Posted on Nov 16, 2014
CPT Senior Instructor
103K
740
461
22
22
0
10520844 10152798473457383 4136090834948340113 n
I find this to be humorous and also a legitimate issue. Recently I was at large training compound with multiple units there, basically a "mock up" of a FOB. So while in the latrine some soldiers, that must have been in one of the support units there were talking. They were complaining about the soldiers from the infantry unit calling them "POGs." And without missing a beat someone yells from a stall in the same building "Shut up POG." I couldn't help but to laugh.

I usually don't care what you do in the Army as long as you are doing your job and are maintaining your professionalism. These units that we were running into were far below the expectations of maintaining professionislism. There were so many uniform violations our CSM had to wear blinders where ever he walked so he could make it there without correcting every soldier on the way. If he did he would never make where ever he was going. I was just wearing ACUs. It was a bit chilly but I saw a soldier with the ECWCS gen III level 7 jacket, aka the marshmallow jacket. With some sort of toboggan cap that was not anything to do with the army. There was no uniformity and it seemed like no one in their unit cared.

I am not calling anyone a POG in this post. I have our support personnel in our unit that we view as peers. They were harder than anyone in that other unit. They act like soldiers just like we do.

What is your take on this? Do you think they are asking for it by they way they are? Should anyone be called a POG? Should they be expected to maintain the same standard as everyone else in the Army? And what is their CSM doing when this is happening?
Posted in these groups: Dra60033 2 Combat ArmsImages 3 Support
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 148
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
1SG Unit Supply Specialist
0
0
0
Huh well I'm so un-hipp, prime & proper I just have to ask "what is a POG"??!!...Once I know that then maybe I can supply a good comment.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Pogue is pejorative military slang for non-combat, staff, and other rear-echelon or support units. "Pogue" frequently includes those who don't have to undergo the stresses that the infantry does.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Unit Supply Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
Ok thanks for the clarity
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Operations Specialist
0
0
0
We unanimously voted to roll on Red Air out of Camp Victory due to the extreme POG ness.

So you could call it person's other than grunts. you would be wrong the term goes back much farther and before the term Grunt was used to describe the infantry (I like 'crunchies' because that is the sound they make when tanks drive over them.).

Anyhow. Think of this, we would rather go out without air support than spend another minute in the land of the CSM and uniform violations. The 'Grooming Standard' was considered more of a threat than enemy action.

People can whine that they don't get the recognition that the infantry or the combat arms guys do. They can complain that we are out of uniform and not wearing the correct number of reflective belts. But seriously that arrogance is sometimes what keeps them coming back for more when you roll the day after taking an IED or haven't had a shower this week.

That pride, that cocky arrogant pride can keep you going when all else fails because the other option is to become a Fobbit.

If you are one of those non-combat arms types that spends lots of time out in sector, then when called an insulting term you turn around and say, 'Yeah, because it's not like i was getting shot at hauling your ass and your play station out to the COP. You signed up for that shit I got volentold.'

For the record I am now such a Fobbit that i doubt i would even know where the wire starts. Such things happen as you age. Now I have to say things that all add up to "I used to be cool! Honest!"
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Christopher Parrish
0
0
0
Just had a thought pop in my head, usually a recipe for trouble, but this time I think it is a valid question.

If we do away with the term "POG", then what are we gonna call the snacks we stuff in our rucks?
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Soft Skill bait or Combat Service Support Candy.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PV2 Abbott Shaull
0
0
0
I will start out with personal experience from the Airborne unit I was assigned to. We 2 supply guys, in our units. The Sergeant and Specialist, both were there for awhile when I got there, and the Specialist was bucking for a promotion, but he did nothing more than he had to, and if you put in request for anything, even if all forms were fill out correctly they would be misplaced, and items never seen. Now the Sergeant on the other had for Supply guy was very squared away, he was always on top of things, if he seen any of the request that were turned in while he was away, which was often, he would make sure it was turned and gotten. He would make sure stuff we needed was doled out and not kept in the cage in the basement collecting dust. He looked after the Company the best he could, but he was always being dragged to other companies in the Battalion and Brigade to help keep their stuff straight. Even when the our Sergeant and the Specialist was able to go out on details, he was never able to be found, which infuriated Top. Which was one of many other reasons he never went before the E-5 board, besides the well known drug problem he and other had, but they could never get them piss hot.

Or the thing, that it seems that front line units always seem to get the gear they need right after it greatest need. Largely due to the fact, that someone in the rear seen something 'shiny' and had to hold onto it for little while longer. Or the fact that there is many times when say Intel guys know more facts, but don't tell the guys doing the operation all the minute details that they need to know, because they don't think they are important or they are 'Top Secret' and the troops aren't authorize to know. Well if it can get them killed or injured on the mission it kinda important don't you think.

