570
562
8
I have been dealing with this a lot. I have seen both ways. As per AR 600–25 the junior person should salute. I see a 1LT senior to a 2LT and I salute them. I have seen many instances where this does not happen. Most see a LT as a LT regardless of being a 1st or 2nd. How do you all feel about this?
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
Edited 11 y ago
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 1296
<p>A 2LT should salute a 1LT ALWAYS. Should a SPC go to Parade Rest for a newly promoted E5 who just a day ago was his peer? Yes, they should, because that person has earned it.</p><p><br></p><p>I was a 1LT attending CPT's career course, all of my peers in that class were Captain's. During class, we would be engaged in the same exact work and duties. Walking to class every morning I would see them walking to class and I would salute! </p><p><br></p><p>When I was in that same class I would see the BOLC class going into the same building. At the time I thought it was the accepted practice that LT's did not salute each other. As I am saluting every CPT that walks by myself, I salute. I received the same courtesy from the 2LT from about 25% of them. It wasn't until I passed a 2LT (he did not salute), that a CPT behind me corrected him. That CPT didn't stop there he also corrected me. Ever since then, I uphold the written standard over the normal practice because it is the right thing to do.</p><p><br></p><p>We live and learn every day, as a 2LT you are not expected to know all the answers but now that you do know, what will you do with it?</p><p><br></p>
(3)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Sir, thank you for having the integrity to do the right thing. If only we can get them to keep their hands out of their pockets :+)
(2)
(0)
If as an officer you are junior in rank to a fellow officer than you must extend the proper courtesy of saluting.
(3)
(0)
The salute is a time honored recognition, that has been devalued. Because a lot of Officers and Enlisted soldiers have issues with saluting and would walk across the street to avoid rendering a salute. Also because we have been entrenched in combat zones for the past 12 years soldiers have gotten out of the practice of saluting their superiors and superiors their subordinates. Now that the focus is being placed on Garrison soldiering and leading we have to bring back the courtesies and customs that belong in a garrison environment and is integral in maintaining basic discipline among young soldiers.
(3)
(0)
Suspended Profile
No. Lieutenants are lieutenants regardless of whether 1st or 2nd. While some may render the salute it's not mandatory.
SGT Irving Salsbury
I believe that a salute to a higher grade is required. Execution is a separate thing but protocol is protocol. I spent almost 11 years active and saw the basics go down the toilet. Soldiers and officers need to know their place amongst each other and respect is "automatic" based on position (rank) not like or dislike of character (although one should fit their respected positions). I had one account when the rank did not fit the character, however I still respected the lonely Captain since no one else seemed to.<br>
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
That is a very good point from the CSM. You and your boss are both CSMs but it is about the respect of the office or position of that person. I am about to pick up 1LT in two months and I may a few months ahead of my peers that are a 2LT but on the same token you may be only a year behind your boss that is also a CSM.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
exactly right CSM. I'm not sure what army these officers are in. but it isn't the army I've spent 24 years in
(0)
(0)
I don't even see a question. The regs are clear...so is the 2Lt's duty. Nuff said.
(3)
(0)
The way I was "raised" was "there is no rank among lieutenants," therefore the general rule is no.
A reason presented to me when I was a 2LT was that if you examine the MTOE, you will not find a position for a 2LT; they are all for 1LTs (my MSG was attempting to explain to me how 2LTs just don't exist or are mythical). Being of a higher rank typically implies being prepared for or assuming more responsibility (which is why my PSG with 20+ years saluted me as a 2LT with 18 months; I was responsible for him). Therefore, all LTs in an MTOE unit are filling a 1LT position on the MTOE, and are therefore due the same respect, to include from each other. However, COLs and LTCs and different GOs have delineated levels of responsibility, which is why the rules don't blur there.
Exception: if the 1LT is in a position of authority (i.e. Company Commander) then I would expect the junior LTs (1st and 2nd) to show the respect due the position, to include calling "Sir/Ma'am," especially in public. Similar to the courtesy afforded by other COLs to the Chief of Staff that I've seen in good units.
