Posted on Mar 15, 2018
What is your most radical or unpopular opinion concerning the military?
71K
1.19K
435
164
164
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 139
My most radical opinion of the military is, that 99% of officers feel that they are above many military regulations. Uniform wear especially. Even since my retirement 26 years ago, I see their disregard for the correct wearing of their uniforms is appalling and shameful. Were I on active duty today, I would not salute their violations of uniform wear. But I had to respect the rank, but not the man/woman in that uniform.
(4)
(0)
SSgt Daniel d'Errico
I have watch officers on flight crew syatus walk outdoors with their uniform jackets unzipped. This I watched from my car, while waiting for ,y wife to come out of the same building. Just before my retirement at Holloman AFB, I saw a captain sitting at the McDonalds on base, with the bars on her cap parallel to the brim of the cap. I as an NCO pointed it out to her, which she replied, "I will check the regulations on it". If you believe it wasn't my place to inform or point out their violations, you're wrong.
(0)
(0)
SGT Joseph Gunderson getting reprimanded or even kicked out for wearing your religion on your sleeve...having a bible at work, or a religious calendar or even speaking about your religion while on duty or in uniform....just really makes me mad.
(4)
(0)
LCpl Cody Collins
Amen, while a male can claim he feels like a woman, and go into a woman's bathroom to relieve him/ herself. And people actually defend this behavior.
(1)
(0)
Well ever since the 1980's I thought the retirement benefits should be portable and based on years of service with a 5 year vesting period so that someone that serves 5 years or more gets a portion of the retirement as a lump sum or annuity. Also, say someone in their thirties that wants to enlist can roll in their civliian plan that has accrued so far to the military plan, so they might not have to serve a full 20 years before retirement but what they expected to round out their past civilian work. Thats really the biggest thing making the military retirement system more interchangeable and compatible with the civilian side. Nobody else agrees with me though and folks either say impossible or it would drain people away from the military and will never happen.
(4)
(0)
CSM Charles Hayden Passed 7/29/2025
If any service member can actually understand and implement the plan. I fear the plan is an over reach for younger persons. That is why the explanatory classes are emerging!!
(0)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
I think that it will have the same issues as contributed retirements in the civilian world. Most people at 21 just don't consider that one day they will be over 60 and want to retire. All I was interested in at that age was women and beer.
(0)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
CPT Lawrence Cable - Thats true but the pension plans offer a buffer for those that do not save much in their 401(k). I can live off my 401(k) without a pension because I saved like I never would get a pension (they are pretty rare these days). However the flip side is had I never saved much in my 401(k) the pension plus SS would have been enough to live off of. So thats why I think it is a good idea to be able to retain a portion of the Army pension if you leave or seperate under 20. I also think they should boost the Medal of Honor reciepients pension. Not many of those guys and the DoD can afford to pay them more than $1k a month (which isn't much of a supplimental kick to SS). Should be closer to $3-4k a month (and indexed for inflation) if you ask me.
(1)
(0)
MSG John Duchesneau
Remember - the purpose of military retirement is the incentivize you to stay in the military - not reward you for getting out.
(0)
(0)
I found out in the late 1990s that Smedley Butler's quote still held a lot of truth. War is a racket.
In the spring of 1990 as a Marine grunt, I had a chance to help develop lesson plans for patrolling operations, infantry tactics, and weapon system training handouts and courses in Spanish for the militaries of Honduras and Guatemala.
These forces then committed atrocities against local indigenous people who could not read, let alone study and espouse Marxism, or wage a guerilla war against their governments.
What they had was land that wealthy individuals in both countries wanted for development, but the local subsistence Indian farmers were in the way.
By labelling them as communists, not only did they have a free hand in pushing them off their land, but in exterminating them as well.
Our military once stood on the principles of spreading democracy. I once believed we could and would do no wrong, that we had moral clarity on our side. Now I am more inclined to ask who is profiting when I see it deployed. Patriotism to me, is more often than not, a lie used to justify the enrichment of the few over the many. I am not saying it is dead, but patriotism should never be blind to consequences.
In the spring of 1990 as a Marine grunt, I had a chance to help develop lesson plans for patrolling operations, infantry tactics, and weapon system training handouts and courses in Spanish for the militaries of Honduras and Guatemala.
These forces then committed atrocities against local indigenous people who could not read, let alone study and espouse Marxism, or wage a guerilla war against their governments.
What they had was land that wealthy individuals in both countries wanted for development, but the local subsistence Indian farmers were in the way.
By labelling them as communists, not only did they have a free hand in pushing them off their land, but in exterminating them as well.
Our military once stood on the principles of spreading democracy. I once believed we could and would do no wrong, that we had moral clarity on our side. Now I am more inclined to ask who is profiting when I see it deployed. Patriotism to me, is more often than not, a lie used to justify the enrichment of the few over the many. I am not saying it is dead, but patriotism should never be blind to consequences.
(3)
(0)
SPC Steve ChenRobbins
"These forces then committed atrocities against local indigenous people who could not read, let alone study and espouse Marxism, or wage a guerilla war against their governments." I assume that you did your duty and brought that information (about the atrocities) up the line.
(0)
(0)
Cpl John Cogswell
Well, considering the program had ended by the time I discovered that, and the atrocities were not made clear to me until 2006 (14 years later) by a news report, long after I had EAS'd in 1992, would you think it a moot point to do so?
(0)
(0)
Cpl John Cogswell
Honestly, I wouldn't even know who to report that to. The officers I worked with at the time have all fallen out of contact.
(0)
(0)
Mine was that I joined the Marine Corps. My parents were against anyone of us kids going in because of some of my uncles' experiences in Vietnam but, I went anyways. It had nothing to do with me going in the Corps, but, that I went in any branch of the service. Later they realized it was for the best and my older brother actually went in the Air Force about a year and a half after I went in.
(3)
(0)
That everyone, either upon graduating from high school or turning 18 if not in school, has to serve a minimum of 2 years in the military branch of their choice.
(3)
(0)
SSG Craig Newton
Yes. It would teach a lot of kids a viable career opportunity as well as getting some out of bad living conditions. And it would be absolute, meaning no deferments like the draft.
(1)
(0)
(2)
(0)
Tired of hearing "hero" attached to someone who did a tour in Iraq or Afghanistan.(mainly by the news media)
(3)
(0)
That we spend entirely too much money on R&D and equipment when the soldier (sailor, airman or marine... also coastie I guess) is the most important part of the military.
(3)
(0)
SPC Chris Ison
I TOTALLY agree with this. We spend way too much money on civilian contractor's you can not tell me it is cheaper to have a civilian serving chow, and a private doing KP. Nor should the military pay a former soldier who was just a specialist twice his salary now that Sikorsky has hired him as a "tech rep".
all of the recent defense spending has gone directly to contractor's and none of it has benefited the soldier on the ground.
all of the recent defense spending has gone directly to contractor's and none of it has benefited the soldier on the ground.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Military Life
Military Career
Command
Leadership
