570
562
8
I have been dealing with this a lot. I have seen both ways. As per AR 600–25 the junior person should salute. I see a 1LT senior to a 2LT and I salute them. I have seen many instances where this does not happen. Most see a LT as a LT regardless of being a 1st or 2nd. How do you all feel about this?
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
Edited 11 y ago
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 1296
Yes. It's all about rendering courtesy and respect to those senior to you.
(1)
(0)
This was an epic discussion topic within the Warrant Officer Corps a few years ago, the bottom line was this, a W1 will salute a CW2, CW3, C4, and a CW5.
A 2LT has always seems to have lot to prove in a short amount of time to many. In my experience thus far, Ive yet to see a rank get more abuse than a 2LT. The last thing I would want, is to paint an additional target on myself for not rendering the proper military customs and courtesy's. When in doubt its easier to apologize for saluting someone, than to apologize for not saluting someone.
A 2LT has always seems to have lot to prove in a short amount of time to many. In my experience thus far, Ive yet to see a rank get more abuse than a 2LT. The last thing I would want, is to paint an additional target on myself for not rendering the proper military customs and courtesy's. When in doubt its easier to apologize for saluting someone, than to apologize for not saluting someone.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
This is very much the case. I wouldn't not expect a 2LT to salute me when I get it but I will not tell him not too. I have been told many times by the same people over, over, and over again to not salute them. But I do it anyway. I am supposed. Even if they came a few months before me I still respect them.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
If you are an officer, and you outrank someone, and they salute you, and you chastise them for it, that violates the first rule of military brotherhood: "Don't be a dick".
(2)
(0)
Proper customs and courtesies must be followed. Period. A 2LT should salute a 1LT. A SGT should stand at parade rest when speaking with a SSG. These actions/traditions are time honored and have more meaning than just respecting a superior. They will instill discipline in the force as a whole if properly executed and enforced.
(1)
(0)
SFC James Verdejo
I'm with you on this one 1SG. Reading some of these threads, I'm scratching my head. Back in 81 when I came in, this was NOT an issue, you just did it. Now we are talking about certain situations?? I don't recal any Reg's talking about certain situations. They clearly specify Who, What, Where, When, and Why to do it. If the Individual your rendering a salute to dosen't like it, THEY need to get out. It is STILL you responsibility to render that salute.
(0)
(0)
I do believe that in saying an LT is an LT is completely misguided because their pay grades say 0-1 and 0-2 which is not the same but in that comment that was made they are basically saying that a specialist shouldnt satand at parade rest for a corporal (both are E-4) or that a Master Seargent shouldnt stand at parade rest for First Seargent(both are E-8) or even a Seargent Major shouldnt stand at parade rest for a Command Seargent Major(both are E-9). Im just saying what message are pushing out to soldiers who are looking at 2LTs not saluting 1LTs but then the statement that the Army isnt like it used to be keeps coming up and we wonder why...
(1)
(0)
Hell, yes, that 1LT earned his rank. We tended not to mention it if it didn't happen in casual situations so long as it was done when appropriate like when the brass was around.
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
Silly isn't it LT, its simply proper military etiquette. One of my former ROTC instructors, a captain at the time, always used to joke when we went to the Newport Navy base, "Hey, here comes a Navy captain, do I have to salute?"
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I still greet my XO as Sir. I am a month out from getting my silver bar but he is still senior to me by rank and position.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
Good for you LT, congrats!! You're right on because you're showing respect to the rank & authority. As a nube, I think I saluted everything that moved. Do your soldiers get in line when they know you're coming and make it so you havee to salute each one of them as they walk 10 paces apart? My first week in Korea, my Commo section got 1/2 the HQ Co together then called me down to the motor pool so I had to salute 56 soldiers as they each left the motor pool gate - gotta love it. If they don't bust your beans, they don't like you.
Ooo, but the rank among LTs thing - is that old saying still out there, "Rank among LTs is like virginity among Ladies of the evening"? Just kidding of course, At least that's what it was in my day.
Ooo, but the rank among LTs thing - is that old saying still out there, "Rank among LTs is like virginity among Ladies of the evening"? Just kidding of course, At least that's what it was in my day.
(0)
(0)
The exact verbiage of the regulation was in the OP so we’ll skip ahead to where AR 600-25 addresses Commander’s Discretion where it states, in Paragraph 1-3.(g.) that "Local commanders will carefully review saluting policies for their installations. Where considered desirable in their judgment, they will develop and publish modified saluting policies for congested, student, or high density living areas where saluting would be highly repetitious or otherwise infeasible."
I'm not sure where the confusion arises. Not only is it spelled out in black and white, but I find it difficult for me to believe that a Commander could possibly interpret the words “congested, student, or high density living areas where saluting would be repetitious or otherwise infeasible” to mean that junior officers in the grade of 2nd/1st Lieutenant need not salute each other. It’s not like they’re crawling around everywhere where it would be “highly repetitious or otherwise infeasible.”
