Posted on Feb 14, 2015
CSM Command Sergeant Major IN
73.6K
700
379
35
17
18
Religious questions/discussions have/are causing problems in RP. Most responses/comments are respectful; however, some posts are not and members are personally attacking other members.

If this issue is not dealt with expeditiously, RP stands to lose a lot of good members. We have plenty of other topics - ban all religious topics.

Edit as of 6,976 views, 1,228 votes and 491 responses/comments:

My intent with this question was to engage RP members in a discussion concerning in what I believe to be an increasing trend of unprofessional and disrespectful comments. I wanted people to arrive at the conclusion that banning a topic was not the answer, but rather doing something about the individuals making the unprofessional and/or disrespectful comments. In addition to that, I was hoping many members would not only identify the problem being individuals, but also come up with suggestions about how to deal with those individuals.

It is more than having a thick skin - we all have a military background and know what it means to be professional and respectful - it is my opinion there is no room here for members to be threatened, taunted or belittled. We can discuss any topic, agree to disagree, and verbalize our opinion or point of view without having to go there.

I realize there are already ways to report members on RP. Getting additional ideas and suggestions for improvements can never hurt, and most importantly, if we would police our own, giving down votes on unprofessional/disrespectful comments, and calling these individuals out, we can hopefully get them to change their behavior or help RP admins identify the ones who might need to take a break or be banned.

Last and certainly no the least, I am a devoted Christian, and would never support a ban on any topic. I know my question said that, but go back and read why I did it that way.
Posted in these groups: World religions 2 Religion2dcac4a3 RallyPoint
Edited 11 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 158
2LT Scott Armstrong
1
1
0
I'd rather ban practitioners of unprofessional conduct than a basic tenant of the Constitution. As a practical matter, current conflicts are mired in religion so it is a tough topic to avoid
(1)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Eddy Vleugels
CW3 Eddy Vleugels
11 y
I'm all for banning both.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
I've been on several sites that start out friendly and has interesting subjects as does RP. Then someone gets their feelings hurt and the word wars begin. I lose interest right away and drop them like a hot potato. I enjoy the discussions we have here and so far no one has attacked me for my right to freedom of speech. If there are any on this site that consistently pisses off someone who expresses their opinion, then they should be banned before this wonderful place to vent or tell a story, will fold up sooner than later because that's not why we joined and we will leave. IMHO The End.
(0)
Reply
(0)
2LT Scott Armstrong
2LT Scott Armstrong
11 y
I don't let keyboard rangers bother me. Ignore them and they tend to go elsewhere. Fighting unworthy opponents is a waste of time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC John Wilson
LTC John Wilson
11 y
Strength in your beliefs makes you a stronger debater of any topic!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Howard Kempf
1
1
0
Disagree with you. I agree with John that censorship has never been and never will be the answer. I think a healthy discussion along any lines is appropriate provide that both parties accord themselves intelligently, respectfully and maturely. I think the onus is on us to police ourselves and if someone steps out of line, report to the admin and let them handle the situation.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Company Commander (Hhc, Cyber Protection Brigade)
1
1
0
Edited 11 y ago
Maybe a small solution is not to ban it, but maybe avoid the votes on it. Its just a suggestion. The problem with the up or down vote is that an unpopular idea would be voted against, therefore... the fear of negative votes act as form of censorship. But as others point out, enforce that... you may have to force it across other topics. Maybe an idea is that topics that are offbeat should be organized in a certain area of Rally Point. Just suggesting an idea.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CSM Command Sergeant Major IN
CSM (Join to see)
11 y
A very interesting idea CPT (Join to see) that I believe has a lot of merit. I still would like to see the threatening, ridiculing and hateful responses stop and everyone to be respectful to each other.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Company Commander (Hhc, Cyber Protection Brigade)
CPT (Join to see)
11 y
CSM (Join to see), agreed. Everyone here is a service member who should have the upmost respect for one another. Regardless, it's always one team one fight.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Michael Selbach
Sgt Michael Selbach
11 y
Just being the devils advocate here so here go's...its all a matter of perspective if its threatening ridiculing or hateful Q.T.I.P. quit taking it personal no one will ever be swayed by you. Only you cant sway if something rings true and that will be you saying so.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
1
1
0
After living in this world for fifty years we need to talk about religion. We need to talk about politics. We need to unite in what we have in common and ignoring it will not help. The ones who leave RP need time to learn and grow. Perhaps You can teach them. I can teach them or we can teach them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Robert Ishoy
1
1
0
I understand your position on this, however when we ban any topic you lose the idea of free thought and healthy debate. There are just a few topics that people in general are passionate about. They are politics, religion, family and yes sex. We have been told many times to avoid these topics. But what does that leave you with, the weather. If you ban topics of major importance in most peoples lives then your discussions become very trivial and then this site is no better than facebook. Instead of banning a topic require a standard to the discussions. No personal attacks, discussions should remain intelligent, thought provoking, and respectful. If you don't know how to be persuasive in a ethical way check out The Secret Art of Persuasion lessons at http://secretsop.com/. yes that was a plug, but my point is that instead of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, let's have healthy open debates for positive results. Thomas Jefferson wrote "I swear upon the alter of God any form of tyranny over the minds of men."
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Joshua H.
1
1
0
So CSM (Join to see), just because you don't agree with religious questions/discussions you would like them banned? Sorry, I took the same oath as you to protect and defend the Constitution, and last I checked we had freedom of speech AND religion.