It deep seated mistrust that has taken generations in the military to build. On today modern Battlefield it has no place since there is no clear cut Front-line like there was in during WWI or WWII. Even in the 1991, I have accounts where gear that was suppose to make to front-line units was still sitting in the rear, in some case it had been there long enough to make it to the front line units who needed it. It has been one of the Army's failing of not following the Marines in expecting all the troops of being able to perform as Riflemen in pinch. It another failing of the those in leadership in combat arms and support arms not working together to cut this shit out. We can sit here and wonder why every Service has their own Field Uniform, but the mentality even goes inside the each Service to some points. It's just silly to continue them all the time. This one them, I have always believed that not one MOS is better than other, we all need each other get the mission done. The gear and information needs to get to people who need it to get that mission done. Quit with the BS rules or believes and start acting like you are all in the same Army, and trained to the same standards, and work for the same President, and working toward the same Objective how every cloudy that may seem at times.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Navigation Division/Dpeartment L Eading Chief Petty Officer
0
0
0
This follows the same thought process as some of our submarine terms of "endearment": NUB, SKIP, DIPSHIT, and various others that would get me in a ton of trouble here, but we still use them. Everyone who come to a submarine is a NUB (non-useful body), because frankly, people don't even know how to keep the forward end of the boat in the proper direction, much less know how to save a life during a casualty. We all, well most of us, understand this and embrace it, yet the senior sailors get into massive amounts of trouble if any of those terms are heard. Now, I am not condoning true hazing, belittling, bullying, etc... because there is a line that we should know not to cross, but you have to have that ability to crack and take a joke. Stress is something that shows people onboard the boats that you can handle anything that is thrown at you if the times comes, and leads to the crew trusting you with their lives.

I know these days we have a "New Military", but I see things getting worse especially when it comes down to the nitty gritty and be it soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen, are forced to make that decision that could save or cost a life. It make me truly think when underway if we were in a situation similar to that of the USS San Francisco would we make it back with some of the sailors we have today....
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
0
0
0
When I first saw this headline on Facebook I thought it was a duffleblog article... then I realized that it was from Marine Corps Times and I shook my head and started to get a little mad. People in the military these days, and the world in general, are so thin skinned and sensitive. In another generation or two the western world, America in particular, is going to be a bunch of marshmallows.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Everyone get butt hurt way too easily. I stand by that not everyone is as important as everyone else. How does someone say a cook is as important as an SF soldier. It just doesn't sound right.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Artiesa Woods
0
0
0
The bottom line is this: the job doesn't get done unless we all work together. Combat arms needs support in order to get their jobs done expeditiously. I went to a BBQ with an Infantry friend and was the only POG there, of course the POG bashing was laid on pretty thick, but it came to a point where one of the grunts started talking about how he was being charged for a vest that was cut off down range after he was shot. Being the good supply guy that I was, I let him know that this POG knew that he was being done dirty and that it only took a simple memorandum signed by the Commander to relieve him of responsibility. I know the rivalry is all in fun which is why I went ahead and sent him a copy of the memorandum template. I just find it funny when Infantry talks so much crap about us POGs but when it comes down to it, they will ultimately need us for something.
(0)
Comment
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
PV2 Abbott Shaull
>1 y
No Sgt Woods, we need POGs for everything. If it wasn't for all the rest of for their support and know how, we would be in boat loads of trouble most of the time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Surgical Physician Assistant
0
0
0
Does anyone ever wonder if the Spartans (the battle of Thermopylae type) had these conversations.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
They did. As you can see here.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Crew Chief
0
0
0
I believe the Air Force is running into some of these issues with using the term "nonners". While I don't really care about termslike that I know some people who get extremely buttt hurt over it. I know some people who don't care if they're call nonners either. In today's "gentler af"(and I disagree it's them pampering everyone like they do know) I think it's more just professional courtesy to just avoid it if it will cause issues on the job. Personally if it's something that doesn't affect the job Getting accomplished I see nothing wrong with it
(0)
Comment
(0)
SrA Crew Chief
SrA (Join to see)
>1 y
^ pretty much.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SrA Crew Chief
SrA (Join to see)
>1 y
Excuse the spelling errors in original post. Shouldn't try and type without being able to see the keys clearly
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Kevin Hopkins
SSgt Kevin Hopkins
>1 y
lol i type like that often. its just a product of working on a computer at late hours
(0)
Reply
(0)
SrA Crew Chief
SrA (Join to see)
>1 y
I just didn't have glasses on. About blind as a bat without them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Edward Thomas
0
0
0
In my experience, a POG is a Person Other than Grunt. I know what I was able to participate in during my time in service and wouldn't change a thing. Wear it as a badge of honor. There will always be more Combat Support and Combat Service Support as opposed to the Combat Arms.

