Posted on Jul 10, 2015
SSG Izzy Abbass
1.47K
8
3
2
2
0
This post is kind of a follow up to the servant leadership post. I know the Army tried to drill into me that leaders are not born that way and the Army can train anyone to be a leader. That never sat right with me. While I do believe you can train people to be decent managers, anyone I've felt was a good leader seemed more to be born to lead than just trained. What do you think?
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 3
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
1
1
0
There's Talent, and there is Technique.
Some people are born with Talent. The military teaches Technique. In other words, some folks just "get it" more than others. They have inherent "vision" and (more) natural Leadership Potential, while others can be taught the fundamentals.

Leadership is an Art, but like most Arts, there is an "element" of Science to it. If you apply certain lessons, anyone can do it. Think of it like "paint by numbers."


So the reality is that it is more of a spectrum than a dichotomy. Someone with little natural talent, but lots of technique "may" end up a better leader than someone with lots of natural talent but little technique.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Seid Waddell
1
1
0
Good examples to pattern after help a good deal, but leadership comes from inside, IMHO.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt F-16, F-117, RQ-1, AND CV-22 AVIONIC SYSTEMS
1
1
0
It is a bit of both. Sometimes it is hidden and can be brought out. Training can only take you so far, after that you have to be able to use what you have. I have seen someone that can tell you engineering data on an aircraft but if you put a wrench in his hand he was useless. He had the training but did not have the talent. Good kid, Bad maintainer.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close