Posted on Jul 15, 2015
SFC Alehandra Philip
3.97K
6
7
3
3
0
Posted in these groups: Legal 6 LeaveParenting logo Parenting
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
1
1
0
I think whatever the policy is, it should be universal across the services. Having looked at what Hon Mabus has instituted, it is a slick policy and it makes sense. It combines Convalescence Leave, with permissive time, which does not have to be used concurrently over the first year of a child's life which I think will benefit both the service and the service member. We talk about maintaining the military family balance, as well as recruiting more women. This policy among many others he is instituting does that. The man is doing what he sets out to do and from what I can see the vast majority of it is just plain beneficial to the services.

As the USN/USMC are smaller than the Army, it allows things to be test-bedded and vetted for issues, and for things to be tweaked for the larger service.

I have a feeling this will be a running trend in the future. The smaller services will "try" things, and then the larger ones will adopt them as they work. That's just good policy.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Matthew Hakin
PO3 Matthew Hakin
9 y
The military's job is to defend our country. Whatever decision is made, it should be with that mission in mind. As long as the decision is in our country's best interest, then I'm fine with it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Regimental Chief Warrant Officer
1
1
0
Personally I believe that the use of a sabbatical is in order here. This allows family decisions such as having a new addition to be balanced with career decisions. It also allows the parent to decide how long they will dedicate their time. A counter argument may come into play when discussing the fact that when you leave on a sabbatical, you don't get paid. We all know that having children has its costs and this should also come into factoring the decision to expand said family.
I am thinking about this in a logical way while also knowing that my children were both 'surprises' (although my wife was a stay at home mom for the first 12 years)
Many European companies give a full year off with pay for maternity leave. Is that what we are moving towards? Will that affect readiness or promotion? At what point does it become non-rated time?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Alehandra Philip
SFC Alehandra Philip
9 y
You bring up good points Chief. Having a child is expensive. But for some pregnancy comes as a surprise. When I had my son, I had a C-Section. Recovery after a C-Section is a long process. In my opinion 6 weeks is just not enough time after child birth. Not saying that maternity leave should be a year, but i do think it should be longer than 6 weeks. 12 Weeks would suffice as well. Yes, you have to be able to balance your career with your family life, but sometimes it can prove to be very tough.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Stephen King
1
1
0
yes, I think it would be a good idea.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close