Posted on Jun 22, 2015
SGM Matthew Quick
190K
1.73K
755
66
66
0
6e0d3e68
What do these US military bases have in common?

Fort Bragg
Fort Rucker
Fort Hood
Fort Lee
Fort Benning
Fort Gordon
Fort A.P. Hill
Fort Polk
Fort Pickett
Camp Beauregard (Operated by the Louisiana National Guard)

They are all named for Confederate generals. There’s been talk for years about whether this is appropriate, and now in wake of Charleston and the South Carolina Confederate flag, it’s coming up again.

Do you think these posts should be renamed to honor people who fought in the U.S. Army exclusively? Vote, and share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Take the Poll:
http://www.stripes.com/military-life/military-history/poll-should-us-military-bases-named-after-confederates-be-renamed-1.353890#
Posted in these groups: E83e9618 Confederate Flag
Edited 9 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 282
COL Charles Williams
4
4
0
No, but it is an interesting question and discussion. SGM Matthew Quick
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Jim Wolverton
4
4
0
Of course not! Is this really even a question to concern our government with? Ridiculous.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Lee Pradia
4
4
0
Keep the names, let's get rid of the flag.
(4)
Comment
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
MSG Steve Howell, indeed we can. Although I would say the character of our elected representatives says at least as much about us and the values of American voters as it does about the person elected.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
9 y
SFC (Join to see) - and which President would that have been? I'm straining my brain trying to recall and am coming up blank.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Armor Crew Member
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
I stand corrected, I confused myself thinking about guys that were officers and then left and went to fight for the Confederacy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Daniel Deiler
4
4
0
No. I don't believe the flag should be removed either. Just because certain groups have prostituted the flag and now believe it stands for something other than what it's originators believed and founded it under is the problem of those that believe it stands for racism.
(4)
Comment
(0)
CW4 Pam Collins
CW4 Pam Collins
9 y
I agree to some extent. The confederate flag has different meanings for different people. Unfortuately, like the swastika, it has come to mean something devisive and ugly. Its a shame for those that see it as nothing more than part of the South's history, but it does and flying it anywhere but a museum, like the swastika, can create nothing but strife.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Daniel Deiler
SSG Daniel Deiler
9 y
It truly is unfortunate that instead of education, we are pushed towards the route of censorship and/or removal to avoid future incidents. In a world and a nation where our own US flag cannot be flown proudly for fear of causing offense, I should not be surprised that this is happening.
(3)
Reply
(0)
LCDR Naval Aviator
LCDR (Join to see)
9 y
The Confederacy was largely about slavery and the subjugation of an entire race, and that fact is entirely confirmed in the Cornerstone Address. It doesn't require a hijacking by any group to be racist.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Daniel Deiler
SSG Daniel Deiler
9 y
A couple of thoughts;

First is that the flag is continuously Mis-represented as the flag of the Confederate States of America. This is false. It is the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia.

Secondly, after the Confederacy's defeat at the hands of the Union in the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, Stephens attempted to retract the statements made in his speech. Denying slavery as the Confederacy's cause for starting the war, he contended, to the contrary, that the war was rooted in constitutional differences.

Third, the assertion that the CSA was founded largely on the shoulders of institution of slavery based on one speech given by one man at one single given moment in time. Alexander Stephens was not speaking for the entire nation. He was speaking for politicians and some plantation owners by and large. Was Hitler speaking for all of Germany and for all Germans during his reign as dictator? I submit that he was not. To ascertain that Stephens was speaking for all Southerners and citizens of the CSA would be incorrect and a feeble notion at best.

While the Confederacy did heavily rely on utilizing slavery to bolster its economy and the subjugation of an entire race was a large part of the fundamental differences between the Northern and Southern states, it did not IMO define who the South was. That, to me, is like saying the Iraqi, Syrian or Afghan flags represent terrorism. Or that the actions of Sadaam Hussein defined who the Iraqi people were. Those who have that mindset are wrong. That is at the heart of this entire matter. To allow a symbol to have the kind of power the flag of the Army of Northern Virginia has to some closed minded individuals is saddening to me because it represents so much more than just one thing. Take into consideration our own American flag...if you were to ask 100 people what it means, what it stands for, you're likely to get 100 different answers as it represents many things to many people. The same can be said for the flag in question.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CDR David Spoerl
3
3
0
Absolutely not! These proud leaders did what their civilian leaders asked them to do. This question is too PC.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
GySgt Melissa Gravila
3
3
0
I think the old saying holds true "Those who forget about history are doomed to repeat it." We should never bow down or coddle a small group to just appease them, we end up alienating a larger group and fracturing the foundation. I am done with these "factions" for lack of a better term crying and whining about the manner their freedoms are provided for them. No, I can't think of a single person who has had a perfect past, but I wouldn't trade mine, or my heritage for anything. Semper Fi
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
3
3
0
NO.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
8 y
I think that says it all!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Alex Robinson
3
3
0
We should rename them only after Senator Robert Byrd's name is taken off all the buildings in West Virginia. He was a klansman after all
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Christian D. Orr
3
3
0
Not only "No," but "Hell, No!" Enough kowtowing to the jackbooted totalitarian Thought Police thugs already!!
(3)
Comment
(0)
CPL Richard Flagg
CPL Richard Flagg
9 y
Thank you CPT you said it well; I have learned that the most intolerant close minded individuals are the so called "liberal elite" and their minions who drink the Kool Aid like its Air, have you ever noticed that whenever you express an opinion differing from the liberal persons; instead of your argument being attacked personal attacks and name calling are heaped upon you?

Why stoop to such low juvenile levels as they do when their "facts" don't support their arguments. Just keep fighting the good fight and don't bend to these strong arm tactics of the PC Toought Pokice. Never surrender your believes or who you are: when facts support your case.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Capt Christian D. Orr
Capt Christian D. Orr
9 y
Amen, brother!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PFC James Sander
3
3
0
THEY SHOULD LEAVE THE NAMES ALONE. THEY SHOULD ALSO READ THERE HISTORY BOOKS SO THEY KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE REBEL BATTLEFLAG AND THE REAL CONFEDERATE FLAG AND THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close