Now onto the subject of "tradition." (defined as “a long-established custom or belief that has been passed on.”) This can be rooted in history and be heavily documented or can start simply as an accepted practice. As in "If you fail to correct a deficiency you just established the new standard."
I obviously can't speak from an officer’s POV, but after nearly 20 years Active Duty and my most recent experience working as the Operations NCO in a BDE S3 shop that has been officer heavy for the past 3 years, I see that the officer and enlisted worlds can be, at times, quite different. With that being said, it appears now that it is "tradition" for officers to not salute their peers and subordinates, to address those same peers and subordinates by their first names, and stand around with their hands in their pockets...things that really grind my gears but when corrected by an NCO, they get scowls, dirty looks, and get talked down to like we’re imbeciles or being disrespectful when they make these on the spot corrections like we were charged to do when inducted into the NCO Corps.
"I will discharge carefully and diligently the duties of the grade to which I have been promoted and uphold the traditions and standards of the Army. I understand that soldiers of lesser rank are required to obey my lawful orders. Accordingly, I accept responsibility for their actions. As a noncommissioned officer, I accept the charge to observe and follow the orders and directions given by supervisors acting according to the laws, articles and rules governing the discipline of the Army, I will correct conditions detrimental to the readiness thereof. In so doing, I will fulfill my greatest obligation as a leader and thereby confirm my status as a noncommissioned officer."
I guess in the name of “tradition” we will continue to confuse our new and junior Soldiers by presenting two standards with the same excuse I was always given...”that’s just the way it is.”
I'm not sure where the confusion arises. Not only is it spelled out in black and white, but I find it difficult for me to believe that a Commander could possibly interpret the words “congested, student, or high density living areas where saluting would be repetitious or otherwise infeasible” to mean that junior officers in the grade of 2nd/1st Lieutenant need not salute each other. It’s not like they’re crawling around everywhere where it would be “highly repetitious or otherwise infeasible.”
Now onto the subject of "tradition." (defined as “a long-established custom or belief that has been passed on.”) This can be rooted in history and be heavily documented or can start simply as an accepted practice. As in "If you fail to correct a deficiency you just established the new standard."
I obviously can't speak from an officer’s POV, but after nearly 20 years Active Duty and my most recent experience working as the Operations NCO in a BDE S3 shop that has been officer heavy for the past 3 years, I see that the officer and enlisted worlds can be, at times, quite different. With that being said, it appears now that it is "tradition" for officers to not salute their peers and subordinates, to address those same peers and subordinates by their first names, and stand around with their hands in their pockets...things that really grind my gears but when corrected by an NCO, they get scowls, dirty looks, and get talked down to like we’re imbeciles or being disrespectful when they make these on the spot corrections like we were charged to do when inducted into the NCO Corps.
"I will discharge carefully and diligently the duties of the grade to which I have been promoted and uphold the traditions and standards of the Army. I understand that soldiers of lesser rank are required to obey my lawful orders. Accordingly, I accept responsibility for their actions. As a noncommissioned officer, I accept the charge to observe and follow the orders and directions given by supervisors acting according to the laws, articles and rules governing the discipline of the Army, I will correct conditions detrimental to the readiness thereof. In so doing, I will fulfill my greatest obligation as a leader and thereby confirm my status as a noncommissioned officer."
I guess in the name of “tradition” we will continue to confuse our new and junior Soldiers by presenting two standards with the same excuse I was always given...”that’s just the way it is.”
(1)
(0)
SSG Kevin McCulley
1LT, if I may.. I think we enlisted look through the lens of 'if it is good for the goose, it is good for the gander' so to speak. Better spoken: We are all one Army Culture. I've learned through this forum that isn't the case. I think officers hold themselves further apart from enlisted than enlisted hold officers. We (I) always thought custom and rules applied equally. The manner in which the custom manifested itself is different solely depending on rank caste. Through this lens, it would never occur to us that you are any different us thusly: We don't address each other by first names so it is odd for you to do so. We render and return the greeting of the day to NCOs senior in grade (enlisted equivalent of a salute) regardless of the particulars, thus we would expect similar behavior of you.
TO be honest, I thought officers of equal rank did not salute each other, just as enlisted. SSGs do not stand at parade for SSGs, nor render the greeting of the day. Affixing sergeant somewhere in a sentence isn't required. In fact, calling them completely by their last name without grade honorific is fully acceptable. Hell, two NCOs of equal grade using first names is something I could ignore. Never address a senior without their due honorific. If you leave it off when addressing a Junior, you are being disrespectful though not rude. Addressing a soldier by their full "Sergeant McCulley" doesn't just cease being disrespectful, but also becomes actually respectful. I know it because I remember how it made me smile inside to hear it as a whee pup. WElp.. the ambien kicked in about 3/4ths through that.. I'll check back to see ifI embarassed myself in thr morning.
