Posted on Mar 6, 2017
SCPO Weapons Department Enlisted Advisor
192K
8.89K
1.88K
1K
1K
2
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 554
SSG Mark Franzen
9
9
0
I THINK Donald J Trump is trying to take the pressure off of Jeff Sessions but I don't think the President Obama would do that be Trump is Going hang himself for he has done wait until the Investgation is over with. I say what he Said lock him up lock him up lock him up.
(9)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Chad Thompson-Smith
8
8
0
Do you think a bunch of blowhard officers (and dipshit enlisted racist rednecks) can get through the day without trash talking Barrack Obama? No a chance
(8)
Comment
(0)
SrA Robert Adams
SrA Robert Adams
3 y
Sounds like a racist thing to say about the enlisted folks
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Craig Newton
8
8
0
The better question is whether the current president coluded with the Russian government to win the election. Sadly, the more evidence we see the more it looks like he did. Which is worse? Investigating a criminal election campaign or treason?
(8)
Comment
(0)
SPC Brian Stephens
SPC Brian Stephens
5 y
The Mueller report cleared the President of collusion with the Russians. Sadly, Mueller and team did not go into Hillary's collusion with the Russians through GPS and Christopher Steele to do the same.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Brian Stephens
SPC Brian Stephens
5 y
SSG Craig Newton Perhaps that fire is coming from the bathroom server. .
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Jeffrey Mullett
1SG Jeffrey Mullett
3 y
SPC Brian Stephens - Sorry, I don't know what plant you're smoking, but the Mueller Report contained 11 Sealed indictments for Congress to move forward on. It did NOT clear Trump of anything. In contrast, the Senate, who refused to hear from witnesses who were privy to the phone call Trump was Impeached for and those who were witness to other criminal behavior of Donald Trump, were not allowed to be heard, by Mitch McConnell and other key Republican Senators. You need to clean whatever is between your ears, because you are gathering dust in there.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Brian Stephens
SPC Brian Stephens
3 y
1SG Jeffrey Mullett Sorry, Jeff, but based on what we have all found and the evidence on the table, we would all love to know what YOU are smoking.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
8
8
0
More likely, the NSA and others collect a boatload of metadata and someone with an ax to grind and access went on a fishing expedition, found some stuff that would be embarrassing to POTUS, then leaked it (true or not) to the press.
This, if true, violates a number of federal statutes and is a felony... probably several.
The list of folks with access is pretty short, so identifying the leaker shouldn't be terribly difficult.
(8)
Comment
(0)
CW4 Craig Urban
CW4 Craig Urban
5 y
Yes. He and jimmy will not have a good legacy. I am a numbers guy. Obama was the 44th president. In Japan the number four is the kiss of death. What happened on the 4th. Bombing of pearl harbour. 4th of July. So Obama is a double bubble. Bubbles come out of his mouth. I was born September 1948. Labor day.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
5 y
CW4 Craig Urban - I'm trying to follow. I get numerology. But Pearl Harbor happened on 7 December. The 4th of July sounds like a pretty good day unless you are a British Empire sympathizer.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CW4 Craig Urban
CW4 Craig Urban
5 y
I wonder why the number 4 is bad then,? Maybe that is when the Japanese envoy showed up in d.c.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Michael Tierney
SPC Michael Tierney
4 y
CW4 Craig Urban - Amazingly stupid.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Platoon Sergeant
7
7
0
Just like sparring with trumpies there wont be much point to argue with some of these "gentlemen." However I ask this simple question, "if you are the president and the FBI, CIA, or other agency charged with the protection of the nation pick up information between an American and a known adversary, wouldn't it be in the best interest of national security to at least make sure the traffic is benign? I'm sure these fine Americans would say yes. It may turn out that is exactly the case. Since so many of the transition team have been indicted or already to have been found guilty it starting to look like prison, and not Christmas for them. Who else?
(7)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Wayne Graff
SSgt Wayne Graff
5 y
Never mind the fact that they were illegally spied on by their government, or that the information was pure unadulterated bullshit.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Robert Turcic
7
7
0
Absolutely, as a Naval Officer in the Intelligence community and understanding presidential powers, FISA courts, and tapping requirements, I have no doubt in my mind that there were shenanigans going on from both parties. If the Obama administration was so great and honest, then they never would have the changed the dictionary definitions purposely for facism or we would have had an actual raise that would have brought us up to the standard of living. Right now we are behind by at least 3% and I’m sorry, by liberal ideology was never supportive of the military, government civilians, or law enforcement and we saw this proof. I’ve been in for almost 28 year Enlisted and Officer to present and I can also say without a doubt that everything ended when Bush Junior took over, when we went from moderate Republicans and Democrats to the far left and right wing ideologies. This is a primary reason I support term limits to control the swamp and get fresh faces to help being us a modernized and fresh ideology. The POTUS and parties should support us although we support the constitution and not one specific party and obey our Commander in Chief, even if we do not support them.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Kevin Dougherty
7
7
0
Sadly, it is all to plausible, and the evidence does seem to point that direction. Will the truth come out? Probably not. The deck certainly seems stacked against that.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 John Wagner
7
7
0
He might not have come up with the idea but you can bet your ass he was aware of it.
I have little doubt of his culpability.
As I stated in another post I will be delighted to at least see him answering questions in front of a judiciary committee with attorney by his side.
(7)
Comment
(0)
PO3 John Wagner
PO3 John Wagner
7 y
MSG Mr Mann - I would be delighted not to deal with former military members who are no doubt availing themselves of the free healthcare ...that they earned for their service..who can't seem to at least keep their opinions at least marginally polite when referring to the POTUS. I don't make up rude names for former President Obama even though I don't feel he was ever even qualified for the job..and in eight years did nothing to improve my opinion. I am not aware that the president of the United States is less eligible to exercise his first amendment rights than anyone else.. including yourself.
Indeed, part of his oath of office is to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States. So to your Sir I say, come back and talk to me when you can express yourself in a more adult fashion.
Thanks in advance.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Robert Laity
PO3 Robert Laity
>1 y
PO3 John Wagner - One does not abrogate his or her first amendment rights merely because he or she is "availing themselves" of Veterans medical care. Furthermore, veterans health care has never been and is not now "Free". Veterans earn their VA healthcare. I worked for the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare system. If you are referring to Obama as "POTUS" you are wrong again. There is no 'President' Obama: http://www.thepostemail.com/09/17/2010/there-is-no-president-obama/ Obama not only violated the oath of office he took. He knew that he was an imposter and a fraud. He knew that he was not constitutionally eligible to be President. That he usurped the Presidency by fraud, during a time of war made Obama both a traitor and a spy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Mikel Dawson
7
7
0
Of course it is possible. Look at his track record.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SGM Mikel Dawson
SGM Mikel Dawson
7 y
MSG Mr Mann - Yep, one of the best at dividing our country the worst I've seen since the '60s. Best as bowing down to others. Giving money and support to radical nations (Iran), great at running guns and weapons. Yes, he was good.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
6
6
0
Of course he could have! The point here is that multiple investigations have shown he didn't despite Fox News reporting.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close