Posted on Jan 16, 2021
SSG Motor Transport Operator
35.4K
1.71K
916
86
86
0
Is there a moment where the US armed forces not partake in decisions made by congress when things get to political? What if they are wanting actions to occur by our military when they go against the people and the constitution? Is it even the us military anymore at that point? Question stems from an uncertain near future with the new “leadership” that we now have. Just asking out of curiosity
Posted in these groups: Imgres ConstitutionUcmj UCMJ
Avatar feed
Responses: 127
CPT Michael Theimer
3
3
0
As long as orders are legal. Your oath is to defend the Constitution of the United States. You should NOT obey illegal orders.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Kenneth Heath
3
3
0
We swore to uphold the Constitution and obey LAWFUL orders of superiors. We must uphold the Constitution FIRST, and then process orders as lawfully applicable.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Gregory Balint
5
3
2
We as service members swear an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Can not and do support former president trump with his rally call to storm and take the capital building. At that point in his presidency he became an enemy of the Republic.

Gregory Balint
USAF (Ret. ) E-7.
(5)
Comment
(2)
SFC Domingo M.
SFC Domingo M.
3 y
PFC Kimberly Staiti - They weren't lies and history will bear that out. It has this nasty habit of correcting itself over time. Name one of many accusations the left has made against President Trump that has stuck. All those accusations over a four-year period were based on lies and hearsay. When it comes to where the rubber meets the road, the Left had to back off. If we, as conservatives, stand idly by and let the Democrats get away with their lies and innuendo, then we would all hang by tomorrow noon. If you missed the testimony and questioning in the 2nd attempt to impeach the President, you should dig it up and listen to it. Pelosi's side was made to look like fools by the Trump defense legal team. The reason for that is they had no proof to back up the one charge they rushed to impeachment with. We even have backstabbers like Mitch McConnell, Collins, Murkowski, and Romney... who voted with the Democrats, and even then, they lost. The people you're defending were wrong, and they did cheat to win this election. Unfortunately, as I said, we'll have to wait on history to correct that injustice.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Kimberly Staiti
PFC Kimberly Staiti
3 y
SFC Domingo M. Respectfully, the Republicans have had to admit there was no vote tampering. No matter how it's done, there's zero evidence for it. Nobody ran out to vote for Biden. There were more votes cast by mail (to make sure those votes were counted and not dumped bc of hanging chads or machines being manipulated) than were cast in the ~entire~ election of DJT v HRC. My whole family voted by mail. We had a lot of our own votes count against others since there's plenty of healthy political disagreement, but all of us wanted our votes to be hand counted.

Now, here is where I'm going to tiptoe: DJT was inaugurated illegally. I have no idea why he was allowed to take office without complying with the Emoluments Clause, but he was. Additionally, many of his supporters believe he was a servant like JFK who didn't need a salary and didn't take one. That's a huge lie. He gave $100k to 2 different charities. That was it. Being POTUS made him a Billion because of all the Secret Service agents being charged to stay at Trump-owned properties. His kids and their families stayed at Trump owned places all over the globe, usually doing so separately; or Jared in the Middle East, Ivanka at a Women's Work initiative in CONUS or often Europe. Multiply that by all his kids and the Secret Service budget was in the red in DJT's ~first~ year in office.

And we really can't measure the damage done to the office and the public's trust in the law or Constitution when he enticed, encouraged, and convinced his supporters to execute a premeditated, unlawful, lethal, attempted (but failed) coup when blood was spilled in our Capitol Building by people who were attempting to find lawmakers they were trying to assassinate. As CIC, POTUS had the power to activate those troops who had been deployed to DC in case of a scenario just like what happened. The commanders even called to affirm their readiness and we're told they weren't needed. There are at least 6 different LEA's with jurisdiction in DC and because their "governor" is POTUS, they all stood down while people died. On US soil. Inside the sacred halls of our Capitol Building, the ground zero of democracy in our Republic. Cmdrs of the DC police,Capitol police, FBI, yada yada got blamed, but it was on the US president to keep order. He watched it on TV, excited that it began and disappointed there wasn't a bigger crowd. That comes from people who were there. On scene with POTUS,some urging him to put it to a stop.

How long did it go on before he told them he loved them, but it was time to stop? He didn't command them to stand down immediately and turn themselves in. He gave some tepid words, dragged out of him by his LAWYERS ~after~ multiple assaults and deaths had occurred.

I agree with you 100%: History will bear it out.

Even though Trump appointed 2/3rds of the Federal Circuit judges, none of them are allowing him to counter or drop the dozens of suits involved.

I'm not a Democrat. I don't fit anywhere in the political spectrum. I'm too conservative for liberals and too liberal for conservatives.
I don't expect anyone to support all my views.

But no one can say Trump fulfilled the requirements of the office because he never did attempt to comply with the Constitution and blindly give up his business interests. The first president in history to be non-compliant with the Emoluments Clause.

