Posted on Jun 15, 2015
RallyPoint Shared Content
19
19
0
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.32 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.49 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.40 pm
Originally published on finance.yahoo.com:
--
The US Army is finally set to phase out one of the most consistent images of modern American military power: the Humvee.
Earlier this year, the US Army announced the three finalists for the massive contract to replace the iconic Humvee, which has been in service for almost three decades.

Oshkosh Corporation, defense contractor Lockheed Martin, and Humvee-maker AM General each delivered 22 prototypes of their Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLVT) to military evaluators, who are running elaborate tests on the vehicles to determine the best fit.

Since the 1990s, AM General's Humvee has been the US military's workhorse, first seeing action in the Gulf War.

Despite its ubiquity, the Humvee has caused some serious headaches for American forces. As Wired notes, the Humvee was designed in the 1980s as an off-road carrier to transport troops and equipment quickly across Eastern Europe in a theoretical ground war against the then Soviet Union.

But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Humvee's mission changed. It was deployed to the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan, where US commanders quickly discovered that it was dangerously under equipped to protect troops against close-combat urban fire and improvised explosive devices.

With this problem in mind, the vehicles in this summer's competition are all far more resistant to explosive blasts. The new vehicles are smaller, so they can be more easily airlifted and transported. They're also light and better equipped to deal with the urban and off-road patrol duties that the Humvee took on in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The winning payout for the contract will be huge. As the Dallas Morning News reports, the US Army plans to spend billions on at least 20,000 vehicles, and the Marine Corps will likely buy around 5,000. If the vehicle is more successful, it could be an even greater windfall — since the '80s, the AM General has produced 250,000 Humvees for the US military.

Here are the three vehicles that could replace the Humvee:

Oshkosh's L-ATV

Oshkosh's entry into the competition is the Light Combat Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle.

The company has one advantage. After the Army realized in the early 2000s that the Humvee left troops vulnerable to blasts, the Pentagon ordered thousands of Oshkosh's Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles for deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As the name suggests, Oshkosh's MRAP was much better suited to transport troops through these environments. Wired notes that the MRAP was so successful at sustaining blasts that some troops reportedly didn't realize when they ran over bombs.

Oshkosh's entry in the JLTV contest attempts to expand upon the MRAP's success. The L-ATV is a lighter, smaller vehicle than the MRAP and can be more quickly and easily airlifted. This makes the vehicle preferable to the MRAP, which is large and can't be deployed to areas where it needs to maneuver in crowded spaces.

Oshkosh believes that since the company demonstrated its proficiency with the MRAP, the JLTV is a natural transition.

"The Oshkosh M-ATV is the only vehicle performing the JLTV mission profile in operations today," Oshkosh Vice President of Business Development Jennifer Christiansen told Business Insider in an email.

"This is where Oshkosh is truly unique because no other company has successfully transitioned more new military vehicle programs into production for the US Department of Defense," Christiansen said.

The vehicle also has some unique features. If the military wishes to make their vehicles a little greener, Oshkosh threw an optional hybrid-diesel engine into the mix to help increase fuel efficiency.

Lockheed Martin's JLTV

Designed with anti-guerilla combat in mind, Lockheed is playing on somewhat unfamiliar ground in the ground fight. Oshkosh and AM General both have troop carriers in use by the US military, while Lockheed is still more widely known for its high-tech aircraft and missile systems.

Like the other competitors, Lockheed aimed to make its slightly boxier vehicle lighter and tested it for blast-resistance.

"It can take a soldier everywhere, but can survive everything that they could survive in an MRAP," Trevor McWilliams, a former soldier whose truck was hit with an IED, said in a Lockheed promotional video.

Lockheed is also hoping that the vehicle's price tag will persuade the military to adopt its proposal. The defense contractor's website touts the vehicle's gas mileage, low production cost, and easy adaptability in case mechanics want to add on or upgrade the car in the shop.

"We are providing the most capable vehicle to our soldiers and our marines, and we're going to do it a very affordable cost," Lockheed Martin program director Katheryn Hasse told Army Recognition in 2014.

AM General's BRV-O

Though the Humvee itself may be on the way out, the lessons it learned have been passed on to AM General's 21st century version.

This time around, AM General has built the Humvee's largest weakness into the vehicle's name: the Blast-Resistant Vehicle Off-Road. The company is highlighting the renewed safety of their BRV-O, touting its blast-resistant frame and space for amour add-ons.

"The Humvee was not designed for underbody protection, so the BRV-O has a higher ground clearance and is able to apply a protection kit to the bottom of the vehicle," AM General Vice President of Business Development Chris Vanslanger told CNN in 2012.

