0
0
0
I have been getting into this discussion with a few people lately and no one has been able to change my mind just yet. My position is that there is no unchanging and definite morality (e.g. a set of moral principles that, regardless of time, place, or culture remains unchanged and entirely understood). Rather, I believe that morality is changing and entirely depends on the time, place, culture, and utility. If it were beneficial to allow for murder and it allowed for the smoothest running society then we would have no problem with murder. For a real-world example, it was once perfectly acceptable to treat certain people as no more than equipment or animals to be used for physical labor; today, we understand that all human beings are valuable and should be treated as human beings. What do you believe? Is there an all-encompassing and permanent morality or is it dependent?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
SGT Joseph Gunderson I have pondered that question based on the very point you posted, Negros were property or chattel, once. In some states that law is still on the books. I cannot believe I am saying this but I have witnessed morality evolve or devolve with the culture of humanity. For me, personally, I believe and in my human capacity follow the Bible as my Soverign guide, as well as other religious, spiritual, moral, and secular instructions that guide towards the moral fiber I believe
(2)
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
SGT Robert Johnson I have witnessed this fact also. I believe this is one of the reasons so many weird acts are committed in the name of God and country. For me, it seems that humans attempt to improve on the divine and that seems to yield pain and suffering, instead of peace, prosperity, and sane living.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next