Posted on Dec 1, 2014
Army Times
70K
152
109
17
17
0
635524319142490009 original
From: Army Times

The futuristic exosuits being tested by Army researchers won't help soldiers outrun locomotives, and it'll still take more than a single bound to clear a tall building.

But a final prototype of the device, which could cut a wearer's exertion level by 25 percent when carrying a 100-pound load and might let an unburdened soldier run a four-minute mile, could be tested in a realistic setting in less than two years, according to Maj. Christopher Orlowski, who runs the program under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's banner.

DARPA's Warrior Web initiative spans the entire military, but much of the testing for the four prototypes in the program's second phase, and the nine prototypes that made up Phase I, has been hosted by the Soldier Performance and Equipment Advanced Research facility — SPEAR, for short — at Maryland's Aberdeen Proving Ground.

"I'm exposed to a lot of really cool technology that not everyone gets to see," said Mike LaFiandra, chief of the Dismounted Warrior Branch at the Army Research Laboratory. "Big-picture, we're really at an exciting time. The technological advancements that are happening ... I can see 10 years or 15 years from now, this not only being a soldier device, but helping soldiers who are injured, once they get back."

Three years after Warrior Web's inception, soldier-testers are taking the prototypes out of the lab and onto a cross-country course, walking through the woods with an 80-pound pack. While researchers tag along, testers report any perceived benefits from the suit, as well as any problems with comfort or ease of wear — chafing, for example.

Feedback from testers has been positive, DARPA and Army officials said, especially after the soldiers have time to get used to wearing the devices. But comfort isn't the only issue under review, and the data analysis required to gauge the performance of such suits may be a heavier lift than the packs being lugged around the Aberdeen woods.

Rules for what the prototypes must look like are flexible to allow for innovation, but the final version likely will resemble a wet suit, only with a system attached designed to deliver the right force to the right muscle or joint at the right time to ease a soldier's workload.

The Soft Exosuit prototype, designed by a team from the Wyss Institute for
Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard, uses a series of pulleys to simulate leg movement. It focuses on supporting the hip and ankle joints; "if you look at the biomechanics of walking," program leader Conor Walsh said, "you see that those two joints are doing most of the work."

Because of the weight and wattage limitations put on the system by DARPA, researchers must find ways to benefit the wearer without excess power.

"We're trying to understand what are the most efficient times in the walking cycle to add energy," Walsh said. "Do we really understand those moments?"

The prototype underwent testing in Aberdeen in early October. The last of the prototypes scheduled for this round of testing, an Arizona State product known as Air Legs that'll visit the lab in either December or January, uses air pressure instead of pulleys.

Makers of Air Legs told CBS News in a Nov. 11 report they had been able to reduce exertion, or "metabolic load," by 10 percent so far, and that reaching the 25 percent threshold would mean a soldier wearing the device could run a mile in four minutes.

Track times aren't part of the DARPA metrics. Walsh said the Harvard group's prototype has "seen muscle activity being reduced in the key areas, and we've seen positive effect in the metabolic areas," but couldn't put a number to the findings.

The difficulty in finding those metabolic-load data points is part of the reason soldiers shouldn't expect a rapid roll-out of these suits, according to the experts.

"The way everyone walks is slightly different," LaFiandra said. "Maybe a previous injury, maybe the amount of experience you have walking with a load. ... There's a tremendous amount of individual variability. Merely putting this device on one or two people, with or without a load, and comparing those numbers, is insufficient."

DARPA's stated goal is to build a device that can be worn under the uniform by 90 percent of the Army, so getting the variations right is critical. And even if the device can adapt to its user, researchers must determine the proper training protocol so the user can adapt to the device.

It's the kind of research that can't be done entirely in university labs.

"Standard college students aren't experienced in carrying 100 pounds in a backpack," LaFiandra said.

Improving performance is only one of five focus areas for the program, according to a 2013 DARPA announcement. The others:

-Advanced controls: Suits that can "function without intervention by the wearer" and correct for when the wearer's stride changes — walking to running or kneeling to crawling, for instance.
-Wearability: Suits that remain lightweight, cool and comfortable despite performance-enhancing add-ons, and can sense and process biometrics without external computer power.
-Safety: Suits that lend stability to joints and help muscles with a soldier's typical burdens, both of which could limit chronic injuries.
-Grab bag: Suits with what DARPA calls "additional assistive wearable technologies," which could be used to aid wearers undergoing rehabilitation or physical therapy, for example, or even help the elderly remain mobile.

All prototypes must tackle at least three focus areas, according to the statement, with "full-suit" entries needing to address all but the final, miscellaneous category. And the competition's end is in sight.

