Does it matter if I don't have a combat patch?
</font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">I really getting tired of hearing that If you don't go
and get your Combat Patch, <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>you will not
make it in the Army. What's with that? I've been on 5 rosters and taken off all
5. But been sent to Firs, Hurricanes and Tornados. So getting deployed domestically
does not count.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I'm starting to believe
that everyone that has there Combat Patch, are a little upset that they had to
go. I never turned down or gotten out of one. So I'm passed up because of this.
I would never tell some to go volunteer to go to Combat, <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>and then have to live with them not making it
or coming back messed up. If you get sent then you get sent. If not, well then
you don't. Makes me a bad leader? I don't think so. My NCOERS don't say I am.
Stop telling everyone to get deployed.. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Sorry,
my 2cents for today. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">
</font>

Sir, Bit of an open
ended question. What did they do. Did they run an office? Go on combat
missions? work in the motor pool? What about someone that never fired there weapon
at all. verses a Soldier that as. Do they get a NCOER in a combat zone? And
what does it say? I know someone that was Deployed 4 time blow up 2 times and
has a new shoulder. You can say no, he's not a effected leader with the issues
he as. Which in his case I can understand. It should be a performance based.
Not combat based. I have this told to me directly, that I need to go on a
deployment to make E-8. I don't believe that at all. If they're going to look at a Soldier, under the Combat or Not. Then why have a
NCOER?? And I guess saving lives and helping in Firs, Hurricanes and Tornados domestically
does not count. And all the new Soldier coming in, there
never going have a change. With the War ending and all. Again it's just my
2cents.
In saying that you have to understand that it may be looked upon negatively since the war went on for roughly 12 years. I know a former MSG that was upset because he was not selected for SGM and passed up by peers and subordinates but he had never deployed in a leadership position and that's what they were looking for.
The following is an attribute breakdown of those selected for SFC:
1. 100% of selectees had Section Sergeant time
averaging 30.4 months
2. 46% of selectees had Platoon Sergeant time
averaging 14.8 months
3. 98% population had completed some college
the overall average numbers of college credits earned was 68.9
23% had earned an Associate’s Degree
11% had earned a Bachelor Degree
0% had earned a Master Degree
10. The average selectee had 26.4 months of deployed (combat operations) time
100% had combat service
as little as 9 months in a combat theater
as many as 55 months in a combat theater
The fact is for the Engineer Regiment as it stands now a combat tour is mandatory for promotion. There maybe that special snowflake scenario where you can get promoted as an Engineer without combat time but I wouldn't tell my guys to count on it.