Posted on Nov 30, 2017
SPC Robert Coventry
8.31K
34
17
9
9
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 10
CW5 Jack Cardwell
7
7
0
Edited >1 y ago
Went to basic in the 70's. Not very impressed with latest product.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David T.
4
4
0
Hard is subjective. The society in the 80s and 90s was different than it is today and the military was also different. So I don't think that you really can compare them to the training today.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Environmental Specialist
3
3
0
First I went thru basic at Leonardwood in 92, as a corporal I assisted in BCT mission in the late 90's at Knox, as a SSG I was support Cadre(ran the rifle range at Jackson). First let me say the Standard at Knox was much higher than the standard at Jackson and I was shocked when I arrived at Jackson. Now I have no experience that Sill or Benning provide.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Environmental Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
That is what I noticed about Knox, the command that ran the Armour OSUT also ran the regular basic training there and they set one standard for all did not matter if you were OSUT or there for 9wk BCT your standard was the same. Jackson every training battalion had its own standard for everything. It just baffled me that basic training there did not really met the standards I was used to.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Dave Tracy
SGT Dave Tracy
>1 y
All too often people judge what they are told it is like in "basic" today by comparing it to what they experienced yesterday. Its the military equivalent to the old "I walked to school in knee-deep snow 5 miles uphill...BOTH ways!" stories that our parents told us, theirs to them, and we tell our kids.

What I appreciate about your thoughts is that they are based on actual experience with "basic"; once as a trainee a quarter century ago (feelin' old yet? ;-) ), and can compare/contrast to what going on in more recent times as cadre.

Granted, you can't speak to every experience at every post as you mentioned, and that does muddy the waters a bit when trying to compare/contrast "then to now", but to answer the question from a place of experience rather than "feeling" makes for a higher quality opinion.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Dave Tracy
SGT Dave Tracy
>1 y
CPT Lawrence Cable - I think you might be right about training standards and commensurate experiences in combat arms. I talked to a buddy of mine who went into the Infantry after we graduated high school in '91, and it doesn't sound like his experiences were too far removed from mine when I went through a few (ahem!) years later on.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
>1 y
SGT Dave Tracy - I went through with a number of retreads from the Vietnam Era coming back in to go to OCS. They were shocked about things like the strict weight standards and actually having to pass a PT test, which apparently didn't either keep you from graduating or deploying if you flunked at the time.
By the time I got in, most of the stupid abuse had gone away, to which I say good riddance. Stair stepped, realistic and incremental training produces far better results than physically and/or verbally driving someone in the ground. That doesn't mean that I don't think the Drills don't need to be highly directive, especially during the early phases when they are still trying to teach the recruits not to pee on their hands, but there is a point during OSUT when all the non hackers are gone and you just get better results with hard and realistic training.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close