Avatar feed
Responses: 11
PO2 Robert Aitchison
4
4
0
Based on the article sounds like she was just a bad marine who is now trying to use her religion as a shield against the consequences.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
SFC (Join to see)
8 y
Or the religion part was what lead to the other charges.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Security Business Analyst
MSgt (Join to see)
8 y
It was not her First Charge.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
2
2
0
You can't post bible verses but you can wear a turban or head scarf. Military needs to get set one standard. All or none and leave it at that.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Supply Sergeant (S4)
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
The Court-martial listed "various offenses relating to separate incidents -- including disrespecting a superior officer, disobeying lawful orders and failing to report to an assigned duty".
If I had to guess I would say there was contention before and the choice of "No weapon formed against thee shall prosper." was a passive-aggressive shot at her supervisor.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Security Business Analyst
MSgt (Join to see)
8 y
She was a Pile. She refused to conform to Standards and paid for it. She had a history of disrespect and dereliction of duty. It sounds more like this was just an added charge to prove she was a Pile. She, in turn, focused on this single charge and tried to over shadow her substandard career. They could have taken this charge away and she would still be where she is today.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
1
1
0
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close