Posted on Nov 3, 2016
CPT Current Operations Officer (J33)
18.9K
7
8
3
3
0
I think that the purpose of federal recognition was important in the past, especially when the National Guard was an organization run very differently from active duty.

But now that schooling is centralized and the Guard, in structure, parallels active duty, is there a reason why federal recognition still exists?
Posted in these groups: Star PromotionsUSARNG
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 6
CPT Michael Ludwick
2
2
0
I don't necessarily disagree with the idea of the fedrec process, however my main concern is the length of time to get through. Currently I'm awaiting to be recognized to Captain. It's been eight months since my packet was submitted and comparing myself to others before me, I'll likely have to wait another four months before I get pinned. All-in-all, about a year of turnaround time.

From an outsider's perspective to the process, it seems like an inefficient system. I haven't been able to find any information out there as to what is actually being validated/confirmed. If anyone has more information I'd love to know. One would think that validating civ education, military schools, apft, ht/wt, and a background check would take at most a few weeks or months.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CW2 Cyber Warfare Technician
CW2 (Join to see)
7 y
Sir, I've heard similar stories as I'm going through the steps for WO right now. There has to be a more efficient manner in which we utilize new technology to make this happen. However, I do not hold much hope considering we can't centralize most administrative systems at this point
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Mohor
2
2
0
Oh heck yes there's a reason Federal recognition is still important! State GO's are still appointed by Governors. Politics play a role therefore as an additional check and balance it's good to keep it. I have a classmate that was retired from Active Duty Army as an 0-5 LTC. He's now been appointed as GAARNG as a 1 star General. In South Carolina the TAG is Elected. You really need to make sure they meet federal standards!
(2)
Comment
(0)
CPT Current Operations Officer (J33)
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Sir, I agree with GOs, but for most company and field grade officers, the standards remain the same. Officers complete the same BOLC, same civilian education requirements and have this undue length added to the promotion process.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Cyber Warfare Technician
0
0
0
Sir, to directly answer you, I believe the actual "process" is outdated, but I do not believe the concept is. I think we can make it significantly more efficient than it currently stands, but, I do believe it is a necessity. I would believe that much of our complaints rely around the inefficient timing of it all, not really about having to do it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close