Posted on Sep 8, 2015
Did you know about Lies They Tell Transitioning Veterans, Part 1: Your MOS is Your Destiny?
30.6K
74
47
17
17
0
RP Members this is just one author's opinion - what feedback to you have with regard to Transition Programs in your various branches? (See Complete article below)
Did you know about Lies They Tell Transitioning Veterans, Part 1: Your MOS is Your Destiny?
By Peter Gudmundsson
CEO & President at RecruitMilitary
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lies-tell-transitioning-veterans-part-1-your-mos-peter-gudmundsson?trk=pulse-det-nav_art
For some years, all transitioning military personnel have been required to complete career planning classes before they leave active service. Known by acronyms like TAPS, ACAPS or GPS, these courses aim to confer to the soon-to-be veteran the skills, attitude and contacts he or she will need to conduct an effective job search. During those precious hours, well intentioned contract instructors labor to convey the best-practices experiences of the thousands of personnel who have transitioned before. Much of the content is good, like how to write a resume, but many of the learning points are unhelpful at best and damaging at worst. While teachers struggle to hold the attention of daydreaming of home men and women of all ranks, the service members learn lessons that will be damaging to their transitions. Veteran job seekers who are ambitious and driven will do well to beware of these counterproductive messages and in many cases do the opposite of what is taught.
This is the first in a series entitled “Lies They Tell Transitioning Veterans.” The title is not intended to be incendiary but it should grab the attention of the veteran reader. The cumulative effect of these transition class errors is to derail the job search of many and to diminish the effectiveness of the others.
First, we look at the pernicious message that one’s assigned Military Occupational Specialty (“MOS”) will dictate one’s civilian career options. In subsequent installments we will review other assumptions and errors.
In the past few years, “experts” have explained partially the apparent disconnect between the demand for effective workers and the supply of high quality veteran talent as a matter of the former simply not understanding the latter. In this view, if the hiring company or the job candidate veteran were to simply insert her Military Occupational Specialty code into a software box, an algorithm could “translate” the job experience into a civilian job title that would make sense. Most MOS translation software is either humorously obvious (e.g. an Army truck driver can drive civilian trucks) or discouragingly limited (an infantry sergeant should be a security guard). For most veterans these software programs are an exercise in limiting their options rather than expanding them.
Veterans spend an inordinate amount of time focused on the superficial terminology of their resumes and become restricted in what they think they are qualified to do. Instead, job seekers should think of their MOS like a college major. If an MOS is directly applicable to a civilian job that the veteran wants to continue (e.g. medical technician, pilot or electrician), he should use it to demonstrate his fit and qualification. If not, as with those who served in the combat arms, it should be seen as an opportunity to demonstrate intangible characteristics rather than specific job skills. For example, a former Army Ranger should have no trouble communicating that he is tough, team oriented and doggedly determined to accomplish his quota in a sales job. This is much like the fact that no one who understands the value of a quality liberal arts education should ever suggest that a History or English major is good for nothing but teaching.
Who you are is much more important that what you were classified to do in the military. Know how your military experience might be valuable in the civilian market on a conceptual level if the literal aspects are not compelling. For example, there is little demand for computing artillery firing data in the civilian world but there is tremendous need for people who can work with numbers on team with very tight deadlines and lots of pressure. Concentrate on communicating those benefits rather than apologizing that you don’t fit exactly the enumerated job skills of the civilian position.
Your military experience is in high demand in the civilian world. It is the reason why veteran unemployment is lower than civilian employment. Veterans make great employees. Have confidence in who you are and what you are capable of accomplishing. Tell your story and don’t let any piece of software or a misguided classification of your experience hold you back.
Peter A. Gudmundsson is a former US Marine artillery officer and is the CEO of RecruitMilitary, the nation’s leading provider of veteran hiring solutions. He may be reached at @PAGudmundsson or on Linkedin.
Did you know about Lies They Tell Transitioning Veterans, Part 1: Your MOS is Your Destiny?
By Peter Gudmundsson
CEO & President at RecruitMilitary
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lies-tell-transitioning-veterans-part-1-your-mos-peter-gudmundsson?trk=pulse-det-nav_art
For some years, all transitioning military personnel have been required to complete career planning classes before they leave active service. Known by acronyms like TAPS, ACAPS or GPS, these courses aim to confer to the soon-to-be veteran the skills, attitude and contacts he or she will need to conduct an effective job search. During those precious hours, well intentioned contract instructors labor to convey the best-practices experiences of the thousands of personnel who have transitioned before. Much of the content is good, like how to write a resume, but many of the learning points are unhelpful at best and damaging at worst. While teachers struggle to hold the attention of daydreaming of home men and women of all ranks, the service members learn lessons that will be damaging to their transitions. Veteran job seekers who are ambitious and driven will do well to beware of these counterproductive messages and in many cases do the opposite of what is taught.
This is the first in a series entitled “Lies They Tell Transitioning Veterans.” The title is not intended to be incendiary but it should grab the attention of the veteran reader. The cumulative effect of these transition class errors is to derail the job search of many and to diminish the effectiveness of the others.
First, we look at the pernicious message that one’s assigned Military Occupational Specialty (“MOS”) will dictate one’s civilian career options. In subsequent installments we will review other assumptions and errors.
