Posted on Jun 15, 2015
RallyPoint Shared Content
19
19
0
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.32 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.49 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.40 pm
Originally published on finance.yahoo.com:
--
The US Army is finally set to phase out one of the most consistent images of modern American military power: the Humvee.
Earlier this year, the US Army announced the three finalists for the massive contract to replace the iconic Humvee, which has been in service for almost three decades.

Oshkosh Corporation, defense contractor Lockheed Martin, and Humvee-maker AM General each delivered 22 prototypes of their Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLVT) to military evaluators, who are running elaborate tests on the vehicles to determine the best fit.

Since the 1990s, AM General's Humvee has been the US military's workhorse, first seeing action in the Gulf War.

Despite its ubiquity, the Humvee has caused some serious headaches for American forces. As Wired notes, the Humvee was designed in the 1980s as an off-road carrier to transport troops and equipment quickly across Eastern Europe in a theoretical ground war against the then Soviet Union.

But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Humvee's mission changed. It was deployed to the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan, where US commanders quickly discovered that it was dangerously under equipped to protect troops against close-combat urban fire and improvised explosive devices.

With this problem in mind, the vehicles in this summer's competition are all far more resistant to explosive blasts. The new vehicles are smaller, so they can be more easily airlifted and transported. They're also light and better equipped to deal with the urban and off-road patrol duties that the Humvee took on in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The winning payout for the contract will be huge. As the Dallas Morning News reports, the US Army plans to spend billions on at least 20,000 vehicles, and the Marine Corps will likely buy around 5,000. If the vehicle is more successful, it could be an even greater windfall — since the '80s, the AM General has produced 250,000 Humvees for the US military.

Here are the three vehicles that could replace the Humvee:

Oshkosh's L-ATV

Oshkosh's entry into the competition is the Light Combat Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle.

The company has one advantage. After the Army realized in the early 2000s that the Humvee left troops vulnerable to blasts, the Pentagon ordered thousands of Oshkosh's Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles for deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As the name suggests, Oshkosh's MRAP was much better suited to transport troops through these environments. Wired notes that the MRAP was so successful at sustaining blasts that some troops reportedly didn't realize when they ran over bombs.

Oshkosh's entry in the JLTV contest attempts to expand upon the MRAP's success. The L-ATV is a lighter, smaller vehicle than the MRAP and can be more quickly and easily airlifted. This makes the vehicle preferable to the MRAP, which is large and can't be deployed to areas where it needs to maneuver in crowded spaces.

Oshkosh believes that since the company demonstrated its proficiency with the MRAP, the JLTV is a natural transition.

"The Oshkosh M-ATV is the only vehicle performing the JLTV mission profile in operations today," Oshkosh Vice President of Business Development Jennifer Christiansen told Business Insider in an email.

"This is where Oshkosh is truly unique because no other company has successfully transitioned more new military vehicle programs into production for the US Department of Defense," Christiansen said.

The vehicle also has some unique features. If the military wishes to make their vehicles a little greener, Oshkosh threw an optional hybrid-diesel engine into the mix to help increase fuel efficiency.

Lockheed Martin's JLTV

Designed with anti-guerilla combat in mind, Lockheed is playing on somewhat unfamiliar ground in the ground fight. Oshkosh and AM General both have troop carriers in use by the US military, while Lockheed is still more widely known for its high-tech aircraft and missile systems.

Like the other competitors, Lockheed aimed to make its slightly boxier vehicle lighter and tested it for blast-resistance.

"It can take a soldier everywhere, but can survive everything that they could survive in an MRAP," Trevor McWilliams, a former soldier whose truck was hit with an IED, said in a Lockheed promotional video.

Lockheed is also hoping that the vehicle's price tag will persuade the military to adopt its proposal. The defense contractor's website touts the vehicle's gas mileage, low production cost, and easy adaptability in case mechanics want to add on or upgrade the car in the shop.

"We are providing the most capable vehicle to our soldiers and our marines, and we're going to do it a very affordable cost," Lockheed Martin program director Katheryn Hasse told Army Recognition in 2014.

AM General's BRV-O

Though the Humvee itself may be on the way out, the lessons it learned have been passed on to AM General's 21st century version.

This time around, AM General has built the Humvee's largest weakness into the vehicle's name: the Blast-Resistant Vehicle Off-Road. The company is highlighting the renewed safety of their BRV-O, touting its blast-resistant frame and space for amour add-ons.

