Posted on Mar 12, 2014
SPC 92 Gulf
7.81K
45
54
0
0
0
Posted in these groups: No discrimination sign Discrimination
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
SFC Michael Hasbun
12
12
0
We don't say "fat", that's rude. It's "excess energy stored in potential form, carried externally".
(12)
Comment
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
SSG Hasburn - we don't say "fat". Perhaps "weight challenged" is better?  Naw.  Call it what it is.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Communications Chief (S6)
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
vertically challenged is short people

(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Armament Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
10 y
We had a huge fat interpreter that got several waivers to join. The 1SG and Commander wanted to chapter her for being HUGE, but since she was so short there was no table weight listed, she existed outside of any regulation they could apply to her, since she could not be out of weight tolerance for a standard that did not exist. Was quite a strange situation. The reg stipulates things for people taller then the table, but not shorter.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CW2 Jonathan Kantor
CW2 Jonathan Kantor
10 y
Brilliant!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CMSgt James Nolan
4
4
0
This is just a theory for everyone, but hear it out briefly.  Why worry about the body fat measurements?  Why not just have strict enforcement of the PT standards?  Wait now. If the ultimate goal behind weight loss is fitness anyway, why would fitness not be the major emphasis.  I mean, what do I care if you are heavier than I am, if you blow the Fitness Test out of the water?  We need warriors that can haul someone from a blown apart Hummer, who can hump weapons, ammo and gear.  Additionally, not everyone is designed to be "thin", some of us are just big boned, some tall, some short, some big chested, and narrow waisted, some big waisted and narrow chested.  But...if you are big boned, you have got to be able to run.......I would rather work with a big guy who can gut out a PT test, than someone who can't pick up a ruck.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Michael Blount
2
2
0
If you can show me a more accurate body fat measurement method that's as fast or faster than what we now use, I'd certainly give it a try.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Motor Transport Operator
SGT (Join to see)
10 y
The only accurate way to test body fat is with a caliper..
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
When you have a 500 person bn, calipers or immersion testing take a lonnnnnnng time, and it's usually time you don't have
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Daniel Rosploch
SSG Daniel Rosploch
10 y
I agree with 1SG Blount on this one. It takes long enough to screen a battalion of Soldiers to see if they pass height and weight and even longer to tape the failures. Plus you have to factor in the time it takes to process all of that data into a usable format because the battalion sergeant major wants to see by-name lists from every unit, organized in 8 different ways....but that's getting into a whole other topic of discussion so I'll just stop while I'm ahead.

Basically, we need a better, faster, more accurate method if we're talking about replacing the way its done now. Otherwise there is no point in changing the system if it is going to make things more difficult and take longer than it does now. Always upgrade, never downgrade....
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
SGT(P) - you're spot on.  If somebody can come up with a better mouse-trap on this one, s/he deserves a medal
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Should army find a new way to fat test soldiers???
1SG First Sergeant
2
2
0

In my opinion? Yes the military should use 1 standardized system throught all branches and it should be developed in conjuction with civilian health professionals in order to determine the most accurate method possible. We are talking about people's careers and the effects on thousands of family members....having said that service members should do their best so that weight never becomes an issue to begin with.

Realistically, the services will never agree on one standard and the tape is the fastest, cheapest method.

(2)
Comment
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
SFC - Agreed. As long as everyone agrees that the tape method has its drawbacks, we're good.  Biggest issue I have is the Army's diet has got to be one of the world's worst at helping Soldiers lose the spare tire, baby belly, whatever you want to call it.  Diet is about 70-75% of weight loss; PT being the other 25-30%.  We can argue about the percentages later, but the bottom line is Army food does not help Soldiers who need to make better choices.  I'd bet once that happens, you'll see fewer FatBoys.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Wade Huffman
1
1
0
Am I the only one that remembers the OLD pinch test???   At least the tape is more accurate that that was (and much less subjective).  I'm just glad I never had to worry about it then... of course there may be a slight problem if I were to ever be recalled to active duty! LOL!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Jonathan Kantor
1
1
0
I can't offer an alternative means of testing overweight Troops, but I have been hearing for years how outdated our BFP scale is.  Evidently, there are much more modern means of determining body fat percentages that make a lot more sense.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Sales Manager
SGT (Join to see)
10 y
The ARMY has always been behind the times a bit but to consider a neck and waistline measurement as the end all way to decide if a soldier is in good fitness is about as scientific as dowsing for water.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW2 Jonathan Kantor
CW2 Jonathan Kantor
10 y
Especially when the best dowsing rods you have are your M-4s
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG First Sergeant
1
1
0

Be careful what you wish for. Tests show that the people who REALLY have to worry about bodyfat percentages, i.e. >20%BF would probably test higher with calipers than circumference.