That is what is called "leverage." Anything that can be used against you is cause for a clearance to be revoked. Yet he made over a B, Bravo, ~Billion~ by having ~unofficial~ meetings with high level foreign business people and folks in politics/government officials who stayed at the "Post Office" or Mar-a-Lago. Those are only the ones we know of. How in the name of national security did Jared Kushner get access to the highest of the high level intel? He *repeatedly* had to correct his list of foreign contacts, businesses, and foreign trips. Had he been in the Army, he could have gotten away with a single, tiny revision. Anymore and he would be facing charges of lying on an official govt document. I've seen soldiers go to Leavenworth bc they called the CQ to extend their leave and the CQ failed to document the call. Even after the CQ admitted his failure, the troop went to prison.

I'm sorry, but everything does rise or fall on leadership and the US is on her knees after the Trump administration

I don't recall
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Howard Holmes
SFC Howard Holmes
3 y
Wow Master Sgt., you really should balance out the media from which you obtain your news until you find out the truth of what really happened. There were some people I know who's adult children happened to be in D.C. the day of the attack. They had passes to tour the Capital. They had their reservations, passes etc., months before there was even a rally scheduled. They were in the Capital touring it when things started kicking off. They had video of three busses that were NOT part of the Trump rally pulling in front of the Capitol. They had video of the as the people off-loaded and stormed the Capitol, and that was the beginning of the event. This couple had the FBI come after them at their home, they lost their jobs and were arrested. Their computers were confiscated, whatever the video was on (Zip drive, or SIM card) was taken. The parents have not heard from them and have no idea where they are. There were and are still a lot of phony stories, like it was an "armed takeover." The only shots fired were the ones that took the AF (vets) female's life by a Capitol Police Officer. There were not guns or expelled shells confiscated or found. It was also falsely reported that the Capitol Police Officer was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher, Not True. So, No, President Trump did NOT tell anybody to storm the Capitol. Please expand your mind and really research things that can be detrimental to your beliefs and can cause you to condemn or damn somebody without having all of the facts. Thank you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SP5 Larry (Lawrence) Pitman
SP5 Larry (Lawrence) Pitman
10 mo
SFC Domingo M. - I clicked on the link taking me to Trump's Jan 6 rally speech and SFC Holmes chose to quote a short section at the beginning of the lengthy speech while ignoring the critical final minute of the speech. "“Something’s wrong here. Something’s really wrong. Can’t have happened.” And we fight. We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." While we can play word games all day long with his "fight like hell" statement, those words ignited a fuse in many people who decided to take that fight to our capitol building. Words matter.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CWO3 Us Marine
3
3
0
If you mean "separate" as no longer obeying lawful orders from duly appointed civilian authority, that would be known as a military coup. It's in the Oath you took. Not fake news, deep state, QANON, but lawful under Constitution, and enforceable under UCMJ.

The Oath of Enlistment (for enlisted): "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

