Posted on May 28, 2014
PO1 Master-at-Arms
1.36M
6.44K
3.13K
298
286
12
Should army and marines consolidate
Think objectively. Traditions, camaraderie aside. Both are somewhat similarly more combat-oriented than USN or USAF. Answer practically without putting down either one of them.

PS: Yes, some are taunting about USN and USAF consolidation or Air Force return to Army Air Corps. My take on that if it's practical, lessen bureaucracy, and make for a smoother communications pipeline amongst the DoD components, why not? Again, camaraderie and traditions aside for a min.
Posted in these groups: Cf1cbe80 TroopsAmerican flag soldiers SoldiersDod color DoD
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 1533
GySgt Ronald Bacote
2
2
0
We are all one team .
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Robert Wheeler
SFC Robert Wheeler
>1 y
Cpl Toby Dodd - What bullshit! If you are done bashing the Army, maybe you need to remember that the Army is the Senior service. Maybe you also need to remember that we fight, bleed, and die like anybody else. Your superior Marine attitude is so much crap.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Toby Dodd
Cpl Toby Dodd
>1 y
SFC Robert Wheeler Says the Liberal Arts degree holder. Thank you, I accept your compliment. Have a nice day in left field.
(0)
Reply
(1)
CPT Retired
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
The Marines do a great job at teaching their troops the history of their branch and a Spirit De Corps that is unequal. They are a fighting force that is recognized the world over and lauded in Hollywood movies and books. The Marines are worthy of respect.
They do have a problem that continues to this day. They are not taught respect for others. Cpl. Toby Dodd is proof of this. they aren't taught the rich history of the other branches and the sacrifices made by them. They look down on the other branches and truly feel like they are superior. I've worked with service members from all of the branches. They all have good and substandard members. For every soldier that, like SSG James McCauley claims, would have joined the Marines "but", there is a prior service Marine who talks about how bad the Marines are at promoting and taking care of their service members.
If you are a Marine and have questions about how much the other branches have contributed to our Country's war efforts, I suggest you look at the KIA list from our wars to get an idea. Also, look up each branche's history and learn to be proud of their accomplishments. If you don't know where to start, look up the Battle of Midway (Navy main effort), the Battle of the Skies over Berlin or Mig Alley in Korea (Air Force), the invasion of Europe (Army) or the March to Bahgdad by the 3rd Infantry Division.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Don "GUNNY" Miller
Cpl Don "GUNNY" Miller
>1 y
SFC Robert Wheeler - I respectfully disagree with you on consolidating, and as far as boss goes at present we have NONE.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Squad Leader
2
2
0
What about just consolidating certain aspects, like medical, police, warrior transition units.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
That's what I'm asking about. SOCOM for instance already combined all special forces. So what components you think will work in solidarity for DoD?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Kenneth Ellis
2
2
0
The question should be this. They all have planes. should we just have one big Air Force.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTJG Eric Govreau
2
2
0
I brought this conversation up with a Former Marine that I know, and his response was this (loosely paraphrased):

The Marine Corp is a truly expeditionary force (nothing was mentioned of the amphibious capability) that the president can order anywhere in the world without being required of informing congress (or have congressional approval) beforehand, where he does not have that luxury with the Army.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Well, I guess if nothing else, the spec ops have consolidated from all branches for whatever it's worth. Thought that Army and Marines could work something out, we'll see
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Anthony Rossi
2
2
0
No, I don't have time for the Marine corp ego. I don't need the fancy uniforms.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Ha-ha, classy response. Gave me a good chuckle, thanks!
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Anthony Rossi
SGT Anthony Rossi
>1 y
Marines aren't the only ones that think there branches is the best. I'd like to see how many marines pick on the Navy when your supporting them with Navel gun fire! Or maybe they can just swim to there next war zone instead of getting a ride from the Navy:)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTJG Eric Govreau
2
2
0
After 240 years, some degree of institutional mind-set is going to occur. Emotionally speaking, the traditions of all the services are different and just cannot be cast aside.

Objectively thinking, and judging by the responses, this has occurred to no one, but here are some points to think about...

First off, we are pretty much all part of the same team, and that is called the Department of Defense. Which, is a misnomer in of itself, as NONE of the services of the DOD can be used in the defense of the United States (posse comitatus act). In fact, up until shortly after WWII, it was called the War Department. Not since the US Civil war has our military conducted military operations on US soil (PCA was written into law in the 1870's). All operations have been aimed at protecting our allies and interests overseas.

