Posted on Sep 7, 2015
Military Times
83.7K
121
42
16
16
0
From: Military Times

RALEIGH, N.C. — Military prosecutors have reached into a section of military law seldom used since World War II in the politically fraught case against Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

Observers wondered for months if Bergdahl would be charged with desertion after the deal brokered by the U.S. to bring him home following years in Taliban captivity.

In addition to a desertion charge, Bergdahl is also accused of misbehavior before the enemy, a much rarer offense that carries a stiffer potential penalty in this case.

Bergdahl could face a life sentence if convicted of the charge, which accuses him of endangering fellow soldiers when he left and triggered search operations.

Misbehavior before the enemy was used hundreds of times during World War II, but scholars say its use appears to have dwindled in conflicts since then.

http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/2015/09/07/military-selects-rarely-used-charge-for-bowe-bergdahl-case/71837020/
Posted in these groups: Yqut7ywnypoexe7wlckn Desertion46ac8fde BergdahlUcmj UCMJOriginal Crime
Avatar feed
Responses: 21
SPC John Lanning
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
The sad part of this is that Bergdahl has become such a political football, the White House and his minions at the Puzzle Palace (which has consistently dragged their feet on this) will continue to stall for as long as possible. Obama has credibility tied into this jackass, so I can see one of two things......1) He will be forced to plead to some minor charges like being AWOL, or 2) after conviction, Obama will break out his "pen and phone" and pardon the guy on his last day in office.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Hmm, hadn't thought of that. Hopefully Obama will want to wash his hands with the verdict, and be done with it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Westin Sandberg
Cpl Westin Sandberg
>1 y
I think if Obama tries to pardon him, there will be an outrage in this country, his last day in office or not, it may be enough to spark a revolution.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Aaron Kletzing
2
2
0
Never even heard of this charge before. Pretty interesting.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC John Decker
2
2
0
Why would the punishment for Desertion be less than any other charge?
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC Christyal Ingram
SPC Christyal Ingram
>1 y
Because there is a difference between dodging your duties, and putting other soldiers in danger while looking for a "missing" soldier in a war zone.
(4)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SN Greg Wright
2
2
0
Good. Throw the book at this POS.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
2
2
0
Misbehavior before the enemy would be appropriate for the crime, pending he acted solely on his own accord. With politics, I don't see it going anywhere.
(2)
Comment
(0)
1stLt Steven P.
1stLt Steven P.
>1 y
Agreed, and another reason to keep politicians out of the chain of command as much as possible. This case should go through an Article 35 and then a full court martial in a normal procedure and timing.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Alex Robinson
2
2
0
He deserves life at Leavenworth for his criminal actions
(2)
Comment
(0)
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad
>1 y
At the very least ...
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Frederick Deraney
PO2 Frederick Deraney
>1 y
He clearly deserted and that cannot be disputed. Under Article 85 Desertion carries the maximum penalty of death during time of war. However, he must have worked something out because in this case the maximum sentence is five years in prison. His decision to serve was voluntary and his decision to desert was voluntary, the decision to enforce the maximum sentence under the UCMJ should not be voluntary.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Amn Joseph H.
1
1
0
Because accusations are made, even with admission, the entire due process must be allowed before a jury of his peers. Mitigating circumstances, meaningless to civilians could change the predetermined path of this trial yet, to military jury. Just not ready to throw a troop under the bus until he has had his day in court, then convicted by a jury of his peers. Anything less is not constitutional. And the exercise of the US Constitution is what our oaths demand we protect, no matter our emotional baggage:) That an a complete distrust of most elected members of our government:)
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Tom Follis
1
1
0
Immediate death. No 10-20 years on death row either. Convict today, die tomorrow.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Maj Mike Sciales
1
1
0
Edited 10 y ago
It's "rarely" used because we've never had anybody do that since Korea, maybe. He'll get an Special Courts-Martial, plead guilty, judge alone, get reduced to E-1, forfeit all pay and allowances, be discharged and that discharge will be characterized as a Bad Conduct Discharge. He just needs to go away.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David S.
1
1
0
Good Lord -can someone please put the God dang wheel back on the wagon so they can get his ass to court.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close