Posted on Jan 28, 2017
Why does security now trump liberty? Is this complementary to the values of Founders?
88.8K
625
374
48
48
0
Responses: 105
IMO the secret to true security is being able to exercise your liberties freely without being afraid of retribution or in fear for your safety. For the record, I do agree with the quote wholeheartedly.
S/F
S/F
(44)
(0)
TSgt (Join to see)
That is kind of ironic consider TJ was not only a great man and a founding father. He also was a slave owner.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Frank Downs
TSgt (Join to see) - I find it ironic that the first slave owner in the colonies was a Black man, he was not referring to that kind of Slavery.
We are a Constitutional Republic the needs of the many dose not out weigh the needs of the few or the one. The trapping of personal Data is a clear violation of the 4th amendment, even a DUI checkpoint is in violation of the Constitution all done for the good of the people (NOT), the road to hell is always paved with good intentions.
We are a Constitutional Republic the needs of the many dose not out weigh the needs of the few or the one. The trapping of personal Data is a clear violation of the 4th amendment, even a DUI checkpoint is in violation of the Constitution all done for the good of the people (NOT), the road to hell is always paved with good intentions.
(0)
(0)
SGT Rosi Teresi
TSgt (Join to see) - So what. Slavery was abolished in this country, but it is still rampant in others. Most American slave owners treated their slaves well because that's where their money came from. LBJ reinstituted slavery with his "war on poverty" and enslaved many people, Black and White, to the welfare system and they are still slaves today.
(0)
(0)
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin
The world is not as simple as it was in Franklin's day but is certainly more dangerous. There are those who seek to deprive of us our Constitutional and God-given rights, both foreign and domestic. Exercise your rights and liberties but you must also be vigilant to keep your enemies at bay and your freedom in tact. The Radical Muslim Extremists who wish to destroy us and our way of life are the scourge of the earth. We must be ready to fight them on any grounds...Home or Away. I prefer an Away scenario but but if the battle must be fought at Home, then so be it! Life became more complex for us after 9/11. Stock up, rearm and be ready to fight to the death to preserve our way of life.
The world is not as simple as it was in Franklin's day but is certainly more dangerous. There are those who seek to deprive of us our Constitutional and God-given rights, both foreign and domestic. Exercise your rights and liberties but you must also be vigilant to keep your enemies at bay and your freedom in tact. The Radical Muslim Extremists who wish to destroy us and our way of life are the scourge of the earth. We must be ready to fight them on any grounds...Home or Away. I prefer an Away scenario but but if the battle must be fought at Home, then so be it! Life became more complex for us after 9/11. Stock up, rearm and be ready to fight to the death to preserve our way of life.
(34)
(0)
CPL Steve Freeman
Po3 John Wagner, I disagree. They scored some points on 9/11 but they didn't win...nor will they. My God is bigger than the beast they worship.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Alan Moran
Today is 5/10/18. Monday (maybe Sunday) Trump said that he was considering the barring of the Washington Post, (You remember, the Watergate people) because fake news may be true but it's just an alternate fact. Seems he and the NRA prefer the second ammendment to the first. Tyrany?
(0)
(0)
SSgt Jim Gilmore
Cpl Alan Moran - Having not seen any article you refer to, I will only say that the 2A is the guarantor of all the rest.
(0)
(0)
I must be missing something. Preventing people who are coming from a country where many want to kill Americans is a restriction on our freedoms?
(34)
(0)
Cpl Brad MarkW
Rooster Cogburn - Of course the people had a say in those acts. They voted in the congressmen who passed those laws and afterward, they voted them in again. When "We the People" finally decide to take our country back, let me know. Till then, "We the Sheeple" will keep blindly voting for the same type of politicians who gave us the Patriot Act, etc. And for that, we are neither safer, nor freer.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Alex Hernandez
Once you have chosen to surrender your freedoms for security, the bad guys have already won
(0)
(0)
SGT Rosi Teresi
SPC Nate Reynolds - They can feel all over a 4 yr old girl, but a burka is hands off. TSA is bullshit.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Alan Moran
Capt (Join to see) - Humor me. go read "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William L. Shirer. Pick on "the Other" (both foreign and domestic), warn of threats that only they can handle, move closer to the people who donate to keep you in power (it's symbiotic), make your enemies your new friends (Russia- Germany), take over all media, tell of the lies that are told about you. The book is a 'how to' book for those who want to diminish the rule of law. Hitler and Goebels did not encourage gun ownership.