Traditionally speaking, the AUS has been considered an invasion and occupation army, while the USMC is specialized in amphibious assault. However, consider the two largest amphibious invasions of the past century. One was conducted by three divisions of Marines (3rd, 4th, and 5th MDs), while the other was conducted by three Army divisions (1st, 4th and 29th IDs). Not taking away from the 101st and the 82nd ABD's, but they didn't come across on boats.

Now, look at Iraqi Freedom...both the Army and the Marines were used, as land infantry, coming up from the south. And made better time than expected, but it seems that someone in the IRG must have read Sun Tzu, as it resulted in a bitter insurgency for the next 5-odd years.

Frankly, this question always seems to come up in times of military recession. But do we really want to be like Red China (yes, I said it), and have all of the 'ancillary' services fall subordinate to the Army?
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Well fortunately we're not embedded with Red China commie values. And should we fall subordinate to the Army as you said it won't be because we're becoming a communist republic. Sun Tzu was a war strategist and not a politician. Sad to see how the insurgency keeps disrupting normal lives in the middle east as to where his strategies seem to languish.

Now my motivation for asking this question is purely from a pragmatic stand point with of course keeping in mind of saving the American Dollar and whatever the value it still has left. Glad we're not even CLOSE to the mentality of Red China
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC(P) Mark Newman
2
2
0
I think these are two VERY different cultures. How would that be addressed? The Army could probably stand becoming more like The Marines but will Marines be forced to be more like the Army? The Corps has more discipline, more widespread traditions practiced among all ranks, a closer lifelong camradery w each other compared to soldiers. Just my opinion, obviously, but I think culturally the Marines would be especially resistant.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SN Greg Wright
2
2
0
Absolutely not. And tradition is entirely my reason. 300 years of it. It's built into their dna, it effects their psyche, their mentality, the way they associate with one another. Their very synergy. It cannot be removed as an issue in order to 'objectively' examine this idea. It just can't.

I feel the same thing about the Navy. 300 years of tradition...I love all of that shit, it made it interesting, fun, educational. It makes you feel like you're part of something larger, not just an organization, but an ENTITY with a life of it's own, stretching back centuries.

So no. Leave them alone. Anyway, they're already rolled into the Navy.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Beside tradition, modes of operation and camaraderie, any other reasons?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Frank Rinchich
Sgt Frank Rinchich
10 y
SN Greg Wright, a little correction, I think you may mean 240 years of tradition 1775 from 2015 is 240 years. Navy army and Marine corps were officially created ( known as the military, was officially crated by congress 1775 but the individual units were 1775. the marines were Nov. 10th 1775. the Navy was a couple weeks before, the army known at the time as the continual army was before the other two , but all three were created by congress as the US military 1775
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Nancy Bodyk (Retired)
2
2
0
I have been telling my co-workers for years that the separate Services should be consolidated into one with a ground, air, and sea component. One, it would save the taxpayers’ a lot of money. Instead of each Service having their own communications equipment that doesn’t always work together well, there would be one communications equipment set and no need to worry about integrating four different communications packages. Instead of the Army and Marines having different armored platforms they have the same tank. The same with helicopters and aircraft. Two, it would streamline the Services since we are downsizing. It would also make them more efficient. Third, we can all wear the same uniform instead of wasting tons of money on different ones. We all used to wear the BDUs.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC Mike Morelli
SPC Mike Morelli
10 y
Keep them separated. However I agree that commo and other such gear, as well as most SoPs. ie. trying to coordinate air support with a grid map...
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Jeremy Smith
SFC Jeremy Smith
10 y
They have an LCAC and a Marine amphibious landing group....not the same mission. They have three team squads and a marine infantry battalion is larger than an Army battalion...plus how they operate is completely different I was in both. Abrams would be landed from the sea not from other land base...A Marines MEU (SOC) is a Battalion plus with many assets readily available
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Raymond Thibault
SFC Raymond Thibault
10 y
No Never ever. Marine Re-condo and Army Rangers have a different Mission.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Kenneth Hunnell
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Michael Halpin
2
2
0
There are many differences between the Marines and the Army. Attitude is just one, training is another. The country is well served by the mystique of the Marines. The country as well as both services would lose something if both are combined into one service. It almost impossible to explain but Soldiers and Marines know it to be true. Politicians and civilians will never understand this.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
I like the way you put it, sir. Very objective, and '...mystique of the Marines' is phrased very neatly!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close