Posted on Mar 6, 2017
Do you think President Obama could have ordered (covertly or overtly) wire-tapping of then President-Elect Trump?
193K
8.89K
1.88K
1K
1K
2
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 554
Of course he did. He wanted Hillary to carry on his agenda. He didn't count on the American people to tell Hillary to piss off.
(5)
(0)
Sgt Ari Maayan
Actually the American people didn't tell Hillary to piss off. More than 3 million voted for Hillary than for Trump.
(1)
(0)
SSgt Wayne Graff
You know, with all of the multiple voters and illegals that voted, there were probably a lot less than you think there were. She is history and that is where she belongs. If she were president this country would've been history.
(0)
(0)
SP5 Dennis Dorsey
SSgt Wayne Graff - illegals that voted,
And there lies the problem. You have drank the kool-aid without any proof.
And there lies the problem. You have drank the kool-aid without any proof.
(0)
(0)
SSgt Wayne Graff
SP5 Dennis Dorsey - Actually there was proof that thousands of illegal votes were cast. Although most of them were by dead democrats. It seems when you die you become a democrat. You may want to start doing some actual fact checking. I believe Judicial Watch did an investigation as well as James O'Keeffe, the guy who does all of the under cover investigations. So, no I haven't drank any freakin kool-aide and I do know what I am talking about.
(0)
(0)
Yes I think he could have ordered the wiretapping; however, I think it would have been done in such a a way to never have any evidence point back to him.
(5)
(0)
He's not my president anymore. He didn't keep a single promise and didn't do much of anything right, I'd be surprised if he managed to do a successful order for taps.
(5)
(0)
PO3 John Wagner
MSG Mr Mann - Once again I find you expressing yourself like a juvenile know it all. I am sure there are plenty of liberal campus websites inhabited by troglodytes with unexamined lives who can be your cheerleaders.
If you can't find any more eloquent ways of expressing your dissatisfaction then I am of the opinion that it would be polite of you to find somewhere else to express them.
Please feel free to do so.
If you can't find any more eloquent ways of expressing your dissatisfaction then I am of the opinion that it would be polite of you to find somewhere else to express them.
Please feel free to do so.
(1)
(0)
Just heard this with new info on the FBI. Not to worry, nothing here walk on by. Give Hillary a big wet one, Director Comey.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/http://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/fbi-once-planned-to-pay-former-british-spy-who-authored-controversial-trump-dossier/2017/02/28/896ab470-facc-11e6-9845-576c69081518_story.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/http://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/fbi-once-planned-to-pay-former-british-spy-who-authored-controversial-trump-dossier/2017/02/28/896ab470-facc-11e6-9845-576c69081518_story.html
FBI once planned to pay former British spy who authored controversial Trump dossier
The arrangement fell apart but shows that U.S. investigators viewed Christopher Steele as credible.
(5)
(0)
Trump is the proven liar and owned by Putin. The fact that there are so many trolls here leads me to think it's time to leave lest my presence somehow reinforces the forum's credibility.
(4)
(0)
The person calling president obama a “known liar” is a complete moron, there has not been any evidence that he lied at any point in his tenure
(4)
(0)
Despite my opinion, tapping did occur. It doesn't matter what the reason is. If they were concerned that Russian interference was happening, where is the proof that the Clinton campaign was equally tapped? It is clear BHO wanted to know what was going on but you can guarantee he did this indirectly for deniability sake. The political lean of the DOJ, CIA, and FBI should scare the crap out of normal law abiding Americans.
(4)
(0)
1SG Jeffrey Mullett
What proof, other than Trump's whining is there that any tapping occurred?
NO one has brought any to the table.
Trump wanted an investigation, but there was no substantiation, besides it was an obvious deflection from his nefarious activities. He has the Federal authorities in his pocket, so if there were any truth to it, it would have come out long before now.
NO one has brought any to the table.
Trump wanted an investigation, but there was no substantiation, besides it was an obvious deflection from his nefarious activities. He has the Federal authorities in his pocket, so if there were any truth to it, it would have come out long before now.
(0)
(0)
Oh, yeah, no question. I believe that the whole idea was to get Hillary in office so they could secretly begin a take over and remove the Constitutional protection and limits, he was already doing so before hand. That and giving the Dems more fists so they could appear to be the party of change.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next