(0)
(0)
I wish to share the following with this discussion group. This is what the balance is all about:
"We live in dangerous times, but we are not the first generation of Americans to face threats to our security. Like those before us, we will be judged by future generations of Americans on how we react to crisis. And by that I mean not just whether we win the war on terrorism, because I believe we will, but also whether, as we fight that war, we safeguard for our citizens the very liberties for which we are fighting."
- Robert Mueller, Fmr Dir, FBI
"We live in dangerous times, but we are not the first generation of Americans to face threats to our security. Like those before us, we will be judged by future generations of Americans on how we react to crisis. And by that I mean not just whether we win the war on terrorism, because I believe we will, but also whether, as we fight that war, we safeguard for our citizens the very liberties for which we are fighting."
- Robert Mueller, Fmr Dir, FBI
(32)
(0)
SFC James Asbill
We have a new generation .. who it seems only concern is feelings and safety .. Not freedom .. and most certainly not willing to make any ind of real sacrifice to preserve it ..
(5)
(0)
SPC Randy Torgerson
SFC James Asbill - Amen brother.... it is this new generation, but they are being trained by some extremists on the left.....
(1)
(0)
SFC James Asbill
SP5 Christine Conley - Do you really think that deserves a response .. because if you do then it means slaves and prisoners have freedom if they feel safe .. you know .. like in solitary confinement .......
(0)
(0)
CPO David Ransom
Notice that Meuller said "we safeguard for our citizens". He did not include people of other countries.
(0)
(0)
These "refugees" have no Constitutional Right to enter the Country. The primary job of the President is to protect the Country, not to care for people from other countries. Allowing Terrorists to come into the country is not protecting the country.
(25)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Trump did try to stop refugee immigration initiated by UN but California Court judge apposed it.
SPC Randy Torgerson
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - That argument is mis-leading on face value. Nearly all of the "home grown" may have been citizens but most are first or 2nd generation citizens. Radicalized by their own family members who came from many of the bad countries.
Don't disguise your argument with the way you made your point. Yes, they mostly may have been US citizens but their parents / other family members are not.
Don't disguise your argument with the way you made your point. Yes, they mostly may have been US citizens but their parents / other family members are not.
(3)
(0)
PO3 John Wagner
SPC Randy Torgerson - Thank you. I despise those who manipulate statistics to "proclaim" the legitimacy of their argument. That's OK when it isn't a matter of national security.. in business for example, that's just the way things are done.
National Security is the responsibility of our leaders... Not something which is a malleable commodity to be enforced only when they see fit.
National Security is the responsibility of our leaders... Not something which is a malleable commodity to be enforced only when they see fit.
(0)
(0)
(2)
(0)
It all started in an airport when I met my first TSA agent. Five minutes later, I was down to my ACU pants and socks. I knew it was over. We went from liberty to security to tyranny in five minutes. I've been sad ever since.
(22)
(0)
PO3 John Wagner
PO2 Rev. Frederick C. Mullis, AFI, CFM - It isn't easy to do. I know. Sometimes raising a little hell is the only way to get any attention focused on stupidity.
I understand you were wise enough to have assessed the situation beforehand.... but that is when it is the most fun right? Sometimes a caustic and denigrating comment about the performance of civil servants in the right ear pays offf... more often than not in fact. My hometown PD, who were used by lying SJW's to abuse and harass me endlessly before it was found out.. now give me a very wide berth. One of them tried to passively harass me... calling my house at midnight to tell me I had left the dome light on in my pickup. I wrote an email to the chief and a city councilman I know. Told them that their night watchmen weren't worth a fart in a windstorm... I will leave out the details.. but two day later there was an article in the local paper..
