Considering that the USA economy is at almost full employment, is now a good time for the new Deploy or Discharge Policy?

MSG (Anonymous) - And your misinterpretation and willfully ignoring the correction doesn't strengthen your position. Nowhere did SFC Jason Boyd suggest that an injury makes for a welfare dependent. Somehow you confuse the few with the many. The point is if you can't deploy for an entire year and doubtful that you will become deployable it's time for you to medically retire or just depart from service. The appropriations for national defense are not to be used to keep individuals off the welfare roles they are to pay Soldiers to fight and win America's wars. That is the point.

MSG (Anonymous) - Causality violation there, you can't use something a Soldier said after you made your argument as a rational why you made the argument in the first place. There is no reason why a Soldier should be non-deployable for a year without a MEB unless they have one of the exemptions listed. SFC (Join to see) did nothing of the sort you accuse him to do only your twisted interpretation in order to justify your delusional viewpoints.

When I was in I was sick and tired of seeing NCOs and MAJs and above with no deployments. I also don't think people with legitimate injuries will be swept up in this change, but we've all seen people in uniform who shouldn't be.

He supported his point repeatedly and you simply kept reasserting yours.
The original question asks about the job market, separating SMs and the responsibility of the military in releasing these SMs onto the job market. In fact, the question was never about who separates or why.