Posted on May 5, 2014
SGM Matthew Quick
157K
1.03K
245
26
26
0
The Army Service Ribbon (ASR) was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981 as announced in Department of the Army General Order 15, dated 10 October 1990. It is awarded to members of the U.S. Army for successful completion of initial entry training.

Enlisted Soldiers will be awarded this ribbon upon successful completion of their initial MOS producing course. For those enlisted Soldiers assigned a MOS based on civilian or other service acquired skills, this ribbon will be awarded on honorable completion of 4 months active service.
Posted in these groups: Us medals AwardsRibbons logo Ribbons
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 106
CPT Brad Wilson
1
1
0
I lean towards getting rid of it. Wearing the uniform and wearing your branch insignia shows you have met the standard of being a soldier. I also think we should have a ceremony pinning on that insignia upon completion of AIT and OBC and WOC. Marines are not addressed by their rank or by Marine until they graduate. They have a ceremony where they receive their Eagle Globe and Anchor instilling that pride of achievement that they are known for we should do the same I wore my Field Artillery Cannons my MS IV year as a Cadet and for the 3 months between my commissioning and the start of FAOBC. While I was proud to wear them I wasn’t a qualified Field Artillery Officer and shouldn’t have worn them until I graduated from FAOBC.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Public Affairs Broadcast Journalist
1
1
0
I think we have much larger issues to address. Plus, why detract from the first colorful addition to the uniform most Soldiers' parents will see?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Griscom
1
1
0
If you have the NDSM, why do you need the ASR? Seems kinda redundant.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Neil Greenfield
1
1
0
Actually, the only benefit I see to it is when/if a service member goes to another US military service. When wearing your ribbons, it shows that you served in the Army.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Cavalry Officer
1
1
0
I would have to disagree with getting rid of the ribbon. Soldiers earned it and it is a mark of distinction between having taken an oath and becoming a soldier and no longer being a civilian. I realize the uniform does the same thing, but like Napoleon said, “it is amazing ehat a man will do for a piece of useless ribbon.” Let the guys have their ribbons.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Eric Knutson
1
1
0
I never liked it when I was in myself, felt like a participation trophy as is was / is issued. now if they would put some device on it for multiple MOS Qual (school or OJT rated) THEN I would endorse keeping it. I say that knowing there were and are many like myself who have "earned" it more than once and it would serve to show others that you are more than a one trick pony.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Brian Lorkowski
1
1
0
If you fit the criteria then it has a purpose.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Mohor
1
1
0
If we take it away then the NCO Proffessional Development, Overseas Service Ribbon and a number of the other 80s ribbons medals could be put aside as well. I like the fact it's a form of continuing the old army traditions back to WWI. Notice it's rainbow coloration, it's just like the WWI Victory and WWII Victory Medals. I say keep it!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Cj Grisham
1
1
0
Most useless ribbon ever. It's basically a participation ribbon for soldiers.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PV2 Miles Hicks
1
1
0
Honestly, we were in formation before being dismissed to go to our next duty station/leave/fort home, the platoon sergeants just handed them to us and said "here". I didn't even know what it was for untiI looked it up. When we graduated basic we never received our NDSMs. We bought them later. Someone must have forgot:/
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close