Posted on Jan 19, 2017
LTC Operations Officer (Opso)
17.8K
60
21
4
4
0
1a336392
For those who served in both a leadership position and on staff which was more stressful to you? Some would argue leadership as you are in charge of and are responsible for others. Some would argue that staff is due to not being in charge. What are your thoughts?
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 17
CAPT Kevin B.
1
1
0
Thought I knew stress having done both sides. Depending on what you're doing, it's a different type of stress, but still stress. Then all that pales when you get that Skipper job and have total responsibility for a lot of people thrown into different areas of the world. Force protection becomes very personal to you. I'd get the double whammy of being tasked mission without force protection. That would stress and set me off pushing back upline. It caused me not to make flag, but I got mission done and brought my people home. That results in far less stress for the rest of your life. So if you don't stress over keeping your people alive, punch out because you're too risky to have around.
(1)
Comment
(0)
LTC Operations Officer (Opso)
LTC (Join to see)
9 y
CAPT Kevin B. I agree it can be extremely stressful when you are responsible for the lives of those who serve under your command. I found that though there was stress I think you get more reward out of being a leader and that helps manage and appear to lower the stress. On staff it is just non-stop PowerPoints, OPORDs, meetings, and not much in the way of reward as you are not able to directly promote, give awards, etc. that you can when you are a commander.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
1
1
0
LTC (Join to see) I think I got 90% of my white hair from my time in staff and all the b.s. that comes along with it
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Mark Gonzalez
1
1
0
Leaders work through direct lines and get things done. Much of staff work is dotted lines and you are forced to invest a lot of non value added admin time to get things done, because your position does or does not have any real authority. Granted building buy-in is important, but command is infinitely better than staff.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Battalion Maintenance Officer (Bmo)
1
1
0
One does not stop being a Leader based upon duty title. Leadership is stressful because one cares. Staff is stressful because no one cares. It's quite the conundrum.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Jim Coe
Lt Col Jim Coe
9 y
Love your last sentence. I'm going to steal it!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Cameron M. Wesson
1
1
0
Team,

I have found that both are challenging in there own terms.

I will offer that I felt that I learned more as a Staff Officer/NCO and that made me a better leader.

But I would never.... ever... forget the honor and oppurtunity... yo lead the soldiers and civilians I have... regardless of the challenges. The jobs were intrinsically rewarding... and help me grow.

my 2 cents

peace out
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
1
1
0
Never was an Officer, Can't say. I can comment though that having served on 2 Admirals Staffs and in Direct Support of 1. Staff Duty definitely has it's Perks for Enlisteds are Treated Much Better on Staff Commands. At CINCPACFLT and COMSPAWARSYSCOM I walked on Water. Not so Much in "The Fleet".
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Contracting Officer
1
1
0
Edited 9 y ago
For me it was totally dependent on my superiors and subordinates. My stressful times where when I had leaders who's heads were echelons above reality, or subordinates that were toxic. When I had great coworkers everything was very easy, leadership vs staff really didn't matter so much as the individuals I worked with.

I do imagine responses to this question will ally with individual personality preferences.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close