The Oath of Office (for officers): "I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the _____ (Military Branch) of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."
(3)
Comment
(0)
CWO3 Us Marine
CWO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
"Lawful" was the operative word here. Civilians have no authority other than the Constitutional duty of a loyal citizen. No Chain of Command. No Commander. That is, unless they join a militia group, which are not recognized as legal authority. Folks on active duty fall under the UCMJ. They can refuse to obey what they believe to be an unlawful order, and pay the price if they are wrong. Attacking the Capitol because Captain Q told you to will not fly in court. Neither will the personal beliefs that cause you to act without any orders. Our laws have to meet a Constitutionality test or they are stricken. Courts make that call. Not militia or individuals acting on their own behalf. That's the way it is.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Curtis Underwood
SPC Curtis Underwood
3 y
CWO3 (Join to see) - That is the problem Civilians have no authority other than the Constitutional duty of a loyal citizen. The civilian power of the vote has been questioned so it has caused a larger division between the people and great unrest.
The courts of the land are no longer trusted by either side and it is getting worse. The congress, senate and president is losing trust of their supporters daily.
The only trust any of the people have now is in the constitution and that it was written for the people. So what would you expect of people that have no faith in the system.
The military if they decide to follow illegal orders that actually goes against the constitution will have failed in its basic reason for existing and that is to protect the constitution and the people.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CWO3 Us Marine
CWO3 (Join to see)
3 y
SPC Curtis Underwood - Citizens are the most powerful element in a "United" States of America, IF they are in large numbers and truly united. A large gathering can bankrupt a corporation through boycott, remove politicians through their collective votes, and protest to right obvious wrongs in Government. It takes unity though, and is why we are intentionally divided and pitted against each other. Easier to manage warring factions than a united front.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Curtis Underwood
SPC Curtis Underwood
3 y
CWO3 (Join to see) - That is very true. I also understand your position.
I am a Veteran and what I am seeing is not good at all. The future of the USA is very bleak.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Michael Bowen
2
2
0
Maj Ken L made a gutless move posted a comment to me that won't allow a reply but here is is anyways MAJ Ken Landgren - Keep up your delusion Maj . and continue the lie . You know as well as i do the rulings were made with out allowing the evidence to be presented . They ruled on the validity of the evidence with out ever having seen it or allowing it to be presented . The Infinite lie is believing Biden with an all but non existent campaign that few people ever even showed up to won by over 10,000,000 more votes then Obama and any other president in history . They even went so far as to hold a fake side show hearing to give the pretense of "reviewing" the evidence to determine whether or not it would even be allowed in court. When they new all they were going to do is summarily dismiss every witness , affidavit , and video presented and not allow it to be heard in court . BTW as a matter of law you do a full investigation to determine the validity of an accusation and there was more then enough evidence to warrant an investigation with all the witnesses ,affidavits and videos . And it was wide spread . And Biden didn't win , Not legally . But keep repeating the lies soon they will become your truth . Or they already have . Clearly your ideology is not served by reality .
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
3 y
Wow fact checking is wrong. U never did tell me if Trump did a good job with the pandemic. 60 some federal fraud cases lost and u claim they were never heard. That is extraordinary. So u believe in a pathological liar. SSgt Michael Bowen
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Michael Bowen
SSgt Michael Bowen
3 y
MAJ Ken Landgren - Nice try at the spin and misleading reply . I never said fact checking was wrong And every one hear can see that . You asked if i used fact check an on line service that has been wrong many times and makes it a third party Hearsay which means you are just regurgitating what some one else is saying , I said i do my own fact checking from the sources themselves . And yes Trump did do a good job as much as he could do with the never ending hindrance and interfering he got from democrats . They made it clear they would do anything they could by any means to undermine his administration . And that's not speculation they said as much and on video . And they did just that. And the only one that believes in a true pathological liar is you . Biden has lied for over 47 years non stop . Even to the point he had to pull out of a presidential run in 1988 for that very reason . But back then the Media was not so accommodating so he didn't get away with it unlike today where they cover it up . Kind of like what you're trying to do . Look I get it you have TDS And nothing can change that . And because it's a political ideological disorder there is no cure . We get that too .
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
3 y
Some more drivel I refuse to read. SSgt Michael Bowen
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Michael Bowen
SSgt Michael Bowen
3 y
If you don't read it Then how do you know it's drivel ? or is that just your assumption and opinion based on your hurt feelings again ? I would expect better from a Maj then cheap empty dismissive nonsense . But i guess your ego is getting in the way . News flash you being or having been a Maj and me having been a SSGT does not in any way make you a superior person to any one , get over yourself . Fact : your opinions and beliefs are no more or less valid then my own . To each his own deal with it .
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 John Burleson
2
2
0
Somewhere, probably on a bathroom stall wall, we're told we don't have to follow an "illegal" order. If I could just find that part of the UCMJ I'd yell it from the flagpole in front of the Pentagon. I know Ive read the section but I don't remember what the UCMJ thpught was an illegal order. So we get to make our own tiny little minds up. My tiny little mind has decided that if I can't find the Constitutional prerequisite for the order, it's illegal and somebody is about to get whacked with a dead fish. So soldiers get to make up their own minds on this point> Another problem. Get ten Marines together and you get ten opinions. What a conundrum!! My personal idea of an illegal order is when Hide-in-A- Hole Joe orders his militry to clear Congress because he wants to be Premier of the Peoplz Democratic Republic of Amerika. Which is where his puppet master, Kamalean, is headed.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Bde Ew Tech
2
2
0
There's 2 documents that lay it out: we're sworn to the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence backs it up with what we won't stand for. Give them both a good read.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Lars Eilenfeld
2
2
0
Under the UCMJ it is the right and duty to disobey a unlawful or immoral order. That being said you better have your ducks in a row if your going to do that and hopefully your Commander and Joint Chiefs have a spine to not allow you to be put in that situation but I wouldn't hold my breath on that one you may pop a blood vessel.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
2
2
0
I was asking that years ago. There was a point at which Soldiers, Police, and Managers would have to take a stand. With the Government or the Terrorists. You couldn’t be a soldier or Policeman and an Oathkeeper at he same time.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Harris
2
2
0
Doesn't mean I have to like him. He is the Commander-in-Chief.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC Curtis Underwood
SPC Curtis Underwood
3 y
No but when he commands you to go against the constitution it is your duty to disobey him and bring charges against him. That is your oath.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis
Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis
3 y
I think there might be an elephant in the room. I will attempt to identify it:
One - The SECDEF has recently releases a memo to the field about extremism. I think I get the point, but at what point does something become labeled "extremism"? It seems to be defined a bit softly, if at all.
Two - The current Administration has rescinded the Previous Administration's EO's regarding the "1619 Project" and "Critical Race Theory" both of which seem to me to be ... ahem ... sketchy, to say the least.
Three - The almost incessant cry of "racism" along with finger-pointing. It almost sounds like the "reign of terror" in late eighteenth century France.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close