 

"A closer analysis of individual data shows a general trend. It seems that the abdominal skin fold method over estimates BF when compared to the seven point method. The abdominal circumference method, on the other hand, underestimates BF when the subject is above average BF according to the seven site method. This "cut off" seemed to be somewhere within 15.59 % BF and 22.68 % BF. When BF was 15.59 % and lower, according to the seven site method, the abdominal circumference method over estimated BF. It can be seen how an greater than normal musculature of the midsection could falsely decrease the LBW calculation therefore increasing the % BF calculation. The over estimation of BF on some calculations and an under estimation of BF on others is most likely responsible for the seemingly high correlation with the seven point method shown above. Despite the ambiguity of the abdominal circumference method, it was thought to be more reliable than the seven site skinfold with those individuals above 22.68 % BF. It is known that the more obese individuals pose a greater threat to the reliability of skinfold measurements. (Lohman and Roche)"

 

http://www.exrx.net/Testing/BFTestComparisonStudy.html

 

(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Squad Leader
1
1
0
Edited 10 y ago
Absolutely. And they don't even need to "find" it, it's always been available. It's called using BF % calipers and a BF index chart. Takes 3 times to get an accurate percentage, exact same as the tape method. EXCEPT its your actual body fat percentage! And for people talking about time and costs, a pair is cheaper or equal to the price of the tape, and takes as much time to do. And it is accurate, as long as you follow the instructions (pinch 1 inch above the right hip bone ((using same place, less error)) pinch with calipers.) and ta da! You have an accurate body fat %. My issue with the tape method, is you have soldiers that OBVIOUSLY have "more to love and lots of it" that somehow pass tape. How? They have big necks. Not cool big Army, lets stop the madness and switch to the calipers. 
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
Yes 1SG, one inch above the hipbone 3x with calipers will give a true and accurate body fat percentage.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
PV - what tables to you use?  I mean, let's use an example:  25 y/o male, and the calipers say 1.5"  What now?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
10 y

Using the charts at http://www.accumeasurefitness.com/charts.html , a 25 year old male with a, for example, 18mm reading is 18.6 percent bodyfat 1SG.

(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG First Sergeant
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
SPC Kaleel,

The caliper that you are talking about using is one designed so that you can use it yourself at home and get a better idea of your fitness. If you are off a fraction of a fraction of an inch in any direction your reading will be completely inaccurate. The reason for the tape over the caliper is the simplicity of it and the ability to train someone to do it. Even with a caliper and a properly trained person doing the testing you are still going to have people who are fit that just hold fat in the wrong spot. Just like everything else in the Army we have to do things for the majority not the minority.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Senior Counterintelligence Sergeant
1
1
0
So what the I see hear is that its the fastest way to do it right, but yet how much of our day is spent sitting around all day? Last time I checked the senior leadership are the ones that are always crunched for time, the Master Fitness Trainer conducting the tests can easily be trained on the caliper method that is more accurate so I dont want to hear that there is such a lack of time to administer a more accurate test. Cost effective, how much is a caliper instrument? The Army has more wasteful spending than any other organization I have ever seen.  I think that the fact of the matter is that we just dont want to change it much like the current PT program, which is a bunch of BS and needs to change. We changed the PT program for the new generation of soldier that never went outside to play as a kid and was sheltered indoors glued to an XBox or PS3.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Assistant Operations Officer (S3)
1
1
0
Edited 10 y ago
Yes, but as other have already said, the tape method is the fastest and least knowledgeable method but also grossly innaccurate. About a +/- 4% error.