I would think as a vet you would have thick enough skin to deal with topics you might not agree with.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Retired
1
1
0
Edited 11 y ago
Toxicpeople
CSM Jim Dula, I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. However that doesn't mean I don't think we need to do something about people who are obviously spoiling for a fight. When you detect someone trying to start a fight, post a big TROLL in response and unfollow the post.

Those who want to argue with the troll can. Those who want to suck up to eachother can as well. But it's just possible that we can teach civilized behavior to trolls without banning them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGM Retired
SGM (Join to see)
11 y
LCpl Joseph Lundgren, I don't think a discussion over the definition of a troll is off-topic. What is the first thing done before going into battle? (Not a trick question, but it's possible you didn't experience it because of your rank.) It's called Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield.

Doesn't that mean I think this is a battle? No, but it does mean that you have to have some idea how your opponent fights, what is points are, what his motivations and tactics are, if you expect to win. So does that mean I think this is a battle to win? Again, NO, but an acceptable question at this point might be, "What constitutes a win?"

If shutting down the troll is a win, then you might be correct. But my definition of troll is bigger than yours and includes those who aren't just in this to start a fight and are blind to the concept that insisting on their belief is troll-ism.

If you insist that trolls are exclusively those who want nothing more than to start a fight, then we will have to agree to disagree. But as I read the posts I quoted above, I do not see people just trying to start a fight, but misguided people who are blinded to the difference between browbeating and discussion.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
11 y
Trolls are people too, or were people, or could still be people. Like the conversion of St. Paul.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
Oh my gosh! This is getting ridiculous. Now we're on Islam, real religion or not. It is what it is and I don't understand it anymore than a lot of you do. KKK thought they were right in their convictions on Jews, blacks, and any white person who disagreed. Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one and that is their right in this country. Let's move on, please.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Michael Selbach
Sgt Michael Selbach
11 y
I believe that opinions are like orgasms...Mine is more important and I don't care if you have one...it was the Troll I swear!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Richard Sloniker
1
1
0
censorship
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Jay Jones
1
1
0
CSM Jim Dula, I truly understand your concern and fully respect what you are saying. There is not one person here on Rally Point did not that raise his/her hand took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. One of the foundations of this document is "Freedom of Speech". If we cannot as brothers and sisters who have defended this country honor this document, who can? I would prefer to see Rally Point members insist that discussions be conducted with respects. I am a Conservative Democrat. I support our President. I have endured a lot of criticism and name calling because of this. I don't have a problem with people disagreeing me. What I do have a problem with is when people become disagreeable. If we can find a way to keep people from being disagreeable on any discussion, then I think we are headed to where Rally Point truly wants us to be.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CSM Command Sergeant Major IN
CSM (Join to see)
11 y
Sgt Jay Jones thanks for your remarks. We are a lot alike in our beliefs. I originally started this thread in the hope to generate interest and awareness of the disrespectful tone being used by several members, getting people to agree banning any topic was wrong, but banning people who are disrespectful or threatening should be the ones banned. I also hoped to get other member to call out members they saw being disrespectful of threatening, policing our own if you will, and/or getting additional ideas for the admins/owner to incorporate into RP to address the problem.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
11 y
Sgt Jones, I understand what you are referring to with the criticism and name-calling. You know I tend to be a rather objective person, with some subjective view-points on occasion, so I can tell you I heavily disagree with any name-calling, insults, inflammatory language or lies stated by anyone regardless of who they are, who they support or their own ideology. I know there are some others on here who feel the same way although they may not be as vocal as I am, especially with the down-voting which I admit I am probably one of the most ardent users of said function. What I am curious about is where is the respect for conservatives who do NOT support the President? Many of us have been called vile names, slandered, or called racist nearly every time we state something critical of President Obama. Is that truly an honest way to engage in civil, adult dialogue or just the emotional way to shut down any true discussion? As I alluded to above, I will support and defend anyone on here against vile language (whether insults, falsehoods, or name-calling) as you know I have done so with you.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Jay Jones
Sgt Jay Jones
11 y
SSG Andres Redondo, I know your character and I fully respect it. I have never called anyone on Rally Point names. If you disagree with me about the President, that is your right and I will defend your right to not like his Presidency. You have defended me in the past against accusations and name calling and even with I consider veiled threats. I truly appreciate that and respect you more, because you can disagree with me and still defend me. You are a true man of character and I have the highest respect for you and your opinion even though we may not always agree.

