Posted on Feb 9, 2015
Can the POTUS be charged with Dereliction of Duty as CinC? What would constitute this and what might the ramifications be?
10.7K
10
14
1
1
0
I am not looking to hang any one out to dry on this, but I know the rank and file have been charged in the past and was wondering if this goes straight to the top or not. Every one has an opinion if they see wrong doing, esp if lives are in the balance as a result of action/inaction taken by those in charge.
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 6
No, He cannot be so charged.
At no time will he be subject to the UCMJ, not being a member of the Armed Services. The POTUS is not AT the top of the military chain of command. He is ABOVE the top of the military chain of command. While he can command the military (CinC), he is NOT part of it.
While a sitting President, he can be impeached and convicted (two separate things, from two different houses of congress) of high crimes and misdemeanors. He can also be sued as an individual. It MIGHT be possible to bring criminal charges against him while sitting, though I believe any action on them would be deferred until his term(s) was complete.
At no time will he be subject to the UCMJ, not being a member of the Armed Services. The POTUS is not AT the top of the military chain of command. He is ABOVE the top of the military chain of command. While he can command the military (CinC), he is NOT part of it.
While a sitting President, he can be impeached and convicted (two separate things, from two different houses of congress) of high crimes and misdemeanors. He can also be sued as an individual. It MIGHT be possible to bring criminal charges against him while sitting, though I believe any action on them would be deferred until his term(s) was complete.
(2)
(0)
Pvt Richard Hy
Thank you LTC(verify), that makes sense and clarifies the chain of command. This is why you make the big bucks!
(0)
(0)
Congress can "sue" him to do specific things, however he does have what is referred to as "Enforcement Discretion" & "Prosecution Discretion" as head of the Executive Branch.
In other words, he doesn't have to do "everything" exactly as written. He has the ability to "interpret" laws, and dedicate resources in the best ways.
For example, Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act
He is currently not enforcing parts of it (Recreational Marijuana in CO & WA). Enforcement Discretion.
We have also seen "Prosecution Discretion" which is something as simple as letting someone off with a verbal warning rather than a speeding ticket. Sometimes it costs more to conduct a trial than the crime is worth.
So that said, the President can argue that he is well within his powers NOT TO DO SOMETHING. That it actually makes sense to ignore a specific duty for the "greater good" because he is focusing resources to something more important.
In other words, he doesn't have to do "everything" exactly as written. He has the ability to "interpret" laws, and dedicate resources in the best ways.
For example, Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act
He is currently not enforcing parts of it (Recreational Marijuana in CO & WA). Enforcement Discretion.
We have also seen "Prosecution Discretion" which is something as simple as letting someone off with a verbal warning rather than a speeding ticket. Sometimes it costs more to conduct a trial than the crime is worth.
So that said, the President can argue that he is well within his powers NOT TO DO SOMETHING. That it actually makes sense to ignore a specific duty for the "greater good" because he is focusing resources to something more important.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next