A reason presented to me when I was a 2LT was that if you examine the MTOE, you will not find a position for a 2LT; they are all for 1LTs (my MSG was attempting to explain to me how 2LTs just don't exist or are mythical). Being of a higher rank typically implies being prepared for or assuming more responsibility (which is why my PSG with 20+ years saluted me as a 2LT with 18 months; I was responsible for him). Therefore, all LTs in an MTOE unit are filling a 1LT position on the MTOE, and are therefore due the same respect, to include from each other. However, COLs and LTCs and different GOs have delineated levels of responsibility, which is why the rules don't blur there.
Exception: if the 1LT is in a position of authority (i.e. Company Commander) then I would expect the junior LTs (1st and 2nd) to show the respect due the position, to include calling "Sir/Ma'am," especially in public. Similar to the courtesy afforded by other COLs to the Chief of Staff that I've seen in good units.
(3)
(0)
CPT Bill McNeely
Interesting you bring this up Sir. In 2003-2004 Our Company Commander had been relieved. All the Lts ( including me) had just been promoted to 1LT. The BN Assistant S-4 ,a prior service 1LT, ( Just Cause Vet, Black Hat with 16 years of service) was selected to relieve him. In public it was always LT Livingston or we always refered to him as the commander. It was an adjustment at first because we were all friendly with him but we made it work and it trickled down to the rest of the company.
(1)
(0)
Well, the military salute is
a gesture of respect for the rank and if the person carrying it is inspirational
it is even more appropriate. Having said this, please allow me to remind you of
this classic quote by MAJ Richard
Winters as CPT Sobel bypasses him without rendering the proper salute, as read
or seen in Band of Brothers; “We salute the rank, not the man.”
(3)
(0)
No, that is ridiculous. LTs who are full of themselves are headed for trouble. LTs should support each other and help each other grown. When you are an LT, you should be in the learning mode. You should be proud of being an officer but you need to understand that there are tens of thousands of LTs in the Army. I agree with LTC Shebert's comments but I spent my 2LT days in South Korea and LTs did not salute each other.
(3)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Sir, I was an NCO before commissioning. I agree with LTC Sherbert's comments as well. I spent my first tour as an enlisted Soldier in Korea in a field artillery unit. The salute wasn't about being full of one's self. It was about respecting the rank that had been awarded to that officer and consistency of the chain of command and officer support systems.
I'm sure you know, the reason why the 2LT and MAJ ranks are Gold colored is to help distinguish the "apprentice" in that grade of officer from those who are experienced at that grade of officer (Company or Field Grade).
For a 2LT to not salute a 1LT is, in my mind's eye, the equivalent of a CPT not saluting a MAJ, or a COL not saluting a BG. It just doesn't happen, and it shouldn't happen.
The intent - again, in my mind's eye and from my 25+ years in the military - is to render and recognize the rank that service member has received, and not necessarily the person. It's recognition of the rank.
(4)
(0)
I required my subordinates to render proper honors for respect of the effort to hold that rank. As should a 2nd LT salute the 1st LT, in most cases he has earned it in one way or another. the respect is for the professional and should not be questioned. It is and always should be rendered to your senior.
(3)
(0)
During my time in a rifle company we always abided by the "one-bar rule," meaning that 2ndLts and 1stLts were considered peers and didn't salute each other or call each other sir. The only exception was the relationship between platoon commanders and company XOs or COs who happened to be 1stLts--platoon commanders referred to XOs as "XO" or "Lieutenant Smith" even if they were the same rank. That was done mainly so everyone else in the company understood the relationship between a platoon commander and XO, seeing how in many cases we were peers who came through TBS/IOC together and were friends off duty. I can remember my instructors at IOC explaining those informal rules to us, so I don't think they were unique to my battalion.
We only had a few CWOs in our battalion--the NBC officer and the Gunner are the only ones who come to mind right now--and they were basically treated as on par with Lts so they acted accordingly in their dealings with captains and majors. But since Gunners have 15+ years of experience and work on the BnCO's primary staff on par with the S-3 or S-4, they get a certain amount of deference from Lts.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next


Officers
Customs and Courtesies
Army
Saluting
AR 600-25
