Posted on May 10, 2017
What do you think is lacking in the Basic Training/ AIT process?
28.7K
92
51
6
6
0
I joined a little over five years ago, ever since I graduated my IET I keep hearing from senior leaders that soldiers arriving to the unit are less prepared/ trained upon competion of IET. What aspects of Basic Training do you personally think are no longer being taught or are no longer being enforced to the same standard as say 10-20 years ago? Idealy how could the system be fixed?
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 23
Your always going to hear that point of view because generally earlier graduates want you to believe they had it tougher. I went through in 1982 back when the Drill Instructors still beat on the recruits, I remember low crawling under barbed wire while the Drill Instructors threw Artillery Blast Simulators at the slower recruits (fairly cruel and that would never be tolerated today). Having said all that and looking at the full Infantry OSUT course. Today's graduates have it tougher and more challenging because even though they eliminated some of the abuse........Ft. Benning was careful to replace it with more challenging training that was more relavent. Such as the administer IV to fellow soldiers part, the combative training (which unlike hand to hand is much more physically exhausting), all the hours we spent on Drill and Ceremony also trashed in favor of rubber shoot rooms. So Infantry OSUT is more physical today than it was when I went through and more relavent to a combat environment.........I would probably go a little farther and say it requires more physical fitness than in my day as well (1982).
(10)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
I agree. At least in the Combat Arms side of things, they got rid of the stupid abuse and added tough and more realistic training. You don't have to hit someone to smoke them. Tough incremental and realistic training makes better soldiers than abusing them ever produced.
(3)
(0)
How we just start with the minimum standard for the APFT upon graduation. Achieving that minimum standard requires several of the factors discussed already, discipline to work out and get more physical, heart, to continue regardless, and a multitude of other combinations and factors. I am not going to say that the PT was harder, but the Drills obviously had more fear power back in the day to "pump you up" to get you going. Knowing the rigors of the Army, before going to basic I started training as I was really out of shape going in at 222 pounds. I left basic 167 and a fighting machine. Not sure that is the result these days. maybe its the focus and direction of the Army or the inclusive idea that everyone is made for the Army. We all know that is not true. .02
(8)
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
Basic training graduates don't even have to meet the 60% minimum threshold for the APFT. They can graduate with a 50% score in every event. Think about that for a minute. The minimum standard isn't the standard anymore where basic trainees and physical fitness, as tested by the Army, are concerned.
(2)
(0)
#1 thing I feel is lacking is pride. Without pride, discipline suffers. It snowballs from there. The new generations don't have a personal sense of pride to the degree of those before. They are becoming more reliant upon outside recognition for even the smallest thing/task done. They crave recognition for doing things that are expected which in turn, cheapens the recognition for things done beyond what's expected.
How to fix this? In my opinion, stop rewarding mediocrity. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
How to fix this? In my opinion, stop rewarding mediocrity. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
(7)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
You are absolutely right, look at the awards given for doing nothing. We give AAM's for Soldiers who get 90 points in each event. When I was growing up in the Army 90 points in each event was something you thrived for because it would get you NCO off your back (A little bit). I remember the term 50 meter Soldier and 300 meter Soldier.
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
Agreed! Pride is something that must be focal point! A Mediocre performance should never rewarded regardless. However, addressing this issue has to start elsewhere. We must give them the knowledge of what they should even be proud of in the first place. Teach them our history. What we have learned throughout our battles and what we can do better! There is so much down time at basic that can be taken advantage of. This is where it should start. Quit giving out koodos to those who barely meet the standard and explain why exceeding them helps propel greatness in the carrying on of the traditions and values of the Army in general.
(0)
(0)
SSG Stephan Pendarvis
You are spot on SSG! They don't see the task but the reward to feed their ego. That is why I always have hated medals and ribbons. I call them "false motivations". While it is good to recognized...we cannot forget that there is a mission. I wonder if they stopped giving ribbons would service members stop performing to their best to get a mission accomplished? The mission is always first....whether praise is given or not.
(0)
(0)
Almost all of our new guys, right out of AIT, have been saying that APFTs in both BCT and AIT get pencil-whipped if the Soldier cannot pass a PT Test. The training staff no longer want to hold Soldiers back and retrain them. They just send them to their first assignment, where they have to get "fixed."
(5)
(0)
PFC Bradley Campbell
the military needs to ditch the fitness program completely and look to college and pro sports in hockey, football ,lacrosse and soccer, and wrestling and build up from there. take all the company PT and all of that and burn it to the ground.less rank, more mentoring. less rank, more nutrition.less kicking people out, and more circuit training and cycling every day. do any military bases even have any skateparks? laugh if you will...Tony Hawk is near 50 and i bet he is in better shape that 98 percent of the force. and he plays on a skateboard for fun and career.
(1)
(0)
SSG Stephan Pendarvis
Because it looks bad for the training staff...and lord knows they do not want to come under fire for not doing their job correctly. Sometimes it is not even about lack of motivation or whatever....if the training staff passes these soldiers when they should be held back. We are talking about man power and monies to retrain soldiers again...it is better to just pass them and let them improve at their next assignment (pass on dirty baggage). It is not right...but that is the easier way it seems....there seems to be no good answer. In a perfect world....I actually cannot picture what this would even look like.
(0)
(0)
Well from my point of view, I cannot say about combat arms, but I can tell you as a corporal I worked BCT at Knox for the regular BCT battalion, all males very high standards, as a Staff Sergeant I was cadre at Ft. Jackson again regular BCT but coed and the problems with male and female were amazing. Plus the standard had dropped by a factor of 10. Plus I have been several times to Ft. Lee which is mostly an AIT post and the standard there is very low. To me Ft. Lee AIT is almost like being in college or summer camp. I can't say about other post that have AIT or BCT.
(5)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
You'll get that exact same perspective from Infantry NCO's that cross over to support MOS companies. A buddy of mine did that after he hit MSG. I had to chuckle at his complaints because some of them just were not reality in the private sector from my perspective. My friend said over and over and over again: "I never should have left Special Forces..........I never should have left Special Forces....." (ha-ha).
(0)
(0)

Suspended Profile
This is a perpetual cycle that will always be in place. No new folks will ever be "as good and tough" as the older folks. Well, not until those new folks turn into the old folks. I am of course speaking for the AF. Id bet its the same story though. I say that because I'm currently in that realm and it is hands down more difficult than I remember when I was in their shoes.
Sense of belonging and familiarity with the history of the Army for starters! Half of the soldiers these days don't even know what they should be proud of. Who is General Patton, Audie Murphy? They don't even know the significance of previous battles, what they did, or how they did it, let alone know when the Army celebrates its birthday. It is a huge honor to be considered a U.S. Soldier a (1%er). Our history is rich, and should be engrained into the brains of our knew Soldiers! There is so much down time that can be taken advantage of throughout basic training that it's ridiculous. Maybe that sense of pride would help our newer soldiers roll their shoulders back and hold there chins a little higher. Which in turn breeds a culture that allows peers to hold each other to the standards and Army Values that have been laid out before us! Just my two cents... SSG, Army National Guard
(3)
(0)
I surely hope this photo attached to the story is that of a Drill Sergeant holding the feet of another Drill Sergeant taking the APFT, and not of a IET or AIT soldier.
(3)
(0)
I don't think the things that are missing can be taught. It takes life to do that.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next