Posted on Nov 9, 2015
SSG Audwin Scott
9.92K
42
14
4
4
0
Joint Forces
Posted in these groups: 58a67d25 Joint Service
Avatar feed
Responses: 11
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
9
9
0
This creates a great environment SSG Audwin Scott, especially for training! The ability to train together and to really understand the language, customs and the way of doing business in another branch of service could be a life saving skill while deployed. There could be personalities to work past/thru but overall, this is a win-win situation.
(9)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Stephen King
8
8
0
SSG Audwin Scott it is a great idea and I am for the concept. Joint forces and sharing knowledge with all branches will help with the growth of our Military as a whole.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO David Lockwood
6
6
0
I think it would be a good thing. More resources to pull from!
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
What are your thoughts on having different Branches of the military serve on the same post?
SGT Writer
5
5
0
It would remind Service Members that and further encourage them to understand more about the other branches. All Service Members, especially Leaders, should know other Leaders' ranks.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Field Radio Operator
Sgt (Join to see)
10 y
Rank structure of the other branches is taught in Boot Camp, but easily forgotten.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
10 y
I wasn't taught the ranks of other branches at any point during my TIS. I had to take initiative to learn it on my own. Luckily, I understood it before I deployed and worked with Marine and Navy personnel.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Motor Transport Operator
4
4
0
good and bad, it depends on which branches we are talking.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Professor Of Military Science / Department Chair
2
2
0
To me - It makes total sense. Arguably, it saves money in the long term by having a large single base, vs various bases for the various branches within the same immediate area. It also opens up the potential of more collaborated/joint training as well.

I think all in all - Joint Service Bases are the way to go when feasible.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Field Radio Operator
2
2
0
It is an excellent idea, and can only help when during conflicts, there is a need for close coordination between the branches.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SP5 Joel O'Brien
SP5 Joel O'Brien
10 y
I agree! My assignment with AFN Europe was j/s with members of the 7122nd Broadcasting Sq of the Air Force. I also recall seeing a group from the Coast Guard at Ft. Huachuca in 1972.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Team Leader
1
1
0
I know that cross training helps everyone paint a bigger picture. I think it would get rid of the stigmas between branches and make us have more comrades who will have esprit de corps with more than one color of uniform.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Joel O'Brien
0
0
0
I don't see any problem. I was joint service with Air Force types. Heck, my roomie was a zoomie!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM
0
0
0
A few thoughts:
- US joint doctrine says that the US military will fight joint combined arms operations.
- US Army doctrine nests with and supports US joint doctrine.
- We inhibit our ability within the operational training domain to fight joint combined arms if we do not train and educate joint combined arms within the institutional training domain.
- Therefore having different branches of the military serve on the same post is a natural implementation of our US joint doctrine. The only argument not to have different branches of the military serve on the same post would be if we are willing to change our National Security Strategy and our joint doctrine such that the US will not fight in a joint combined arms manner.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close