I started in 2013 using a 9 point caliper system (and a trained person measuring) that is almost as good as a water test. The army bodyfat tape test got me at 24%, right on the edge for my age (41), (actually it's 26% I'm so used to <= 40...LOL) while the 9 point bodyfat test got me at 22.6%. This was July of 2013.

Passing an APFT is never an issue, I score around 263 - 275 most times. I've never failed a bodyfat test EVER. Today 2014 using the 9 point bodyfat test I'm at 17% BF and by May I should be at 15%. I have lost 1 inch on my waist.

The big problem is soldiers at all levels (SGT - LTC) don't properly council others on the problem and it isn't your physical training, IT'S YOUR DIET. Pt helps but diet is key and the Army is sadly lacking in diet training.

The tape test can also discourage because when losing weight the last part to go is your waist so you may do all this extra work and not see anything and that is discouraging.

The 9 point BF test can pick this up. You will lose in your arms, neck, face, legs before you lose one inch on your stomach.

Also using a scale is also discouraging because you may lose fat and gain muscle and think nothing happened. My first weight was 246.4 Lbs and at 22.6% bodyfat my bodyfat weight was  55.6 Lbs. Today I'm 245.2 with 17% bodyfat giving me a fat weight of 41.8 Lbs. That's a 13.8 Lb purely fat weight drop.

This is all about physical fitness and we all can do better. but I would say to go to a 9 point system and train all soldiers on how to measure properly. but also I am stressing diet as well and to train all officer and enlisted NCO's on diet.

Will it happen, probably not, we will stick with the tape test because it's easier. But I would recommend all soldiers to check with a 9 point caliper test and use those measurements to track progress.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Human Resources Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
1SG, I fully agree with your comment about bad choice.  But then I also have seen other factor where the chain of command does not do there part to lead from the front and support the Soldier who are trying to make the best effort in correcting their deficiency.  Example I work at place where several individuals that are in charge believe PT is not part of a Soldier Duty Day.  And this is Senior Leadership that is in the military and ones that have retired from the military and are Civilian DOD now.  So like anything else the buck starts and stops at the top, because without the proper top cover and guidance what is a Soldier to do when this is the first time experiencing the military.  I have found ways of working around it, but many do not carry the same backbone that I carry about standing your ground for what is right and morally correct.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
SFC - Real plain and simple, anyone who believes PT is not part of the Total Soldier Package and should not be included in the duty day is wrong.  I'm a Reservist and we do PT during our Battle Assembly weekends.  I see no reason why Active Duty should feel different (unless they're in the field or something like that).   About your point on doing what is right and morally correct - you're also setting an example for your subordinates.  If you get hit by a beer truck tomorrow, your Soldiers will still know what right looks like and act accordingly.  People like me and you strive 24/7/365 to leave the Army better than we found it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Assistant Operations Officer (S3)
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
The diet is a tough one and I guess another quote can be. "Abs are formed in the Kitchen". But talking about diet, there are so many things with it that it can be very confusing.

A good question is how does a soldier calculate his daily calorie in take ?

The general formula for fat loss is basically expend more calories than you intake. But how much ?

Most fitness trainers say a calorie deficit of 500-1000 calories per day. You can also do 1000 by limiting 500 calories in meals and workout burning 500 extra calories. I have experimented with low calorie expenditures and you will like you have no energy and also the body will lower it's metabolism to compensate, and that's what you don't want.

Here is a formula I am using to calculate calories per day.
http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/

I also add an activity factor using the Harris Benedict Equation
http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/harris-benedict-equation/

Mine was 1.2 because I'm a software engineer and sit down most of the day.

So my daily calorie intake was 2688 calories.

Lately I use this number to calculate a 40%/40%/20% for Protein/Carbs/Fat and track these numbers.

Gettng my heart rate zones.
http://www.digifit.com/heartratezones/maximum-heart-rate.asp?Age=41#table

Regardless I'm no expert but am working on it and sharing what I have found so far.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
CPT -  Many Soldiers, particularly those in BCT, have little choice about diet.  Many just eat what's put in front of them and wolf it down like it's their last meal for a week. Between the high carbs and even higher sodium, I'm amazed anyone loses weight.  A BCT Soldier would have to be diet-savvy before even entering the DFAC to know what his/her best choices are, and sometimes, there just aren't any.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close