"The Humvee was not designed for underbody protection, so the BRV-O has a higher ground clearance and is able to apply a protection kit to the bottom of the vehicle," AM General Vice President of Business Development Chris Vanslanger told CNN in 2012.

According to AM General, the BRV-O is also the only vehicle equipped with a system that allows all passengers to connect to the military's C4ISR network, which helps troops, aircraft, and commanders link up and coordinate movements on the battlefield.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-high-tech-vehicles-vying-182352504.html
Posted in these groups: Vehicle Vehicle
Avatar feed
Responses: 45
SSG Military Police
3
3
0
I hope they are roomier in the doors and leg room. I don't know how the six footers manage, not to mention the body armor and gear we wear that hangs up on everything. I hope they test for fit also.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
SGM Steve Wettstein
9 y
The only spot with leg room was the gunners spot. So me being 6", the PSG and good with the M2 I took the gunners spot. It also gave me better situation awareness.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Elphick
3
3
0
This is just another example showing that we haven't figured out how to fight wars, just what toys we want when we do.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
9 y
Well said and eloquently expressed.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC William Swartz Jr
3
3
0
I remember turning in our M151 Jeeps for the Hummers in late '88 or early '89 at Ft. Carson and going through the NETT training on the Hummers, they were great back then as a replacement for the jeep. She's been a good workhorse for the military for a quarter century....
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Roger Ayscue
3
3
0
Forest whitaker eye
Hold the Phone!

The last time I looked, the bad guys ride around in Toyota Pickups. Hmmm....can you spell We got way too much money and no idea what to do with it?

Bring back the Gun Jeep and keep Hummvees. And use the money that they are going to put in this black hole of a money pit into funding, Oh I don't know, another Light Infantry RCT....Or maybe upkeep on the A-10 aircraft or hell, a c-17 full of rubber paddle balls to airdrop over ISIS to give them something constructive to do....
(3)
Comment
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
SSG Roger Ayscue, here's a clue as to why the Hilux is the poor man's tactical vehicle of choice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFnVZXQD5_k

EDIT: The first and second parts of that misadventure can be seen here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnWKz7Cthkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTPnIpjodA8
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue
SSG Roger Ayscue
9 y
1LT William Clardy I know, that is why I was saying the BAD GUYS are driving Toyotas. So I think the new options to replace the Hummers is a bit of overkill.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC David Hannaman
SPC David Hannaman
9 y
If they replaced Hummers with Toyota pickups our troops would blend in, be much harder to notice... just sayin'.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG G2 Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
SGT Scott Gross - the only thing that would give you away would be the hi-lift jack on the back of your hi-lux.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1LT William Clardy
3
3
0
And here I thought MRAPs were ugly...
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Hhc First Sergeant
2
2
0
I was aware the contract was awarded. This vehicle screams bulky and MRAP-like to me. I'm not a fan but my opinion could be swayed once I get to see it in action.

I see this and imagine the movie "Pentagon Wars" as they develop the Bradley Fighting Vehicle...
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
1SG (Join to see), I hope they are satisfactory for you to use. I wonder if they get any input from anyone that had problems with the Humvee?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Carl Cunningham
2
2
0
Yes, and I think the timing is right. With advances in technology, we can have a much better and hopefully safer product for Soldiers.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
CSM Carl Cunningham, I hope so too. The safeness of it should be the first thing done. IMO
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Jeff Stevenson
2
2
0
The most Iconic? I beg to differ. The M151 has seen much more shoreline, mountains, jungle than the HMMWV will ever see. And in some eyes, did much better. Might see a very quick change of heart depending on what region our next enemy pops up from. The weight of these will cause more problems than they are worth. And the logistics? I'm glad to be retired.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joseph Weber
2
2
0
I'm still pretty upset abut the M151 and M561. Can't talk about the HMMWV right now....
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Lloyd Becker BSBA-HCM, MBA
2
2
0
The M151A1 and the A2 have had a longer track record than the HUMVEE. So, what is the problem?
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joseph Weber
SFC Joseph Weber
9 y
Don't forget the M561!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Lloyd Becker BSBA-HCM, MBA
SSG Lloyd Becker BSBA-HCM, MBA
9 y
Baaa Baaaa Baaaa
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close