Posted on Jan 25, 2015
SSG(P) Photographer/Owner
103K
298
132
7
7
0
I wear a ring on the pointer finger of my left hand. It's sterling silver and isn't even as big as a class ring. However, a SSG from my unit is constantly telling me to take it off because it is not a wedding ring. I tell him AR 670-1 states in section Jewlery that a soldier my wear a total of 2 rings; 1 on each hand, and a wedding band set is considered 1. It also states that rings must be conservative in taste and not extreme. Nowhere in the Regs does it say a soldier can only wear wedding rings. My ring meets all requirements but he still yells everytime he sees it. How can I educate him more or resolve the situation without taking off my ring and without getting chewed out?
Posted in these groups: Af2d4403 Conservative454274742x356 DA Pam 670-1
Avatar feed
Responses: 61
COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM
67
67
0
Recommendations:
- Confirm / deny with a senior NCO that your reading of AR 670-1 is correct.
- I would also recommend that you check your local unit SOP. Some MOSs and/or branches such as Armor that work around heavy vehicles, machinery, or equipment may have something as part of a safety issue not as part of an Army Regulation uniform issue. Easy to tear skin off a finger or a finger off if a ring gets caught and your body weight pulls you down.
- After above (if confirmed), ask the SSG to show you in AR 670-1 or unit SOP where it states that you are out of compliance. I would tell him that you are not questioning his authority but that you are trying to educate yourself and the best place to get educated is out of the source documents themselves.
- If above does not work and you feel strongly about it, I recommend seeing your PSG then 1SG if need be.
- Good luck.
(67)
Comment
(0)
SSG Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Operations Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
11 y
Having seen the image of the ring, take it off and soldier on, also jewelry should not be worn when working on around or in heavy equipment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Jay Dee
SSgt Jay Dee
11 y
Although, some good points were brought up about safety and food codes, etc... I would have to guess that this isn't an issue regarding those situations. The reason I say that is because the individual is being told that he can "only wear a wedding band". I know where I work, jewelry is prohibited, but it's ALL jewelry. You can't talk safety and food code but let an individual wear a wedding band. It's a double standard. But nonetheless, spot on remarks. But to help guide here, I simply would go with what the colonel said; ask the person if he could please show you because you "tried to find it but couldn't". If you tell him you found it and he's wrong, he may take it personal and that isn't necessary. By telling him you couldn't find it, and he feels he's correct, at first he'll feel superior by knowing where to find the answer and ultimately realize he's wrong and be forced to correct himself. Chances are, he doesn't know what he is talking about. Most of the time individuals make corrections, it's because "that's the way I was taught". People don't like to be wrong (young and old), so, they tent to pull rank instead of actually doing the research. You did the right thing by looking it up. What I would do is take it off, ask him to help you find it, let him see he is wrong, ask to wear your ring. But first, ask yourself if it's really even worth it? Does this ring have meaning? Cause even though you may win this time, now he's going to be on you like a hawk. It's the nature of being an alpha male. You caught me slippin, now I'm going to catch you and be all over it. If that makes sense.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Louis Kennedy
SPC Louis Kennedy
9 y
When I was in I did have Soldiers/NCO wear rings that were not Wedding Bands on their hands. I will just will agree with COL Smallfield, Have your NCO help you fully understand the Army Reg also any and all Unit SOPs on dress. As a side note I have seen that some units allow certain rings types but not others...so if it looks flashy then it was a no-go but if per say it was a class ring style then it was okay.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Don Ward
SFC Don Ward
9 y
SSG (Join to see) - what image?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Charles Hayden Passed 7/29/2025
17
17
0
Edited 11 y ago
SPC Cody Voye, Just follow the reg! And when your ring gets hung up on something and you lose your finger - cite the reg to the medics! The military is a hazardous profession, respect it!