"DARPA plans to test the final prototype in appropriate mission profiles under realistic loads to evaluate performance," Orlowski, the program manager, said in an emailed response to questions. "These tests are currently planned for late 2016."

Once the technology is in place, which soldiers receive the exosuits and how they use them becomes the Army's problem — Orlowski said DARPA will "leave it up to the services to determine specific operational uses." Suits that pass the types of tests done in Aberdeen and meet the program's requirements would benefit most any soldier carrying any gear in any operational environment.

"Twenty or 30 years ago, it may have seemed far-fetched," LaFiandra said. "When I look at the Warrior Web prototypes, I don't think it's far-fetched. I think it's a matter of time."

http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/tech/2014/11/30/exosuit-super-soldier-darpa-aberdeen-army-harvard/19487395/
Posted in these groups: United states army logo ArmyTechnology Technology
Avatar feed
Responses: 45
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
SPC David Hannaman
1
1
0
John Steakley's "Armor" is awesome in theory (and a book I highly recommend) but I think we're a long way from there. It's not a new concept either, Marvel Comic's "Iron Man" came out in 1963.

Here's the problem...

Anything that doesn't react as quickly, move as fast, and fit through small spaces as well as the human body is a detriment... it's going to get caught on stuff, or trap you in a place where the bad guys will have the advantage.

Then there's the issue of powering it... Even the comic books recognize this, and we just don't have Arc-reactors and cold fusion. If we did we probably wouldn't *care* what happened in the middle east.

At the end of the day, when you have "boots on the ground" you want to train the brain of the guy in the field. If you do that effectively the possibilities are limitless, forage for food and water, take out battalions with wine bottles and gasoline...

I love technology, I have a laser dot scope on my AR-15... but at the end of the day I'd better know how to use the Iron sights when the batteries go dead. I have a GPS on my phone... I still need to be able to read a map.

Invest in the person, and then pay them enough to retain them. Keep politics out of war... politicians should have an "On" and "Off" button for a military action... ROE should be set by the commanders in the field.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Jeffrey Turville
1
1
0
I did a research project in college on this suit they are awesome it could wipe away more back issued for our veterans when they leave the service I wish I had it when I had to march 25 miles as a 88M no less not even infantry the funny part was I beat the scouts and infantry back what can I say not bad for a truck driver
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Senior Paralegal Nco
1
1
0
It will be interesting to watch the development of this and other assistive technologies. They'll be a force multiplier, but I hope that training and doctrine command don't dismiss tried and true training in lieu of these newer (and easier) fighting aids.

New Soldiers still need to develop the foundation of strength, endurance, agility, stamina, power, and balance to carry a heavy load over uneven terrain while under stress. We need to continue to develop strong, well conditioned Soldiers then enhance their fighting abilities with these new technologies.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC John Decker
1
1
0
I would have worn it when I was in. The idea of a medic being able to reach a wounded soldier quicker and with less expended energy should appeal to every person in uniform.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Zachary Brooks
1
1
0
Dxcover
Will this let me jump twenty feet in the air and kick through concrete walls?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
11 y
CPT Zachary Brooks We were just talking about that game!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Gordon Hill
1
1
0
How about we spend the tax payers money on caring for our wounded veterans in VA system and outside the system. Why spend money on war that may never happen and war does not lead to peace just more violence and damaged people.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
11 y
SSG Gordon Hill

While I do not disagree on spending money taking care of our current troops and veterans, we cannot do it on the backs of our future soldiers. I pray we can create a force that does actually make it possible for war to never happen again.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Quality Control Technical Inspector
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
I agree with putting the money on the Soldier: past; present and future, whatever the needs are for those individuals, especialy those that have already fulfilled their promise to serve with honor. I do not agree with cutting from the future Soldiers when there is a huge sum of money being given away in the welfare programs and in forign aid.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gordon Hill
SSG Gordon Hill
11 y
Thank you SSG
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Senior Paralegal Nco
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" ~ George Santayana