TO be honest, I thought officers of equal rank did not salute each other, just as enlisted. SSGs do not stand at parade for SSGs, nor render the greeting of the day. Affixing sergeant somewhere in a sentence isn't required. In fact, calling them completely by their last name without grade honorific is fully acceptable. Hell, two NCOs of equal grade using first names is something I could ignore. Never address a senior without their due honorific. If you leave it off when addressing a Junior, you are being disrespectful though not rude. Addressing a soldier by their full "Sergeant McCulley" doesn't just cease being disrespectful, but also becomes actually respectful. I know it because I remember how it made me smile inside to hear it as a whee pup. WElp.. the ambien kicked in about 3/4ths through that.. I'll check back to see ifI embarassed myself in thr morning.
(3)
(0)
SSG Daniel Deiler
It's not that I see addressing peers and subordinates by first name as an insult, but rather I do not think it is professional to do so in the workplace. It's how I was brought up in the Army...and partly done so in order to separate work from "play." Using ones first name I see as something I reserve for those I see as my friends. Even the peers I hang out with outside of work I still use rank and/or last name with rank when talking to them in the office unless we are the only ones in the office. Even then I feel at odds with myself when addressing a SFC by first name. It just doesn’t feel right even though we all consider ourselves to be peers regardless of what rank we wear. When I am outside of work, I try to relax and use first names but still often find myself using their last name. I would never even FATHOM calling a subordinate by their first name. Maybe it's something I learned and brought forward through playing sports as I always used last names there as well. And maybe I’m all alone on my island :)
(0)
(0)
SSG Kevin McCulley
Heh.. ambien.. I don't even remember posting that. I agree with my ambien intoxicated self though.
(0)
(0)
Does a 1sg stand at parade rest for a sgm/csm? My point exactly if you don't want to salute don't join the army because unless youre a civilian your gonna salute somebody either higher or lesser in real than you point blank period
(2)
(1)
LT, I don't understand your question. Is the confusion because you both have a single bar, although one is gold and the other is silver? If that's the case, then does a major need to salute a lieutenant colonel? They are both oak leaf clusters... or is the question one of proximity; you don't have to salute the guy with the next closest rank to your own... Yeah, I'm being sarcastic. Hell yes Lieutenant, and as much as it might have pained me to do it on occasion, I always saluted the lieutenants I came across, knowing full well, as someone else mentioned that if based on experience, they should be saluting me. I rendered a proper salute to the lieutenant (1st or 2nd), not because he necessarily deserved it, but because I was trained properly to show respect to those in a position and of a rank higher than mine. You as a 2LT should be showing respect to the 1LT and correcting those individuals (2LT or lower) who are failing to render a salute. My point, LT is that this question shouldn't have even needed to be asked. Now that I have given you an on-the-spot correction, I salute you, Sir!
(1)
(0)
SFC Ned Brownell
Well sir, with respect, I don't buy it. I will say, I was enlisted/NCO my entire career and didn't pay much attention to what LT's did amongst themselves, but what you are saying is illogical, If for no other reason than to show mutual respect and ensure that juniors under them would remember to also render salutes to both 1st and 2nd Lt's, when the NCO's were not around to remind them. They are two distinct and separate ranks, otherwise as has been mentioned in other posts, why have two separate ranks? Just because they don't salute each other doesn't mean they shouldn't be doing it. Just my two cents worth...
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
SFC Browell. This is something that is best understood by officers. In the enlisted case you would ask if a PSG should stand at parade rest for a 1SG. It never happens. But I bet if that PSG was in trouble he would be standing at parade rest then. Why would it matter then. In the same token the team leader should respect the squad leader. I am just old school but I still believe we much maintain what customs we have left.
(0)
(1)
SSgt Kevin Dunlap
It appears that the "good" reason is that according to the MTOE, 2LTs don't actually exist
(0)
(0)
1LT(P) (Join to see)
Sir, like I've seen other officers comment and like I mentioned myself in my own answer, it seems that everyone who hasn't been a lieutenant thinks that there is no discussion, while the rest of us know better.
SFC Brownell, there is no other dynamic between two ranks in the military like the one between 2LT and 1LT (or Ensign/LTJG). You can't use LTC/COL or any other ranks as an example to support your position.
SFC Brownell, there is no other dynamic between two ranks in the military like the one between 2LT and 1LT (or Ensign/LTJG). You can't use LTC/COL or any other ranks as an example to support your position.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


Officers
Customs and Courtesies
Army
Saluting
AR 600-25
