Posted on Dec 21, 2018
MSG Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
896K
9.79K
3.02K
1.9K
1.9K
2
Under Article 2 of the UCMJ, the Army maintains court-martial jurisdiction over retired personnel. Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice, states “Retired members of a regular component of the Armed Forces who are entitled to pay are subject to the provisions of the UCMJ.
Posted in these groups: 61c89c28 Donald TrumpOriginal Crime34198fd5 SpyingUcmj UCMJ
Avatar feed
Responses: 1377
LTC Gary Earls
990
988
2
So the FBI can lie to you and not be punished but if you lie to the FBI then you go to jail. Something is wrong here.
(990)
Comment
(2)
PO3 Jake Lucid
PO3 Jake Lucid
9 mo
LTC Gary Earls never just talk to law enforcement with out attorney.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Quentin Moore
SGT Quentin Moore
9 mo
Yes there is
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Levi Jackson
SPC Levi Jackson
5 mo
Fraizer vs Cupp Supreme Court ruling cops can lie to the public. Never trust a cop.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Jerry Lucas
CPT Jerry Lucas
2 mo
PO3 Jake Lucid - Even then, never talk to the police.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Lou Meza
627
627
0
I'm of the opinion that Gen. Flynn should not be punished twice for the same offense.
(627)
Comment
(0)
SGT Quentin Moore
SGT Quentin Moore
9 mo
I agree
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Quentin Moore
SGT Quentin Moore
9 mo
MAJ Byron Oyler its still unbecoming of a soldier
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Robert Walton
SFC Robert Walton
8 mo
LCDR James Jones - It depends on where you get the DUI. If it is on post the State will usually let the Military handle it. If it happens Down town you could face from the Military and the Local courts.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Mary Dungan
SSgt Mary Dungan
2 mo
SGT Quentin Moore - You'e right. He's a traitor and has/is participating in anti-American activities and propaganda. The fact that he still recieves a pension astounds me.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Lonny Randolph
377
376
1
So to be clear here... The General "told a lie" to the FBI while being investigated for evidence of a crime that never actually occurred? And are you advocating that the General should loose his benefits because he testified improperly in an investigation that had no basis in reality to begin with? To turn the table on this question, suppose someone accused you of beating your wife (we will assume this has never happened); there was no corroborating evidence but the police investigate anyway. In the course of your questioning you are asked what you ate for breakfast and you omitted to include the second cup of coffee you drank with creamer in it. Having obtained contradictory evidence from your eldest child, the police charge you with lying; so after being convicted in a plea deal wherein you provided testimony about your eldest child speeding the week previously - we should take your retirement check away from you... Cuz... you lied... about a fake investigation... that should never have even been started... Does this cover it?
(377)
Comment
(1)
PFC Rosanne Baisa
PFC Rosanne Baisa
>1 y
MSG (Join to see) My issue, since I know that LEO'S will and can lie to obtain evidence, is that the whole situation should have happened. The end.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Rosanne Baisa
PFC Rosanne Baisa
>1 y
PFC Rosanne Baisa nice that I put "not happened" but apparently my phone has other ideas. Have good morning!
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Ken Lowder
PO2 Ken Lowder
1 y
PO1 David Kingsley - TRUMP IS COLLUDING WITH THE RUSSIANS TO STEAL THE ELECTION! Oh, wait that was killery and companiy. Yet trumps presidency is forever tarnished by these lies and crimes
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Tom Walker
PO3 Tom Walker
1 mo
Exactly!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close