(Editorial Note: the quote has been wrongfully attributed, with no citation, to Plato since MacArthur's address to West Point and Ridley Scott opened Black Hawk Down with it. George Santayana used the phrase in "Soliloquies in England" (Scribners, 1924, p. 102) which reads, "Yet the poor fellows think they are safe! They think that the war is over! Only the dead have seen the end of war.")
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Forscom Strategy Team
1
1
0
It's great, until the batteries die...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Tim Everett
1
1
0
Suddenly wearing power armour is attainable...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Kristin Parsons
1
1
0
This looks like something from Robocop but if it lightens the heavy load that our troops have to carry then I'm all for it!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Ernest Edge
0
0
0
Absolutely amazing how advances in technology has changed warfare over history. Just yesterday I read an article about the killing of an ISIS-K planner. We hit his moving car at midnight using a drone.
Advances are not limited to just munitions. This exosuit seems almost sci-go, but it’s sure to be standard issue within the next 20 years. I retired almost 11 years ago. The advances I witnessed in my 22 year career were incredible. The advances since retirement continue to impress and amaze.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT Isr Program Manager
0
0
0
This would be beneficial to the Light Infantry guys to reduce long term injuries.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Elphick
0
0
0
I see many people worried about batteries going out but that can be fixed with a new battery (it may take awhile but at least you can get moving again at some point) but my concern is what happens when a bullet or shrapnel takes out a key component (hydraulics, electronics, etc.) and the whole thing becomes unservicable in the field? Like a said a battery can be replaced but I have a feeling if that thing gets damaged it's done for and then you have a soldier with no exoskeleton and no gear because it's too heavy to carry without it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Jed Fisher
0
0
0
How noisy is it? If it's noisy, might as well be on a dirt bike. Or a horse...
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David S.
0
0
0
Just think pretty soon you'll be able to carry a HUMVEE.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Edward Valiket
SGT Edward Valiket
11 y
I am not so sure I am in favor of this exosuit stuff, I can see a down side to it also
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPL Robert Washington
CPL Robert Washington
11 y
That looks so dangerous. I can't help but think about one those lines being cut and oil/air spraying everywhere. Now, that load is coming down hard.
<----Just Do PT... #Squats
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Shop Supervisor
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
I could go for one right now!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
So like the Flintstones...
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC John Lindahl
0
0
0
an intriguing evolution to the power-suits in development for carrying and offloading heavy loads. The cynical side of me says this new version wouldn't be used to combat fatigue. The real world deployment would be dump more gear and ammo on the soldiers for the same fatigue levels of today's loads. Garry Owen
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Jason Jarstfer
SSG Jason Jarstfer
11 y
That is cool
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Flight Nurse
0
0
0
The idea is awesome! One of the benefits would obviously be saving joints and reducing the bearing that a body takes, especially over a 20 year career.
The biggest drawback I see, looking at the design and the possible variances, is how to protect our injured personnel while in the suit. A dismounted IED blast is still a very real threat... The use of combat tourniquets has reduced battlefield deaths exponentially. The design of this system will either need to somehow incorporate built in application points for those tourniquets or they will become useless on the lower extremities. There is no way to quickly apply and appropriately tighten one on the design shown or described. Keep in mind that these systems have he potential of creating more shrapnel and secondary injury as well.
Use guidelines will also have to incorporate strict periods of non-use to avoid muscle wasting or reduction in natural strength secondary to decreased load bearing by the musculoskeletal system of the user.
(0)
Comment
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
11 y
Capt (Join to see) - Another aspect I see is load alignment. For example, how does one wear his/her sidearm with a suit such as this? To what extent does this suit increase operating temperatures? Will it operate as advertised in the cold? While the idea is an exciting advance, I think there are a lot of questions that need answers before fielding.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Horizontal Construction Engineer
0
0
0
The two main issues I see with this are 1) expense. It always seems the best/most fun toys never get sent to regular units, usually because they come with a rather high price tag. And 2) power. I have a feeling these suits would need a lot of juice, which means a big battery. Even taking into account the suit would negate the added weight of carrying its own extra batteries, that takes up space I would rather fill with other necessities like food, water, or ammo.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Dj Wight
SSG Dj Wight
11 y
could have used that about day 24 of ranger school
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Horizontal Construction Engineer
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
SSG Dj Wight The food or the suit? lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Patrick McCullough
SGT Patrick McCullough
11 y
They can work, but I don't think we're their yet. Also, I don't believe joe will take care of this gear. Once they can be trusted with personal hygiene they they can be trusted with tens of thousands of dollars worth of equipment. Until then, keep it on the tier 1 and test phases.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Student
LTC (Join to see)
11 y
The battery life may mitagated in coming years by spray on solor technology. So you may have room for all of the actual essentials.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Sam R. Baker
0
0
0
Maybe this means my body can go an extra 10-15 years then! Nice exoskeleton road march!
(0)
Comment
(0)
CSM Michael Lynch
CSM Michael Lynch
11 y
I agree and goes with the question of if recalled from retirement would you serve again, with this equipment I could be 30 again and do it another 30 years.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
WO1 Information Technology Specialist
0
0
0
Today its exosuits tomorrow its Terminator! This is amazing though its crazy how fast technology is accelerating.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT James Hastings
SGT James Hastings
11 y
Wow, science keeps on moving.  Hope they don't freeze up at low temps.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG John Taylor
0
0
0
Hooah!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.