"Police chief announces increased pesonell and changes in watch patterns during night patrols." I know my business and I know theirs. Small satisfaction and I could laugh but once again keeping it short... When I let loose in the most uncertain terms about deficiencies in law enforcement in our community they seem to take action.. They know I have them assessed and they know they are wanting..
Small compensation for abuse and financial damages. I respect law enforcement totally.
They must meet the standards to deserve that respect, and mine are very high.
I come from a family with law enforcement background... I was raised by a federal law enforcement agent and know how to cut right to the core with my assessments.
(I still hate those dumb sons of b*****s) Punks for letting themselves be used. Just punks.
I understand you were wise enough to have assessed the situation beforehand.... but that is when it is the most fun right? Sometimes a caustic and denigrating comment about the performance of civil servants in the right ear pays offf... more often than not in fact. My hometown PD, who were used by lying SJW's to abuse and harass me endlessly before it was found out.. now give me a very wide berth. One of them tried to passively harass me... calling my house at midnight to tell me I had left the dome light on in my pickup. I wrote an email to the chief and a city councilman I know. Told them that their night watchmen weren't worth a fart in a windstorm... I will leave out the details.. but two day later there was an article in the local paper..
"Police chief announces increased pesonell and changes in watch patterns during night patrols." I know my business and I know theirs. Small satisfaction and I could laugh but once again keeping it short... When I let loose in the most uncertain terms about deficiencies in law enforcement in our community they seem to take action.. They know I have them assessed and they know they are wanting..
Small compensation for abuse and financial damages. I respect law enforcement totally.
They must meet the standards to deserve that respect, and mine are very high.
I come from a family with law enforcement background... I was raised by a federal law enforcement agent and know how to cut right to the core with my assessments.
(I still hate those dumb sons of b*****s) Punks for letting themselves be used. Just punks.
(1)
(0)
SSgt Wright Joe
PO3 Kason M. Your so called safety screenings have failed more often than they have succeeded. Fortunately for you the failures were drills. So what good are they other than allowing you to think you're safer?
(1)
(0)
PO3 Garry Reed
It kills me that the private security firms used before 9/11 were cheaper. Yet we just hired those same people pay them more and get less out of them. As someone else said its all just smoke and mirrors.
(0)
(0)
Here's what Jefferson had to say about Islam after he and John Adams met with the Ambassador of Tripoli in an unsuccessful attempt to end the Barbary piracy peacefully:
“We took the liberty to make some enquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
The Ambassador [of Tripoli] answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.
{Letter from the commissioners, John Adams & Thomas Jefferson, to John Jay, 28 March 1786}”
― Thomas Jefferson, Letters of Thomas Jefferson
That, my friends, is mainstream Islam, not radical Islam.
“We took the liberty to make some enquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
The Ambassador [of Tripoli] answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.
{Letter from the commissioners, John Adams & Thomas Jefferson, to John Jay, 28 March 1786}”
― Thomas Jefferson, Letters of Thomas Jefferson
That, my friends, is mainstream Islam, not radical Islam.
(14)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Explain why the UN is wanting to force countries to take in refugees? Explain why UN is against Israel. Why did Oboma and Hillary want to allow more Muslim refugees into our country? Why is a supreme court judge in California opposing Trumps immigration from known terrorist countries? Why are so many liberals againts Trump wanting to protect our boarders and be more selective of who is allowed in? As far as there being a change in Muslim beliefs unless there book has been rewritten there is no change. What are the religious beliefs of those within UN? There are those that believe all this Muslim refugee immigration is as a Trojan horse. Now my question is what do we do? Sit around and wait to see what happens? Not a good solution. Get rid of those opposing Trump? A lot of political maneuvering and we will have to wait till midterm elections. I do agree something needs to be done.
PO2 Skip Kirkwood
AN Donald Miller - Explain why any nation pays a lick of attention to the UN? It is nothing but a corrupt body of dictators, thugs, and anti-American diplomats sponging off the US government!