You might even save a dated copy of the regulation, all of the reports you can get from the medics and photos for the VA.
(17)
Comment
(0)
CSM Charles Hayden Passed 7/29/2025
CSM Charles Hayden Passed 7/29/2025
9 y
MAJ (Join to see) - Captain, you explored other posts from SP Cody Voye? I am pleased someone else ID'd him.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC David Willis
SPC David Willis
8 y
MAJ (Join to see) - Didn't realize following regulations and expecting NCOs to be knowledgeable of the regs made you a barracks lawyer...
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Corrections Officer
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
Pathetic response from a leader.....
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Information Technology Specialist
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ(P) Operations Research/Systems Analysis
14
14
0
It is not a battle worth fighting. It's jewelry. The ring, in my opinion, is in a grey area. "Conservative" is in the eye of the beholder. In your case, it is in the eye of a superior. Take it off. Having to be constantly told to take it off can be construed as a lack of respect; which is far more offensive than the ring itself.
(14)
Comment
(0)
CW4 Air Ambulance Pilot
CW4 (Join to see)
9 y
If there is an Army Regulation or a local SOP forbidding him to wear the ring, then the NCO has a duty to correct him. What we must not do is confuse this NCO's personal preference with an actual requirement (as all too many NCOs do). This is what leads to young soldiers believing they are required to spend their paychecks on stetson hats, spurs, belt buckles, etc... rather than paying rent or feeding their kids. It is absolutely a battle worth fighting.
(7)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Ncoic, Cyber Operations
TSgt (Join to see)
9 y
This is wrong. If the wrong is within standards and wearing it is within regs, then you are allowed to wear it. for all you know the NCO is just trying to show that he is some kind of hotshot and flexing his "muscle". So, no; this person is well within their rights by reg to continuing to wear it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Don Ward
SFC Don Ward
9 y
MSG (Join to see) - What a load, and you are a MSG? Since when do NCO's give "lawful orders" to anyone. You may give directions, and you may pass on orders, but you have no authority to give any "orders".
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Instructor/Writer
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
SFC Don Ward - Yes you do. ADRP 6-22, Para. 1-21. Formal leadership is granted to individuals by virtue of assignment to positions of responsibility and is a function of rank and experience. The Uniform Code of Military Justice supports military leaders in positions of legitimate authority. Formal leader impose their authority over subordinates through lawful orders and directives.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Wearing a ring on the left hand; allowed by AR 670-1 but not by an NCO. How would you handle it?
SGT Journeyman Plumber
10
10
0
COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM has provided the best answer by far from what I've seen, but consider the following.

As I'm sure you've heard at some point there's an Army saying that goes something like "a leader can add to but can't take away" when it comes to regulations/policies. As far as I know this statement is not backed up officially by any regs (beyond of course the most liberal interpretations of regs generally covered by the "magic bullet"), but it's the culture of the Army and if you're going to fight it you're going to be fighting an uphill battle all the way. You might win, you might not, but take a moment to consider the negative attention you'd be inviting on yourself and the potential fallout that might entail.

Also consider that the exact verbiage used in AR 670-1 per your own research is that rings "must be conservative in taste and not extreme." What is and is not conservative or extreme is relative, and therefore up to a leaders discretion. After seeing a picture of the ring in the response you provided to TSgt Joshua Copeland all I'll say is that an argument could be made that its design and size could be construed in violation of regulation.
(10)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen C.
LTC Stephen C.
11 y
SSG(P) (Join to see), I'll echo what SGT (Join to see)'s saying, "You may win the battle, but lose the war!"
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT Journeyman Plumber
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
SSG(P) (Join to see), what this really comes down to is the question of are you willing to put this ring above your career on your priority list?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Journeyman Plumber
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
SSG Nathan Stryker, no I wouldn't approach anyone about a class ring, but I stand by what I've said. Namely that "an argument could be made." I personally wouldn't care if one of my soldiers wore the exact ring that SPC Voye is in hot water over, but his SSG clearly does and that's all that matters as it's up to his discretion.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Processing Nco
9
9
0
It says you're a 12B. I'd ditch the ring for safety reasons. You are right, look at mason rings, recruiting rings, and west point rings. I've battled a lot of leaders in my career because I knew I was right. Cite the reg, with paragraph and line if you feel you need to prove a point. At the end of the day though, rings are a hazard in our line of work. Be smart, not stubborn.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SSG Platoon Sergeant
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
In addition make sure you are without a doubt using the most current regulation. Regulations change often, either with changes added or ommited
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Network Architect
8
8
0
I'm not a big jewelry guy. I don't wear necklaces even off duty, because that's not me. Having said that, this particular ring is a LOT less flashy than some of the West Point bling I've seen on some officers... I don't know why everyone's saying this ring isn't conservative.

Having said that, this isn't the hill you want to die on. Take your SSG's actions as how NOT to be as a leader, take the ring off when off duty, and wear it all the time when off. Seriously. It's not a wedding ring, therefore it's not worth fighting over, even if you're right.

I mean, I even remove my wedding ring when I know I'm going to have my hands in the guts of a computer. A 14 year old me was working in the guts of one of the first IBM PCs (yeah, I'm old, shut up), and left the PC itself plugged in. I touched something I shouldn't have, and it blew my ass halfway across the room. That day I learned a very healthy respect for electricity. Imagine the outcome if I'd had a ring on at that time.