CSM Jim Dula, thank you for raising this issue. The issue is not banning topics, but banning or as SSG Andres Redondo has done, police our own.

You gentlemen have a wonderful day and keep those discussions coming, they allow me to keep my mind active. I am a 100% Disabled Veteran due to my exposure to Agent Orange when I was in Vietnam. Some people would look at me and some of my postings and think there is nothing wrong with me. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Agent Orange cause several conditions. The two I am dealing with the most are Dementia and Parkinson's. I have had civilian doctors and VA doctors confirm this. My IQ use to be 142. However, with my short term memory failing me the way it does, my IQ is down to approximately 126 now. Some would say that is not being disabled, but yes it is. My short term memory is very bad. The VA stopped me from driving, I also had been labeled "incompetent to handle my affairs". My wife has to make all financial decisions and I had to get rid of my Colt Python 357 Magnum with a 2 1/2 inch barrel. I'm saying all of this to say, it is important to me to keep my mind active. Rally Point helps me do that. Therefore I would be against any kind of "Topic" restrictions, but wholeheartedly support "RESPECT" one for another, even if you disagree with them.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Stephen Browning
Sgt Stephen Browning
11 y
Sgt Jay Jones, i would like to thank you for your openness about the issues you are facing because of your service of each of us. It is exactly for this reason that we must all respect one another.we have many in this community that have earned respect for their service and personal sacrifice.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Steven Kuhn
1
1
0
CSM (Join to see) the good thing about being in America is that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights. I am not quoting the Bible or using religion, just our precious Constitution and it guarantees us freedom of speech. I do not feel that any subject should be taboo, as long as we can respect the individual posting or responding to the question, and we can stick to the subject and refrain from attacking the person or topic. We are all active duty or retired military personnel who have had to endure some pretty harsh situations in the performance of our duties. If we are going to lose a lot of good members because of a topic then maybe they are not such good members after all because they will lobby to have their way and take away another individual's freedom. The great thing about RallyPoint is we are conversing and sharing our ideas with people we should be able to respect: people who have put their lives on the line for the freedoms we enjoy in America! And here you come with a veiled threat that RallyPoint will lose a whole bunch of members if we do not heed your warning and ban discussion on religion. If you do not want to be a part of the conversation, then you are free not to comment. If you disagree with a viewpoint, you can discuss it via posts in a manner that expresses respect for the individual's viewpoint and perspective. While I will agree with you (from personal experience) that the discussions revolving around religion can become heated, it is not the topic but the lack of respect and maturity of the people involved in the discussion. If we who fight for the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution try and boycott or subvert them in a way such as you are proposing, we are doing a great disservice to those who lost their lives or livelihood defending the Constitution. You and I took an oath to support and defend that document (and the ideals it contains) against all enemies foreign and domestic and that oath has no expiration date. I would hope that you would consider this a respectful comment to your post. For the record, I firmly believe in God, and know as a record of historical fact that our country was founded on the foundation of the Christian faith by men who followed their faith and put their lives on the line because of it. I believe that we should honor the right of every person to express their faith, feelings and opinions as long as these do not involve the imminent harm to another person or our country. May God bless you with a wonderful day!

r/

Steve
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close