(3)
(0)
Suspended Profile
I actually believe it's even worse than that. Why we are even a member I'll never know. But like the bible says you can tell a tree by the fruit it bears. Seems UN is wanting every nation to have their chunk of Muslim refugees which will lrad to nothing but them wanting to do what they intend to do. The bible also speaks of seven attempts at a one world government or order, their have been 6 we are now in the staging of the seventh yet last attempt. Seems to be a collation.
Suspended Profile
Here is a link everyone may find interesting it seems to be a current trend and not just the one cityhttp://powderedwigsociety.com/utica/
I think safety and security are often an illusion sold to people to make them believe they are better off with the "security" measures created for them. I don't know where the quote came from, but the one that I often remember is: "That which keeps you safe can also keep you prisoner". Do we live in dangerous times. Sure we do. But when has there been a time in history that wasn't dangerous? A time when people were not trying to assert their power, take lands for themselves, conquer a civilization?
Keep in mind, the more "security" we have, the more the average person expects "someone else" to keep them safe. And the more they rely on that someone else, the more they give them the power to give or take that security as they wish.
I'm not saying we should not rely on each other, and I'm not saying we shouldn't have a police force, but expecting someone else to take care of your personal security is not really what our founding fathers had in mind. They understood that we have to help each other and they understand there has to be police who maintain law and order, but we also have to help ourselves, and we cannot expect someone else to do the dirty work for us if we are unwilling (unable is a completely different story) to do it for ourselves.
I do like this quote: "If you want total security, go to prison. There you're fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking... is freedom." - Dwight D. Eisenhower. Yup, that just about sums it up.
Safety and Security can be seen as an illusion we like to believe. It make us feel secure. I feel safe in my home. But I also know, there are a million things that could happen in my home that could cause me harm. I feel basically safe when I go outside of my home or community, but I also know that every time I go outside my home, there are risks. That is called life. So I can accept the risks, take certain precautions and see them as a possible adventure, or I can sit at home like a scared chicken and hope someone is out there to protect me. Hmmmm...the latter is not my style.
OK, I know this is getting long, but I have to relay this story. So, I get a telemarketer call from ADT. And after telling them "No" several times, that I'm not interested in their security system, and the guy really not wanting to take "no" for an answer, I'm getting irritated. So the guy is trying to play out reasons why I should get the security system and he says, "What if someone breaks into your house and tries to hurt you? If you had our security system, it would call the police to come help you." I laughed and said, "Sir, if some poor fool tries to break into my home and hurt me, I own a 9mm, and I will be more than happy to shoot them." He got silent for a minute and tried the "Yah, but..." I shut him down and explained there was no "Yah, buts.." in this scenario. My point is simple. I am not going to rely on a security system or anything else to protect me, especially if I am not willing to make an effort to protect myself.
Yes, I am a Soldier for Life, and as a Soldier, I will never expect someone else to defend me or protect me. If I'm unwilling to protect myself, then I don't think I really deserve the freedoms I spent most of my life defending. And quite frankly, I happen to like my freedoms.
Keep in mind, the more "security" we have, the more the average person expects "someone else" to keep them safe. And the more they rely on that someone else, the more they give them the power to give or take that security as they wish.
I'm not saying we should not rely on each other, and I'm not saying we shouldn't have a police force, but expecting someone else to take care of your personal security is not really what our founding fathers had in mind. They understood that we have to help each other and they understand there has to be police who maintain law and order, but we also have to help ourselves, and we cannot expect someone else to do the dirty work for us if we are unwilling (unable is a completely different story) to do it for ourselves.
I do like this quote: "If you want total security, go to prison. There you're fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking... is freedom." - Dwight D. Eisenhower. Yup, that just about sums it up.
Safety and Security can be seen as an illusion we like to believe. It make us feel secure. I feel safe in my home. But I also know, there are a million things that could happen in my home that could cause me harm. I feel basically safe when I go outside of my home or community, but I also know that every time I go outside my home, there are risks. That is called life. So I can accept the risks, take certain precautions and see them as a possible adventure, or I can sit at home like a scared chicken and hope someone is out there to protect me. Hmmmm...the latter is not my style.
