Posted on May 10, 2015
CW5 Roy Rucker Sr.
214K
1.12K
648
95
84
11
Edited 9 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 239
PO3 Brad Phlipot
0
0
0
Ummm......It is already LAW in short your not allowed to have an opinion. If they are in civilians clothes in their homes they can express their feelings as they choose. A uniformed person can not show disrespect of any kind to the CIC unless this has changed recently.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Jeff S.
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
CW5 Roy Rucker Sr., Were you saying the same thing when G.W. was President?
(0)
Comment
(0)
CW5 Roy Rucker Sr.
CW5 Roy Rucker Sr.
>1 y
I sure did! Are you asking me this because you assume I'm a Democrat or is it because I just happen to be of African American Descent or both combined? I have answered the same question a few times in this forum.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Capt Jeff S.
>1 y
Was our Commander-in-Chief fully vetted for his position? Or was he installed without being properly investigated. I have my doubts as to whether this country has a duly elected leader. My problem has nothing to do with his race. For example, I think Allen West and Dr. Ben Carson are true patriots. It wouldn't bother me a bit if either of those two men were leading this country. As for Obama, he has yet to establish his identity with anything other than computer generated forgeries. I don't care if corrupt politicians declare him eligible. In fact, they know he's not. That's why Nancy Pelosi stripped the words "Constitutionally qualified" from her endorsement. Their corrupt actions do not give him any sense of legitimacy; rather, their actions simply implicate them in the scandal as willing accomplices in perpetrating the greatest fraud ever pulled off on the American people since Chester Arthur, an Irish immigrant that squatted in the Oval Office. Arthur's ineligibility was not discovered until AFTER his death. In the case of Obama, it's pretty evident he's not eligible. While the direct evidence has been destroyed and replaced with manufactured evidence, the circumstantial evidence is all there. The ONLY thing keeping Obama in office is that we have an impotent Congress that refuses to do anything about it -- because it would expose both parties as being complicit in knowing there were problems with Obama's eligiblity and yet they did nothing about it. [More than likely Republicans were afraid of being accused of being racist and instead caved to political correctness.] Too many people in DC have too much to lose if they try to do something now.

By his actions, the squatter in the White House has demonstrated that he is not a fan of our Constitution which he has been flagrantly disregarding and undermining. If you consider what he has accomplished while in office, it's pretty clear that his loyalties aren't to our Constitution or a sovereign America. He has aided and abetted our enemies. By virtually every definition of the word, it is crystal clear that Obama has committed treason. Just because it has yet to be proven in court doesn't change what is. History will absolve me in these matters.

Try as this Administration might to keep its ugly secrets shrouded in darkness, the dark deeds of this Administration WILL be exposed one day. And those who supported it are going to be shamed for being nothing more than useful idiots that were easily duped by empty promises of "Hope and Change," by the Socialist Progressive elitists they elected. The goals of this Administration have been to shred our Constitution, strip us of our rights and means to resist their tyranny, and proceed "Forward" with plans for transform this nation into a bankrupt socialist welfare state. Instead of having a government that answers to us, we ALL will answer to our government. They want to subjugate our nation to the authority of a small ruling class of Progressive elitists (aka Globalists aka THEM!) They believe they have been given a mandate to think for the rest of us and the right to impose their will on us, by any means necessary.

Conspiracy theory? Or Conspiracy REALITY?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Todd Halverson
0
0
0
Hell yes. They may not like the person, but they still have to respect him as their CIC.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT Aaron Barr
0
0
0
Yes, as provided for under Article 88 of the UCMJ and under those circumstances only.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Luis Mendez
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
At least an Article 15 could be applied. Do they still do those in today AVM?
Yet again IMHO this is another Test/Sample of the lower quality of recruits the AVA gets, and of the incredible extents the Military now is going, to retain the few that join. And BTW, let me assure you it was Worst in the late 70's.

We wouldn't be having this discussion in the Military and others like: women in Combat, homosexuals/transgenders, Bergdahl, Manning et al. etc. if there was a DRAFT. Back in the days ALL of these were inconceivable and absolutely unnecessary. Simply 'cause for every undesirable/unfit, the DRAFT could and DID find/provide ten (10) that were Fit.

Napoleon Bonaparte was Right in every sense when he Created the Modern Draft and said: "Every man is a defender of the Country". The DRAFT is also Scriptural. Some of the accusations that were brought on against the DRAFT were NOT resolved at all by the AVA. Not only that, these undisciplined misfits are being paid 15 times more plus Bonuses. Incredible!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Battalion S 1 Oic
0
0
0
Chief, you're right. And yes they should. As long as it's actual disrespect, and not people taking offense at differing opinions. I'm not sure what the exact rule for enlisted members is, but I know for officers there's actually an article of the UCMJ dedicated to this question, I want to say it's Article 88. This is why I express my political thoughts as generalizations and never as specific criticisms of a person, so that way I can avoid any kind of situation like that.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Jim Woods
0
0
0
So you can't have an opinion? Or just can't express your opinion no matter what the format?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Packy Flickinger
0
0
0
Yes. But that changes the second they get out!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Maj Assistant Director Of Operations
0
0
0
If I can be reprimanded for disrespecting my squadron commander it makes sense that the same should be done for disrespecting the boss of my bosses!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Michael Glenn
0
0
0
I believe the best way to go about this whole business is to ask oneself...Self... would you like to be put into the situation of having to go to your hometown and go door to door to the people who respect you and have known you all your life and demand they hand over their guns to you and your unit. Or tell them that some are being removed from the community because your boss feels they are substandard and that they will be replaced by muslim radicals, That all flags are to be removed from open display and no religion other than a muslim based one will be allowed in your town anymore and if the time comes take up arms against your hometown and barricade them either in or out. When we can walk up to a vet and tell them that they no longer mean anything to this country and that their care and thanks for all they have done is no longer. When we can openly admit that we would have no issues doing any of the above then we can say that this CIC deserves respect. Until then, he will get the respect he deserves, NONE!!!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close