Posted on May 3, 2019
Gun Control Is A Myth: The Second Amendment Stands Strong Or Not At All - Part 1
1.16K
33
10
12
12
0
Some knowledge can't be reiterated enough. Socialism s a wonderful concept, it has just never worked out in practice. We(the U.S.) won't be able to realize the socialist dream either. We already have a politburo, those that deem themselves more equal than others, waiting in the wings whose past actions have shown, to anyone that would look with a critical eye, how they really feel about the multiple ethnicities, and religious beliefs that make up this country.
TSgt David L.,Lt Col Charlie Brown,
SSG Diane R., SPC Margaret Higgins,
CPT Jack Durish, Cpl Jeff N.,
LTC Charles Blake,SGT (Join to see),
SPC Gary Welch,Maj Robert Thornton,
CPL Douglas Chrysler,Maj Marty Hogan,
LTC (Join to see),LT Brad McInnis,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi,
PO1 John Johnson,MSgt David Hoffman,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, CW5 Jack Cardwell,
TSgt David L.,Lt Col Charlie Brown,
SSG Diane R., SPC Margaret Higgins,
CPT Jack Durish, Cpl Jeff N.,
LTC Charles Blake,SGT (Join to see),
SPC Gary Welch,Maj Robert Thornton,
CPL Douglas Chrysler,Maj Marty Hogan,
LTC (Join to see),LT Brad McInnis,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi,
PO1 John Johnson,MSgt David Hoffman,
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, CW5 Jack Cardwell,
Gun Control Is A Myth: The Second Amendment Stands Strong Or Not At All - Part 1
Posted from ammoland.com
Gun Control
2nd Amendment
Firearms and Guns
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 7
5
5
0
4
4
0
Every time the left the talks about 'reasonable' gun control, they mean restricting the 2nd Amendment. Each time a shooting incident occurs, the left blames legal gun owning citizens, not the criminals who obtained the guns. They don't bother to discuss how the new 'reasonable' regulation would not have changed the outcome. Removing guns from legal gun owning citizens, especially in rural areas, will just mean more criminals using guns against unarmed citizens.
(4)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
Most, if not all the recent mass shootings, lone wolf attackers, etc. have been carefully scripted actions that were designed to elicit the strongest feelings against the tool(s) of the attacker(s), with ready-to-go legislation waiting to be implemented the following day.
Events like Sandy Hook (Hoax), the L.A. Airport "attack," the Boston Marathon "bombing," the Las Vegas hotel shooter, Parkland school, etc. were all scripted and rehearsed actions, complete with Crisis Actors, gallons of fake blood, and mysterious enablers who disappear once the action begins. I am NOT saying people didn't get hurt or killed in some of these actions; what I AM saying is that these actions planned for it and USE bodies as podiums upon which to blather on about how guns are somehow "evil." How can lifeless objects be "evil?" Can a hammer be evil? What about a car? (Yes I've seen the Steven King movie "Christine.") It all boils down to the intent of the user of the tool.
Democrats and their minions of anti-2nd Amendment activists fear the will of the American People, and history has proven that when a government pisses off armed people, the people in the government usually end up in a bad way. History has also proven that a disarmed populace will load themselves on railcars to be shipped to deathcamps to be worked, tortured, and eventually executed. This is what the democrats want. They want a subservient populace unable to assert their own rights to existence. This is why there is an Anti-2nd Amendment/Firearms lobby. Power-- unchallenged power over everyone not in the (ruling) political class. It's NOT about "saving lives" (just see their stance on post-birth abortion) but about gaining and keeping POWER.
They must be stopped before they can achieve their goal.
Events like Sandy Hook (Hoax), the L.A. Airport "attack," the Boston Marathon "bombing," the Las Vegas hotel shooter, Parkland school, etc. were all scripted and rehearsed actions, complete with Crisis Actors, gallons of fake blood, and mysterious enablers who disappear once the action begins. I am NOT saying people didn't get hurt or killed in some of these actions; what I AM saying is that these actions planned for it and USE bodies as podiums upon which to blather on about how guns are somehow "evil." How can lifeless objects be "evil?" Can a hammer be evil? What about a car? (Yes I've seen the Steven King movie "Christine.") It all boils down to the intent of the user of the tool.
Democrats and their minions of anti-2nd Amendment activists fear the will of the American People, and history has proven that when a government pisses off armed people, the people in the government usually end up in a bad way. History has also proven that a disarmed populace will load themselves on railcars to be shipped to deathcamps to be worked, tortured, and eventually executed. This is what the democrats want. They want a subservient populace unable to assert their own rights to existence. This is why there is an Anti-2nd Amendment/Firearms lobby. Power-- unchallenged power over everyone not in the (ruling) political class. It's NOT about "saving lives" (just see their stance on post-birth abortion) but about gaining and keeping POWER.
They must be stopped before they can achieve their goal.
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
SSG(P) (Join to see) - I will agree that the timing and perpetrators of some of the latest "terror" attacks are very suspect. Since most the perps end up dead on the scene, it makes it very hard to get good intel. I, however, am not going to get as deep into the conspiracy theory as Your comment goes.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google