OK, I know this is getting long, but I have to relay this story. So, I get a telemarketer call from ADT. And after telling them "No" several times, that I'm not interested in their security system, and the guy really not wanting to take "no" for an answer, I'm getting irritated. So the guy is trying to play out reasons why I should get the security system and he says, "What if someone breaks into your house and tries to hurt you? If you had our security system, it would call the police to come help you." I laughed and said, "Sir, if some poor fool tries to break into my home and hurt me, I own a 9mm, and I will be more than happy to shoot them." He got silent for a minute and tried the "Yah, but..." I shut him down and explained there was no "Yah, buts.." in this scenario. My point is simple. I am not going to rely on a security system or anything else to protect me, especially if I am not willing to make an effort to protect myself.
Yes, I am a Soldier for Life, and as a Soldier, I will never expect someone else to defend me or protect me. If I'm unwilling to protect myself, then I don't think I really deserve the freedoms I spent most of my life defending. And quite frankly, I happen to like my freedoms.
(9)
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
The illusion of safety is easier to sell to a lazy populace than requiring them to take responsibility for themselves....
(1)
(0)
Benjamin Franklin said: Those who sacrifice Liberty for security deserve neither. I agree.
(7)
(0)
Several operators died yesterday in a raid in Yemen against Al Qaeda. They were pursuing a continued environment of dangerous freedom. Their actions were designed to avoid an eventual peaceful slavery. Volunteer for Combat Arms, put the uniform back on your old body, sweat and train with some Soldiers or Marines. Get on a helicopter that will come back with a bloody deck or not at all. Quit being so spoiled and arrogant off the sweat of others, and please tell me again how our freedom revolves around the immediate entrance of foreign immigrants from countries we are fighting against without intense scrutiny. The argument is a real hoot to listen to.
(7)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
1SG Al Brown - Insubordination - defiance of authority; refusal to obey orders. Disagreement, or the writing of disagreement, is not insubordination by the accepted definition.
SFC Anthony Rudeen Did I say "ban on Muslims" somewhere? My failure to reply was because I didn't see the comments. Is one terrorist death too many that we must spend billions to fix the problem? Well, that is one way of looking at it. However, how come we don't look at all problems with that same point of view? How many people are killed by accidental or negligent firearms discharges every year? How come we don't spend these billions to train and educate people on how to use the firearms they purchase is "one is too many"?
PO3 John Wagner "V" means Veteran, right? Anyone who served honorably is really a Veteran, right? The 1SG made it to 1SG, so we probably have about the same time in service.
SFC Anthony Rudeen Did I say "ban on Muslims" somewhere? My failure to reply was because I didn't see the comments. Is one terrorist death too many that we must spend billions to fix the problem? Well, that is one way of looking at it. However, how come we don't look at all problems with that same point of view? How many people are killed by accidental or negligent firearms discharges every year? How come we don't spend these billions to train and educate people on how to use the firearms they purchase is "one is too many"?
PO3 John Wagner "V" means Veteran, right? Anyone who served honorably is really a Veteran, right? The 1SG made it to 1SG, so we probably have about the same time in service.
(2)
(0)
SSG Jeffrey Monk
I guess I must be a radical then. I don't feel anyone should be allowed into the US who doesn't have a strong vetting process. An Arab should never get into the country quicker than it did for my Peruvian Wife, Filipno Sister in law or Maylasian adopted sister. But the government has without a doubt over stepped its bounds when it comes to citizens. As military we know and except that we are going to be watched and treated differently but once my code went from Active to Retired does not mean my conversations should be recorded by anyone. As far as how many Americans should die to keep us safe? Try answering that when Americans are killed when a plane is shot down. Its in the 2nd version of the Patriot Act, just is it is for the detainment of American Citizens without the ability to retain representation. The ability to call something extremist now is a lot easier. Could my membership in a Militia group someday fall under extremist activity or how about my ammo and weapons. To Democrats those are considered extremist and in some states my 30rd mags are illegal to own. Yes, I have a problem with a government over stepping its ability to rule due to fear.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next


Security
Freedom
Values
