Posted on Sep 13, 2016
CW5 Desk Officer
26.9K
445
211
14
14
0
Is Snowden a patriot or a traitor? Should President Obama pardon him, as he's asking in this CNN story?

I'll cast the first no vote as soon as I post this question. Just so you know.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/13/technology/edward-snowden-pardon-obama/index.html
Posted in these groups: I 1 snowden speaks vf SnowdenImages Barack Obama74a76fb2 EspionageNSA
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 53
CPT Tom Monahan
0
0
0
No. He should stand trial. Now is the State can't make its case or the jury chooses to nullify the statutes so be it. Let the process work.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt SHF Satellite Communications Operator-Maintainer
0
0
0
Lol he can't and Snowden wouldn't be dumb enough to come back
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Management Analyst
0
0
0
No. First off, you can only be pardoned if officially charged. Has that even happened yet? Secondly, he ran to Russia and gave them all the information he stole. He is no hero. He is a coward. If he truly believed in what he did, he would have stayed here and faced the consequences.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
0
0
0
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Mary G.
0
0
0
So, after considerable thought I have to say "hell no" to the specific question - but not because I consider Snowden either a traitor or a patriot - although I am leaning strongly towards him choosing to be a criminal with unstated nefarious motives, rather than someone who claims he is motivated only by the best interests of our nation.
Why would President Obama or any subsequent president be foolish enough to pardon Edward Snowden without a trial? Americans deserve to have him put on trial, and Snowden deserves a trial although he seems to not want one.
I understand the trepidation Snowden might have about trusting the justice system. Those who are guilty might be afraid of not being able to fool it. Those who are innocent might be afraid the cards would be stacked against them, no matter what - a justified fear, unfortunately when we consider unwarranted shootings by police throughout the nation who are not held culpable.
Our justice system is very slow . . . "the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial" . . . so is the problem a matter of the wheels of justice being excessively slow because of thorough investigation, or because of being excessively manipulated to make a predetermined unjust outcome seem just? It is a question no one should have to ask about our justice system.
That question is my main interest in the Snowden issue. I do not expect clarity about it any time soon.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Michael Mead
0
0
0
Snowden wasn't a Soldier, he was a contracted civilian Intel analyst. But he was witness to repeated intentional constitutional violations, and saw the consequences of sticking around to blow the whistle were more than he'd bargained for. So he split. Patriot or traitor, I dunno. But not a coward.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SPC Michael Mead
SPC Michael Mead
>1 y
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - That you trust these folks is up to you, and you can defend the spooks all you want. I have no reason to trust my government, no obligation to either, and plenty of reasons not to. Given the repeated constitutional excesses, the illegal and warrantless surveillances of American citizens, the seemingly treasonous insistence on subordinating American ideals and interests to ideological priorities, and the willingness to detain people in secret prisons, I have no faith that our government wouldn't expend every effort in making Snowden disappear. And not because he's a traitor who betrayed his country, but because he's a whistleblower who embarrassed a tyrant posing as a president.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
>1 y
If you want to be paranoid, un-trusting, and essentially a pessimistic person, so be it. I'm not going to change your mind despite offering you some insight to the other point of view. Nothing done was illegal and the NSA has still retained the capability to do what you're bitching about (i.e. nothing has changed). Now, I've been through the training (similar to Snowden's), I understand the points of the law we are charged to protect and report discrepancies on and I imagine you have absolutely no insight to that world (which with your pessimism is probably for the best).

As usual I hear people such as yourself bitch and whine about programs you no little about (only what a person you don't even know is telling you) and you are all too willing to drink his kool aid. What you can't seem to do is offer the alternate solution. So, you tell me how, from a cyber perspective, you would address the threat imposed by our enemies with regards to espionage, C2 from within the country, communications, conducting our investigations, and cyber attack? Go ahead, tell us how to address the threat from within through the cyberspace realm. Before you take this on, please address the procedures that are currently in place to enable one to do their job, with regards to EC 12333, the NSA's policies, and the DOD's. I imagine you won't answer this question, because you have either not read the respective policies or taken the training. Instead you're going to point fingers at people like myself and accuse us of being complicate with breaking the law.

Yeah, I'm done with you until you can recite to me the applicable laws, policy, and instructions in place which address this issue and where exactly you think they do not. If you're going to bring me more conspiracy crap like the government will make people disappear if they actually do the right thing, there is no sense if debating this with you. Have a great day.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Michael Mead
SPC Michael Mead
>1 y
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - Well, we've surely gone pretty far afield from the point of this, which was merely a question over Snowden, i.e., is he a traitor or not. And it's been a fun ride, and I admit, an educational one, if I can withstand a touch of condescension to counter my apprehension (I won't say 'paranoia.') And no, I don't have all the answers, and neither do you, your arrogance notwithstanding. But I maintain that the Constitution ensures certain protections, which I believe the Regime routinely ignores.
Best of luck to you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
>1 y
I do have and know what the answers are. I'm work in the field where we can potentially have to execute them. That's not arrogance, it's insight and experience and you can feel free to speak with all the others with cyber warfare backgrounds on this subject to see if what we say is consistent. Anyone can learn more about this area and understand it better and I've challenged you to do so through just the policy and guidance. But your position stems from both paranoia (yes paranoia... Read your own posts/) and the lack of understanding on how the programs work. As I would with any of the Airmen who would come to me with problems to the solutions we have in place, I am going to ask what is your alternate course of action, solution, etc. Don't just bitch about your problem with the system... Offer the solution to it. Once again, you can't because you don't understand it. Read the policy and guidance and fee free to have another conversation about it. If all you can come up with is "I don't trust the government", you will never be satisfied by any solution. So then I ask, why do you bother debating it? And for that matter why would you continue living in this country? After all, according to you, all we do is make "innocent" Americans disappear and rip up the Constitution we swore to protect.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ David Creamer
0
0
0
Only a Conditional pardon. First he has to tell the Gov't everything he did, turn over all the information he has and then be on a supervised parole for the next 10 years. After completing that, then he could be granted a pardon.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
>1 y
Disagree. Everyday he spends in Russia not facing the authorities in the US in person is another day he is proving to be a traitor. If he were to come home and face the consequences for improper/unauthorized removal disclosure of classified information, followed by a significant amount of prison time I would gain a small measure of respect for him (for essentially owning up to doing something completely stupid).
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA A.A. Hall
0
0
0
He'll no! His actions got troops killed. Then he ran to Russia.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Levi Chambers
0
0
0
Treason during war time. I believe that the law is pretty clear about that.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SrA Crm Developer
SrA (Join to see)
>1 y
When was the declaration of war made in conformance with the law?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Motor Vehicle Operator
0
0
0
Although some might say there was some benefit out of what he did, he's a traitor
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close