There are only three times I'd ever fight this battle:

1. If someone objected to my class ring, as a lot of West Point bling is a LOT more flashy. My class ring is from the University of Maryland University College, and has an emerald in the center (my birthstone). It's gold, and I got it when I graduated in 2001 with a Master's of Software Engineering. I wear it on the ring finger of my right hand.

2. If someone objected to my Masonic ring. It is very conservative. It's a dark grey, with the square and compass etched into it. My wife gave it to me as an anniversary present. I wear it when I don't wear the class ring.

3. If someone objected to my wedding ring. It's a plain gold band.

If I'm working with machinery or have my hands in the guts of a computer, the rings come off and go in a secure pocket.

If I'm in formation, all but the wedding ring would come off.

If neither of those situations are happening, but I have a senior leader demanding I remove rings, I would ask what the issue is, and point out that I'm entirely within regs. If the leader continued to be insistent, I would remove the class (or Masonic) ring and put it in a pocket, and just put it back on when that senior leader was out of the area. Why poke the bear?

Now, because of what my wedding ring represents, absent any safety issues, THAT is a hill that I am willing to die on. In my twelve and a half years of active duty and thirteen years of Reserve duty, I've only had ONE senior leader demand I remove my wedding ring.......that was a demand for uniformity, and when I pointed out that he wasn't requiring this of anyone else in the platoon, and other platoons did not enforce this...he quickly backed down. Plus, a well placed "Excuse me, Sergeant, but are you ordering me to compromise my integrity by pretending not to be married? I don't want to misunderstand your orders, so I execute them properly" works wonders.....
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Jeff Gurchinoff
5
5
0
What purpose does the ring serve? If you are wearing it just because your interpretation of AR 670-1 says you can and it has no other significance you are certainly not doing yourself any favors- from a safety standpoint or a career standpoint. You may actually need your leadership someday... best to stay in their good graces. I knew a SGM with half a ring finger because his wedding ring took it off. I've known MANY soldiers that for no good reason had an overwhelming desire to push the buttons of their leadership. You have all the free time in the world to wear that ring while out of uniform, if it has no significance I would drop the issue before you escalate your troubles any further. It may be an "Army of One" but you still have to work as a team.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Signal Support Systems Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
Havent we discussed at length enforcing policy NOT petpeeves.
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Workcenter Supervisor
PO2 (Join to see)
11 y
I am not in the Army but, I have served in Afghanistan with PRT Khost and I feel that you should only need to take off your ring when needed for safety, and if the person really wants the ring close to there hart they should be able to where it on there dog tags. I personally believe wearing a ring is a symbol of love to your spouse, when times get tough. For those people just wearing a ring because they can, well they can risk there finger for no good reason...lol
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
LTC Jason Mackay
11 y
Growing up in DS Maintenance I put my wedding ring on a d ring in my pocket with my car keys.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Jeff Gurchinoff
SFC Jeff Gurchinoff
11 y
I spent a bunch of time in your outfit Sir... a few years in the 43rd S4 and a good bit of time in Trey Deuce. I wasn't eager to try welding with my ring or crushing a finger either lol
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Adam Jennings
4
4
0
Look, being a Marine I don't know how Army Regulations are written. But every Marine Corps Order, same as your regulations, I've ever seen ends with at the discretion of the command. In other words, they can make the order more restrictive but never less restrictive. The order is the bare minimum. So, just like the Army we have jewelry regulations as well. If you wear a ring it has to be on your ring finger, one on each hand. If the command sees fit to restrict that order further to keep good order then they can.

Remember, this is from a Marine POV, so that's how our orders/regulations are written. Are AR's written to allow the command to tighten up regulations at their discretion as well? If so, you have no ground to stand on if it's a command policy. Just a thought.
(4)
Comment
(0)
2ndLt Infantry Unit Leader
2ndLt (Join to see)
9 y
Great response but with that being said.......it is exactly that....at the Commands discretion, not the SSG's. It is the ultimate decision of the Commander. I would advise speaking with someone within the Command element such as his 1SG IOT enable him to make a better decision and maybe gain facts that he might have missed when reading the regs.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Cannon Crew Member
4
4
0
As a spc. Myself I would listen to your ssgt. There could be other reasons such as the mos. You are in could be a chance of injury if something happens
You have to look at the broader picture of regs.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Richard H.
4
4
0
I would suggest just going with what's most important to you. If it's the ring, then go down fighting. If it's your standing with your CoC, then maybe consider just wearing the ring when out of uniform.

Honestly, If you want to make an issue of it, he could probably make the argument that wearing a ring on your index finger is faddish, since rings are traditionally worn on the "ring finger".
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close