According to AM General, the BRV-O is also the only vehicle equipped with a system that allows all passengers to connect to the military's C4ISR network, which helps troops, aircraft, and commanders link up and coordinate movements on the battlefield.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-high-tech-vehicles-vying-182352504.html
Posted in these groups: Vehicle Vehicle
Avatar feed
Responses: 45
SGT William Howell
27
27
0
Shouldn't ISIS have a say in what we get? I mean it will only be a couple years till we give these to the Iraqis and they will in turn hand them over to the enemy?
(27)
Comment
(0)
SSG Laureano Pabon
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
outstanding
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Merino
18
18
0
Now? Let the two wars happen and then have an epiphany. I'll keep saying this until I die....you don't take away the OH-58D from the ground forces as a cost saving measure only to turn around and upgrade ground forces with all new toys. There are plenty of uparmored vehicles now (a day late and a dollar short). Let me guess, we will give them to the police departments for $1. Money well spent. Even uparmored, these new vehicles will not provide protection equal to that of a true scout helicopter providing route reconnaissance. I'm not bashing Apaches, but they don't have the ability to have small arms hanging out providing immediate suppression of the enemy. How do you eliminate a threat in a crowded town on crowded streets when all you can do is fire a 30mm ( for area suppression, not a precision weapon). In this media sensitive world, good luck getting clearance for fires with an Apache. Save the Kiowa.
(18)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen C.
LTC Stephen C.
9 y
Sounds like you know better than me, SGT James Murphy! I just snatched this photo off the internet! I never the knew the models and variants. I just rode in them and drove them!
(3)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
M422 mighty might
M151 w canvas
Gun jeep
Nuke jeep
No, SGT James Murphy, the vehicle LTC Stephen C. uploaded a picture of is either a Willys MB or Ford GPW, the two most most common models manufactured during World War 2.

The Mighty Might was an expensive short-lived bastard-child that the Marines used for a while. The Mighty Might looked like a jeep which flattened its nose against a wall, and eventually the Marines abandoned it and adopted the Army's M151 quarter-ton truck (which is what most of the folks on here will remember as jeeps)

http://www.memorialmuseum.org/displays/military-jeeps
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Boots Attaway
SFC Boots Attaway
9 y
1LT William Clardy - Looks like something for my 5 yr old grandson. LOL
(1)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
SFC Boots Attaway, that's kind of funny, because one thing I vaguely remember from when I was in elementary school was that the funky-looking Marine model was actually spelled as "Mighty Mite" -- almost like parody of "Mighty Mouse". I think it was in one of those "big picture on every page" CB Colby books.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT John Wesley
14
14
0
Image
I'm going with this! Plus a 44 ounce cup holder!
(14)
Comment
(0)
CPT Owner
CPT (Join to see)
9 y
Why stop at 44? I need the 64oz big gulp holder for the long hauls! (:
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT John Wesley
SGT John Wesley
9 y
@Spc Parker
I hope you are finding Korea to your liking! Stay safe!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
The U.S. Army is finally set the phase out one of the most iconic images of the modern American military: the Humvee
MSG Brad Sand
9
9
0
I still miss the M-151s There was no where we could not take them...and if you got stuck, you could just about get out, lift it up and move by hand.
(9)
Comment
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
9 y
CW4 Bradley Podner

I remember driving our's on the tank trails and coming back on to roads and being told, "Those jeeps can't go there. Those trails are too rugged." My thoughts were, 'I am glad you didn't tell us that before we had all that fun driving on them all day and obviously you don't have any clue of what is too rugged for these gun jeeps.' It was a bit interesting when we are nearing ridges because an M-60 or M-113 would have gone right over the top of us and not even know why the dirt was knocked off their tracks?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Mark Lefler
9
9
0
its nice and all, but I think to a degree, too little, too late.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SFC Mark Merino
SFC Mark Merino
9 y
You ain't lying!
(1)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Mark Lefler
LCpl Mark Lefler
9 y
not saying we shouldn't but they should of done this years and years ago.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT William Howell
7
7
0
Do any of these have cup holders?
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Bink Romanick
6
6
0
I've lived through the M38A1, the M151A1-A2, and the Humvee. In my view every time they changed, it was worse. The Humvee couldn't get into places the 1/4t could and morphed into a vehicle it was never meant to be. I hope that this is better force the force, but color me a skeptic.
(6)
Comment
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
9 y
LTC Bink Romanick

Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic. Skeptic.

(Not sure what color that was supposed to be but I am one to follow orders.P
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Bink Romanick
LTC Bink Romanick
9 y
Someone has to be MSG Sand....it's healthy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM David Heidke
5
5
0
The L-ATV seems to be modeled after the M-ATV which has horrible blind spots.

If they plan on replacing HMMWVs with these, the amount of accidents due to not being able to see out of them is going to skyrocket.

For stateside they need to just paint some SUVs with flat green paint.
(5)
Comment
(0)
CPT Graduate Student
CPT (Join to see)
9 y
SSG Roger Ayscue, we should not have state side and deployment vehicles. Train as you fight, and we should get out of this TPE mentality, we need to up our maintenance game, and train today with the equipment we will fight with tonight.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Graduate Student
CPT (Join to see)
9 y
CSM, problem solved, all vehicles will have four ground guides when moving and be covered in a box of chem lights.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM David Heidke
CSM David Heidke
9 y
CPT (Join to see) that will be tricky on a motor march from Londonderry to JBMDL... ;-)

Knowing the way the government designed the hummer, with circa 1945 canvas seats, I think I'd rather have a CUCV.

And M-ATVs while a blast to drive would be deadly at speed here in the US.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Dale W.
SSgt Dale W.
9 y
CPT (Join to see) Don't forget the reflective gear for the ground guides.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Safety Technician
4
4
0
Edited 9 y ago
So, vehicles were produced to participate in a war that never happened, and that equipment was deployed in a combat zone where it was less than effective.

Why does it seem like we're doing it again? Maybe I'm crazy, but with the development of UAVs, isn't it very likely the next thing to tear through us like the IEDs did will be small, air-surface missile/munitions.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
4
4
0
Everything has a reason and a season
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close