Signed A. Proud POG
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Howitzer Section Chief
0
0
0
My thing is this. I am a POG. Unless you are an 03, you're a POG. Personnel Other than Grunt. There are no ifs ands or buts...Lets take a look at the term GRUNT though...General Replacement UNTrained. This term came around in a time where infantry personnel were being sent overseas before training in order to keep up the troop levels and they then learned on the fly but then they weren't untrained so therefore, technically no longer a Grunt...

However, that's irrelevant in todays world. There will always be POG vs. Grunt. I'm in a Combat Arms MOS as an MP. I've never done a day of PMO work in my life. It's all been field side work with convoy security in Afghanistan. I've been trained in a variety of 03 tactics as well with patrolling, machine gunnery, ambush techniques, MOUT...but I'm still not a Grunt. I'm a field MP...

Do I call Marines POGs while being a POG? Yes. To me the term POG is someone who is soft as mentioned earlier. Someone who complains about no hot chow, or showers, or their phones dying in the field...We didn't have phones or hot chow when we were outside the wire for 2 weeks at a time on a convoy. We slept in our trucks or on cots or on the ground...Our showers were baby wipes and our "hot chow" was getting the chance to use the MRE heater. I also call deployment dodgers. Ones who had multiple opportunities to deploy but always found an excuse to get out of it but then when we got back they said how they wanted to go but they wouldn't them..
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
The Army used to two different types. I don't believe we have different types anymore. It is happens to be a duty assignment for most. Even when I deployed last our MP platoon never did anything close to what would considered combat arms. We have an AF security forces (mp) with us the whole time. They are a whole different beast.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Human Intelligence Collector
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
You forgot to mention Aviation as being Combat Arms.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Howitzer Section Chief
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT (Join to see) it's technically a duty assignment for us too. However, not a lot of Marines bounce back and forth. Most field MPs that I know haven't done PMO work.

I don't know much about the AF security forces though
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) It seems to be the same among all branches.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Squad Leader
0
0
0
I deployed recently with "Infantry men" if that's what you want to call them and they were soo sorry all they did was complain... They slept all day and night while us "pogs" pulled security and did every mission and detail.. I can't stand the infantry
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Fair enough. Keep in mind that even in the infantry we call another POGs. Just because you are infantry doesn't mean you are a bad ass. Add you elude to I have seen some sorry ass infantrymen out there. I'll call them out for it. It is something that must be earned everyday. I hope you weren't referring to all infantry were you said you can't stand them. :) (just so you know I'm infantry)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Dave Joslin
SFC Dave Joslin
>1 y
SGT Mcclendon - I can understand how the experience may have tainted your view, but in the end the basic premiss of the Army is the Infantry - the Army exists because of them - like it or not, without them nobody else would have jobs.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Squad Leader
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
And without us they wouldn't be able to do their job proficiently.. Therefore everyone should respect everyone's MOS.. SFC Joslin
(0)
Reply
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
PV2 Abbott Shaull
>1 y
SGt Diamond Mcclendon sounds like a unit Command element that drank to much of the Cool-aid when they moving up in the ranks. That should of never of happen, and yes everyone should respect all MOS.

MSG Greg Kelly sadly that what happens when some Guard units still believe they are the old-boys network and militia they came from where they voted their leadership into position. Why I am not a real fan of calling up and sending these Guard units over seas. Not all are Bad, but not are Stellar either, when they go through their training, if the Officers and NCOs aren't up to the duties before they go down range or once they do issue arise, then have system to replace them. From my point of view, a good share of them should be replace before they ship anyways, for same reasons why they are rotated in out of units in the Regular in Army. So you don't get situation like this happening when they get overseas and to keep the troops on their toes.

