Our incoming CinC condoned behavior that's in conflict with SAPR. SHARP professionals, how should we address or respond to troops with this?

Sir, yours is the most reasonable response I've yet received. I'm still waiting to hear from someone in the SHARP field.

As in someone who works in the field of SH/SA prevention

You beat me to the same answer.

Thanks for posting a response to the actual question.

At least when Mr Trump said anything improper He owned up to it instead of the HRC approach of not answering the question at all o trying to blame it on someone else. The late President Truman came up with some real gems also, He owned up to them also and moved on. As harry Truman said, "The buck stops Here" President Truman was known for speaking His mind and being politically correct was never His way.

As I've stated throughout this discussion, I'm no fan of HRC. In fact, I'm relieved she not our first woman POTUS. That said, your point's moot because she won't be in our chain of command. I think as a country we have to stop embracing severely flawed leaders merely because we disagree with their opposition. Trump won fair and square. But that doesn't mean his behavior which was inconsistent with DoD's stated values shouldn't raise questions. In an extreme example, it's like saying at least Hitler didn't kill 20 million the way Stalin did. Neither's acceptable.

1SG(P) (Join to see) - the fact that it was 11 years ago and he apologized and said it was inappropriate, means that he has come to a new light, how many of use have said things in the past that we regret, also in reguards to the entertainment society take a good long look at beyoncee and her attire, mylie cyrus list can continue, I will not condem someone for their past transgretions but will support someone who has learned and risen above

I edited the question from "advocated" to "condoned".

Brought to you by the magic of google:
http://www.sexualassault.army.mil/
http://www.sapr.mil/

LTC Joseph Gross - sir interesting response, in my little neck of the woods Hobart college male student with accusation of rape dismissed from the college, when the dirt settled it was found that it was not rape, it was only because a so called rape advisor told her it was, the male was found not guilty by the law but he could not continue his education there or even see his own sister graduate, the people that investigated and decided this young mans future had no training but were willing to put his life away based on little to no evidence, SHARP/EO are good programs as long as the people in charge are trained as well as the counsellors/ reps/ investigators, otherwise its just check the block training

Crazy how many different viewpoints there are to this. No doubt the system will always be abused and there will be people who need the education they receive in the program. Sounds like another example where command and leadership needs to be actively involved and watch for abuse.