In the past few years, “experts” have explained partially the apparent disconnect between the demand for effective workers and the supply of high quality veteran talent as a matter of the former simply not understanding the latter. In this view, if the hiring company or the job candidate veteran were to simply insert her Military Occupational Specialty code into a software box, an algorithm could “translate” the job experience into a civilian job title that would make sense. Most MOS translation software is either humorously obvious (e.g. an Army truck driver can drive civilian trucks) or discouragingly limited (an infantry sergeant should be a security guard). For most veterans these software programs are an exercise in limiting their options rather than expanding them.
Veterans spend an inordinate amount of time focused on the superficial terminology of their resumes and become restricted in what they think they are qualified to do. Instead, job seekers should think of their MOS like a college major. If an MOS is directly applicable to a civilian job that the veteran wants to continue (e.g. medical technician, pilot or electrician), he should use it to demonstrate his fit and qualification. If not, as with those who served in the combat arms, it should be seen as an opportunity to demonstrate intangible characteristics rather than specific job skills. For example, a former Army Ranger should have no trouble communicating that he is tough, team oriented and doggedly determined to accomplish his quota in a sales job. This is much like the fact that no one who understands the value of a quality liberal arts education should ever suggest that a History or English major is good for nothing but teaching.
Who you are is much more important that what you were classified to do in the military. Know how your military experience might be valuable in the civilian market on a conceptual level if the literal aspects are not compelling. For example, there is little demand for computing artillery firing data in the civilian world but there is tremendous need for people who can work with numbers on team with very tight deadlines and lots of pressure. Concentrate on communicating those benefits rather than apologizing that you don’t fit exactly the enumerated job skills of the civilian position.
Your military experience is in high demand in the civilian world. It is the reason why veteran unemployment is lower than civilian employment. Veterans make great employees. Have confidence in who you are and what you are capable of accomplishing. Tell your story and don’t let any piece of software or a misguided classification of your experience hold you back.
Peter A. Gudmundsson is a former US Marine artillery officer and is the CEO of RecruitMilitary, the nation’s leading provider of veteran hiring solutions. He may be reached at @PAGudmundsson or on Linkedin.
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 25
My civilian career has never had anything to do with my military AFSC. In fact, most of my military service was outside my AFSC, come to think of it.
OTOH, my military thinking and attitude has driven everything I did from separation to retirement.
OTOH, my military thinking and attitude has driven everything I did from separation to retirement.
(1)
(0)
I don't know what TAP program you folks are attending, but it is very different from the one I witness at MacDill AFB. First, I will agree that TAP is for the masses and offers very little in the way of individual attention. Could it be better, of course, but we have to work with what we have. Second, when we talk about Veterans you would swear they all rode the short yellow bus. I retired in 2008 and the TAP program today is 200% better than what I had. What TAP did not teach I researched and found the answers. I sought answers from everyone I knew and what they could not answer I asked Mr. Google because he knows everything. I didn't sit around and whine about things. I made things happen. Veterans are used to someone always doing something for them while they are in the military. Someone will fix my equipment, feed me, entertain me, advise me, and take care of my administrative issues. GUESS WHAT! YOU have now become all of those people. You have to take care of yourself. The Veterans I knew would overcome the obstacles in their way and find a way to make things work. They would not wait for someone to come and do things for you. I work with transitioning veterans and I guess I am the chosen one that has to tell them like it is. Believe me I don't sugar coat anything! Don't complain that TAP was a waste of time, you got out of it what you put into it. Stop checking your emails from work, stop answering calls from work, stop worrying about how your unit will operate without you. The TAP program has to do with YOUR transition and believe me if you dropped dead your unit would keep moving without you. I have never heard any the TAP instructors tell a transitioning service member their MOS was their destiny. The MOS Crosswalk is conducted based on information provided by the DOL and the Bureau of Labor Statistics because, let's face it, some Veterans do want to stay in their field. Those that do not are called Career Changers because they want to change careers. It doesn't take a genius to recognize that. I can tell some of you were the ones that complained about being in TAP and away from your unit for a whole week. REALLY? Veteran unemployment is under 5% and I believe the new and improved TAP has contributed significantly to this. I work on MacDill AFB for the local workforce board and a direct source of employment leads, recruiters, and hiring mangers in the Tampa Bay area. So I do know what I am talking about. Thank you for allowing me to add to this whine fest you all are having. All you need now is some cheese to go with it.
(1)
(0)
When leaving or retiring from the military all of the various classes from all services are only part of the opportunities afforded to service members. There is still some work the service member must do on their own. There are many tools, websites, and other resources that may be used to assist service members but may not be spoon fed to them. If a service member knows they are retiring or leaving military service soon it is imperative they begin looking into the various resources available to them earlier (at least 6-9 months out) than later. The market is wide open for military members whether retiring or ETSing but you have to be proactive.
(1)
(0)
I was/am direct and to the point, I say what I mean and mean what I say . I am harsh in my ways and dont like change that much, I find the max usage for what little I have and find it peaceful to be out in the woods away from large masses of people. I always look to the sky for my weather report and never worry about where my next meal is coming from or if Ill have to sleep with no shelter over my head.People...Im an 11B... A ground pounder, a Grunt... I did what I did because no one else in other Mos's wanted to do what I did.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


Jobs
Transition
Soldiers
Employment
