Posted on Sep 10, 2015
Oath Keepers intend to prevent US Marshalls from re-arresting Kim Davis. Where do you stand on their position?
8.22K
46
21
4
4
0
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/oath-keepers-send-armed-guards-protect-kim-davis-us-marshals
I know that there are a fair number of Oath Keepers in the military. Based on opinions I've read here regarding the Kim Davis situation, it doesn't appear that she is well supported by Servicemembers. How do you feel about the Oath Keepers statement that they would prevent U.S. Marshalls from re-arresting Davis if she were held in contempt of court again? Is the Judge overstepping his authority? Are the Oath Keepers straying "out of their lane" in stepping in on behalf of Kim Davis? What do the Oath Keepers here in this community think? Would you step in to stop US Marshalls in this case?
I know that there are a fair number of Oath Keepers in the military. Based on opinions I've read here regarding the Kim Davis situation, it doesn't appear that she is well supported by Servicemembers. How do you feel about the Oath Keepers statement that they would prevent U.S. Marshalls from re-arresting Davis if she were held in contempt of court again? Is the Judge overstepping his authority? Are the Oath Keepers straying "out of their lane" in stepping in on behalf of Kim Davis? What do the Oath Keepers here in this community think? Would you step in to stop US Marshalls in this case?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 16
Then, they would be breaking the law for assisting someone who broke the law. Two wrongs don't make a right.
(5)
(0)
Story as reported by "RawStory".
Oath Keepers put ‘boots on the ground’ to guard oath-breaking Kim Davis from ‘dictator’ judge
The Oath Keepers, an armed, camouflage-wearing volunteer militia famous for hunkering down at Bundy Ranch, now say they have “boots on the ground” to protect Kentucky clerk Kim Davis, who they believe was denied her right to a jury trial.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next