Posted on Aug 18, 2015
How would you handle something as ridiculous as this?
5.94K
61
42
3
3
0
Uniforms
Issues
Responses: 16
8
8
0
CMSgt (Join to see)
SFC (Join to see) - CSM (Join to see)
Are you bagging on my Resting B*tch Face syndrome, SFC Conway? The struggle is real. ;)
Are you bagging on my Resting B*tch Face syndrome, SFC Conway? The struggle is real. ;)
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
CMSgt (Join to see) - Not at all.. It was for the struggle of finding the right shoes
(0)
(0)
(1)
(0)
4
4
0
"You're out of uniform. Those boots are a safety concern. Go fix it now. We'll discuss your judgement when you get back."
1) Identify the problem.
2) Correct the problem.
3) Make sure the problem doesn't happen again.
Remember, we need to get back to "safety" before we light the person up. If we light him up and something happens from the time you identified the problem, and the time you corrected the problem it is on YOU.
1) Identify the problem.
2) Correct the problem.
3) Make sure the problem doesn't happen again.
Remember, we need to get back to "safety" before we light the person up. If we light him up and something happens from the time you identified the problem, and the time you corrected the problem it is on YOU.
(4)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS Brother there are times when you need to just jack someone up for being dumb and this would be one of them.
(3)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
SGM Steve Wettstein Oh, I'm not saying don't jack them up. I'm saying correct the problem first, THEN jack them up.
If someone isn't wearing mandatory safety equipment (which foot protection is), you tell them to put it on (or at the minimum, remove them from the situation), then you deal with the "underlying" problem.
Taken to an extreme example, if we're on a range and someone is in an "unsafe condition" (whatever that may be), do you go off on them first, or get them (and others) safe first?
If someone isn't wearing mandatory safety equipment (which foot protection is), you tell them to put it on (or at the minimum, remove them from the situation), then you deal with the "underlying" problem.
Taken to an extreme example, if we're on a range and someone is in an "unsafe condition" (whatever that may be), do you go off on them first, or get them (and others) safe first?
(6)
(0)
4
4
0
SGM Steve Wettstein
CSM (Join to see) IMO they need to be jacked up and made to cry. But that's just me.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google