Which has been point out, I do understand the call of POGs and Legs. Used to do it myself in my unit, we did to it each other, lot of the time it all tongue in check stuff. Sometimes people take way to seriously, like I said in the end of the day we are/were serving the same Army, serving the same President, working on the same mission.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Al Parker
0
0
0
Then the CSM was no better than the Soldiers he did not correct or run it up the chain? A prime example of "Poor" leadership.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
You can't correct everything. I don't think it was the duty of our CSM to correct everyone of their soldiers. I don't blame him. It would be unrealistic.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Al Parker
Capt Al Parker
>1 y
So I guess the CSM and you are in a different Army than the other soldiers! You all wear the same uniform and fall under the same regulations, so the CSM was wrong.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Al Parker
Capt Al Parker
>1 y
You are so right, at times reading some of the military articles I get the feeling that self discipline or any discipline is nolonger being stressed in the military at the enlisted and officer level. Not like it was back when I was in uniform. I think today's military wants to act more like civilians than military. Have a Great Day MSgt.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Education And Training Manager   Afsc 3 F2 X1
0
0
0
Please excuse my ignorance, but what in the world does POG mean?
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
It means a "Person Other than Grunt." Basically everyone in the military that is not Infantry. It is commonly used in the Army and Marines. Due to the lack of infantry in the Air Force in Navy they really don't understand it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
LOL. Are you calling me a POG? SSG Justin McCoy
(1)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Education And Training Manager   Afsc 3 F2 X1
TSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
Well, I think you marines and soldiers performing infantry duty both deserve equal respect. I certainly benifit from the bravery you guys demonstrate by doing such things. Hats off to you all.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David S.
0
0
0
I feel any time you differentiate troops such as infantry and cav with either authorized or unauthorized uniform garb your going to get some sort of stratification. This can come about in a number of ways, name calling one of them. If you want to get rid of the "POGs" I feel you're going to need to get rid of the infantry cord, backings, and CIB, however I don't ever see that happening.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CMSgt James Nolan
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
CPT (Join to see)

Here is what I do know: It takes a village. I mean, if you don't have any "POGs" your unit will fail. And you are correct in your observation that many do not work as hard as the "POGs". Nothing will help a unit more than having someone who is administratively squared away that wants the unit to succeed. Treat them like crap and they will find somewhere else to go.

And, in the end, we are all Soldiers, or Sailors or Marines or Airmen, or Coast Guard or as we are all, to someone "troops".
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Mi Branch Sgm
0
0
0
I don't know about the Marine Corps, but, as for the Army--no, no Soldier should called POG--just like Infantrymen shouldn't be called knuckle-draggers or any other term insulting their intelligence. Moreover, this type of name calling can be construed as bullying or hazing which is now added to the new AR 600-20 as a standard of misconduct. I got it--most of it is harmless joking, until it's not and someone either files a complaint or worse--someone is driven to hurting themselves because of constant ridicule. So, the easy answer is to just stop it all and everyone wins...
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
On the same token how often are we called "Grunts." I have even seen it even on here. I could say that I am not some dumb cave man that simply just runs into a gun fight grunting as a form of communication but it is not viewed like that. Just like we don't view the term POG. How often have you heard soldiers say "that is grunt stuff" or some other jab at the infantry. Would they be it by AR 600-20 also?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Computer Operator 5
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Who decides? Maybe I am more easily offended then others. Is that also covered under the new AR 600-20? Because if it is....
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM Mi Branch Sgm
CSM (Join to see)
>1 y
Just like every other basis of any filed compliant, is from the perspective and perception of the acusser. No, 600-20 doesn't specifically address the word "POG" or "Grunt", however, it doesn't need to to categorize those words as a form of bullying or hazing if the acusser feels bullied or hazed by being called either one. It's not rocket science. We all know it's not about what was intended, it's about how it was received. Yes, there was a time when all these pet names and ragging on each other was acceptable culture in the Army---it still wasn't right---it was just acceptable. Now it isn't acceptable anymore in light of us promoting us as a professional Army. We just need to accept that the Army is progressing and progress with it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Instructor/Writer
0
0
0
What bothers me the most on this post is the that the CSM....the biggest horse in the barn walking around with 'blinders' on. This is precisley why standards flew the coop. Set the standard, be the standard and ENFORCE the standard. By the way.....being called a POG is the same as being called a jarhead, squid, grunt, gun bunny, leg, FNG...etc....
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Instructor/Writer
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
This is true. However, all the seniors should have put the heads together and found a way tobrectify the situation
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Chris Smith They were working outside just like we were. I ended up putting on my silk weight top. They were wearing a mix of issued and unissued gear. It was all a mess. If they were all the same they would have not been so bad but it is all over the place. from ploypro to fleece to snow suits. head gear was a mix from black fleece to green fleece to PC to some random are colorish knit caps.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Chris Smith You are right about they all don't have to have the same uniform but they looked like ass. My soldiers were just wearing ACUs with a silk weight top. It wasn't really that cold. The black fleece is not an authorized item for the ACU. Our CSM sets the policy on what we can and can not wear. My 1SG enforces it. It is the point of looking uniformed and uniform. If every soldier in a squad is wearing a different piece of snivel gear are they really uniformed?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Human Intelligence Collector
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Is snivel gear a doctrinal term? ;)
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

How are you connected to the military?
  • Active Duty
  • Active Reserve / National Guard
  • Pre-Commission
  • Veteran / Retired
  • Civilian Supporter