Should women be required to register with the Selective Service upon turning 18?

Speaking of draftees that stayed.

http://www.dvidshub.net/news/146298/last-continuously-serving-draftee-retires-after-42-years-service

To keep it simple. With the current age of equality and fields opening up to women, why not or just abolish it all together. In times of great need, the volunteers will roll in as in times past.
My 2 bits.

Be carefull what you ask for.

I think we cover enough with males registering for selective service that would preclude females from doing it as well. If we had to dip into the female population for a draft, we would be in serious trouble. Not taking anything away from the female population, but with as many males that must register at age 18, there should be no need for females to do the same.

Absolutely.  Men are currently required to do so before being considered for any federal or state employment. All things being equal in the military now, limiting the requirement to only males is outdated and, by current standards, sexist.

ABSOLUTELY! The biggest form of gender based discrimination is ONLY forcing Males present in the US at 18 (legal, illegal, that's right illegal aliens are required to register for the selective service between 18-26) to register for the Draft! Women can serve in in Work of National Importance (read "non-armed forces" service) until we have removed the combat prohibitions completely against their gender. I know families that have only male children of draft age, as well as the opposite. How is it fair to tell an all male, draft age family (sons between 18-26), that your children are at risk of being drafted and their gender mirror family of all female draft age children, you are not at risk at all??? The pain of the draft must be spread out between gender as well as class. Yes, we do have different socio-economic classes here in the US and the Middle class and Poor are disproportionately serving in the military. The rich and upper class are most MIA when it comes to military service. My first cousin and my brother in law all have three girls each in their families and are completely safe from a potential draft. This is incredibly unequal and unfair. The last 13 years plus of GWOT have fallen disproportionately on young men and their families as it has on all of America's wars since our founding as a Nation.

No. The Selective Service should be entirely abolished. There is nothing in the history of the United States to suggest that a conscript Army is either good for the nation as a whole, or that we cannot make do with an all-volunteer Army. If a draft is needed to fight a war, then we have already lost it.

I kind of think they should, but I also think it's a moot point...by the time something gets bad enough that our civilian leadership is willing to institute another draft, women will already be fighting an enemy in our own country.

I vote no.  I'm not against women in the military, I just don't think it should be mandatory for them should the need arise.  

I say yes; equality doesn't mean getting all of the benefits and receiving none of the consequences. You cannot say you have the right to do something without carrying any of the obligation.