Posted on Dec 23, 2019
LTC Jason Strickland
9.35K
120
29
3
3
0
Many of us have likely heard from employers that they cannot compete with military pay and benefits. We've also seen examples where people can get out of service and make a much higher salary than the military pays. However, service members face demands and work hours the majority of civilians do not and the hours worked broken down sometimes do not even equal out to minimum wage.
What say you, RallyPoint community?
Read this article before you vote/answer:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/military-member-pay-rand-arroyo-center
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 17
SSgt Terry P.
10
10
0
LTC Jason Strickland You can not compare apples and oranges,other than they are both fruit.The duties and requirements of SM's can not be compared to most civilians even when the job titles are similar.
(10)
Comment
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
LTC Jason Mackay
>1 y
LTC Jason Strickland and SSgt Terry P. I too believe this has ALWAYS been an apples to lawnchairs type comparison. Pay is also a narrow view of compensation. 30 "vacation days" per year and not accounting for minutes and individual hours in 30 minute increments in the "workplace" is pretty nice and few civilian organizations can measure up to that. But we don't pay OT, but do have separation pay. Until Walmart offers closing with and destroying the enemy in close combat as a service, comparisons are only anecdotal. The fact that we have a federally mandated pay grade system that essentially ignores individual branches, MOS, AFSC, and the like makes it even more absurd.

Further, the application of health care To the SM as a component of compensation is contaminated by government interest in your deployability and readiness. If you get sick or out of shape whilst employed by Schmuckatelli County School District, so what? It is of unique Government Interest as a service member. The confluence of pay and allowances further convolute the issue. Further, the retirement system, less so under the blended system, remains a retainer for you to be available for recall, usually not a feature of a civilian retirement system as a compulsory and regulatory matter, though some. Feature a retired annuitant type aspect to temporarily "ask" for people to help solve underlaps and programmed absences (like medical leaves, FMLA, post partum leave etc). The annuitant can simply say, nah.

There is also the aspect of lost economic opportunity of spouse income that isn't really addressed anywhere, whether officer, NCO, or enlisted.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT Robert Pryor
SGT Robert Pryor
>1 y
I certainly can't speak for the rest of the country, but I live in the Dallas Ft. Worth Metroplex, with a relatively low cost of living. I just checked and starting salary at the closest In-N-Out Burger to my house is $12 per hour for a 16 year-old, which works out to about $2,080 per year. By comparison, an E-3 under two makes about that, but certainly gets a lot of other benefits. From a USA Today article, "But In-N-Out, the cult favorite fast food chain, sees its store managers earning over $160,000 on average." And that is without a college degree.

Just food for thought, the next time you have that old In-N-Out urge.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
LTC Jason Mackay
>1 y
SGT Robert Pryor - you mean an In n out full time employee works 2080 hours per year (40 hrs week x 52 weeks per year) at $12/hr which is $24,960 gross before taxes, yes an E3 under two years will make a hair more than that at $25260 gross before taxes minus special pay, allowances, and pay in kind like a meal card and lodging. And independent of a 40 hrs week or a 168 hrs week.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Robert Pryor
SGT Robert Pryor
>1 y
LTC Jason Mackay - Yep, I was mixing yearly salary and annual salary -- sorry. The bottom line is, how long does someone without any college have to serve in the military until their annual salary reaches $160K? And unless the In-N-Out employee works in Southern California, they probably rarely get shot at on the job. In-N-Out does have some great employee benefits, such as a 401k. They pay far better than the rest of the industry as a means of reducing employee turnover. I believe that I read an article about a week or two ago saying Glassdoor had them rated one of the best employers in the USA -- maybe fourth. I still say someone in the military should be paid far more than a burger flipper at In-N-Out.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
8
8
0
I do not feel that SMs are paid too much. In comparison to certain amenities (barracks, chow halls, etc.), I can see where some feel we are....but I honestly do not feel we are overpaid. There is a reason why we are paid a salary instead of hourly. 18 hour TOC duty would totally eat up into the overtime pay civilians get. We have long, arduous hours. We get shot at. What I think should happen is these new/very young SMs coming in should receive an in depth financial awareness and budgeting classes to manage their monies better.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Michael Smith
7
7
0
I was in for 22 years and never felt poor or broke. I think that it is a question of money management and lifestyle. Sure your first four years or so are going to be tight --just like every other normal person in the work force. But once you start collecting BAH/BAS and make a couple of ranks, you should be doing fine. The people in the military who are struggling and most often special cases (like 6 kids) or not living within their means.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close