against the newspaper that wrote it.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
And what happens now... He was just on tucker telling his enemies to suck it...
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google