Why does the Army appear to have a discipline issue with the lower enlisted ranks?

Its called poor leadership.

I think something that the Army is missing is Army history. Soldiers don't know WHY they should be proud of the the service they chose to serve in. I served in the Navy Sea Cadets as a kid before joining and medically retiring from the Army. While we were just kids in the Sea Cadets, we were expected to intimately know Navy history and why we should be proud of the Navy. I got ZERO Army history in basic training in 1994. I know nothing about the Army such as when it was officially founded or great events in the past or anything at all for that matter. I was infinitely more proud of the Navy as a Sea Cadet than I was of the Army as an actual soldier. Don't get me wrong, I am proud to have served and I believe that the Army has many redeeming qualities, but it's just not taught. Ask any Marine the birthday of the Marines, ask any sailor for a quote from a famous sailor or tide turning battle, (sorry I don't know anything comparable for the Air Force), and you get the answer you're looking for. Ask a soldier something from Army history and you get crickets--*chirp chirp*. The Army needs to spend quality time in basic training teaching the soldiers Army history and Army pride. Along with that, those who can't grasp that concept simply need to be kicked to the curb.

I had a gunnie explain it to me this way.in the army before you go into combat.you get a hot meal.2 beers 8 hour sleep.I'm the marine corps they shit on bread give it to you.then you go into combat

I saw this issue beginning at my last assignment before I retired. I followed it as my stepson did his time,(medically retired) and have watched in the news and Army sites over the years. One reason was the "DEATH" of the truly professional NCO Corps. It became everyone was worthy of promotion whether they actually were or not and a lot of those sergeants had no loyalty to the military or their own soldiers/leaders. I've read stories of sergeants who could not zero or qualify with their individually assigned weapons let alone have no MOS proficiency. The bottom line is that politics and a undetermined time at war has seriously undermined the discipline and respect I not only taught my soldiers and those around us but gave way completely to individual pride instead of Esprit de Corps. Sadly I wonder what it will take before our senior leaders tell their civilian counterparts that yes right are important for all servicemembers but not at the cost of professionalism and discipline. Judt take a look at the news, suicides, murders and defections are the norm now. In all of my 20 years of service I never thought this would happen.

The last administration deliberately sought to undermine US combat prestige, Pastel uniforms for target designation...we still won, ROEs requiring the enemy to close before engagements we still won... Introduction to sensitivity training and integration of the sexes in all combat arms, they'll bury a lot in China. with the watered down training and standards .I wonder if they even PMCS on vehicles anymore ...because it's TOO heavy and uncomfortable.

When I was at AIT the Army's primary schoolschooling. Some soldiers to be high schoolish.
Now you can drink all the beer you can drink.
But I also saw the First Sgt stand before the Company and preach to us about the wrongs of drinking then get drunk as a skunk at a Company's party. Then go to church and preach to the soldiers about the sins of drinking. He also jumps on soldiers for getting too drunk.
So young soldiers and older soldiers will get drunk and make a fool out of themselves.
I've learned that no matter at what age soldiers will get drunk.
In Germany on a Mountain Top, the young soldiers would get drunk because they could. One soldier almost died because of alcohol poisoning. I had to take her to a German Hospital for treatment.
I learned that if I was going to drink it would be in my home. But never again would i get drunk.

CPT

Everything start back in 1987
When I was a Drill Sergeant a team of doctor visit my unit and interviewed all the Drill Sergeant asking what was the motive for us to implement harsh discipline on new recruits. All of us give our reasons of why discipline implemented in the early stage will mold a soldier to follow orders without hesitation. About couple months later the Army implement new rules such as soldier can’t be doing PT before 6:00am and so on
Now years later good leaders has to put out with indiscipline soldiers

Having served in the Marine Corps and the Army, there is a dramatically different approach to discipline. In the Corps, there is little interaction between enlisted and NCO's. The junior enlisted know little about their NCO's which works well when orders are given and executed. The Army, on the other hand, allows some fraternization in the ranks between NCOs and enlisted. It makes for a more relaxed atmosphere. At the end of the day, orders are given, received, and executed.
In addition, I've found Army soldiers have their MOS down cold and are much better at their field skills than Marines.

Is it true the Army has a "Time Out Card"?

I've seen the discipline of soldiers decline with each generation. When spanking in schools were taken away the discipline also declined.
In the late 70's the government was trying to pass that children can turn parents in for spanking them. This is when parents didn't know how to discipline their children, didn't want to get reported especially by their children.
As 21st century comes along, discipline is out the window. Some soldiers are disciplined while others just don't care.
And the Military has both types in their ranks.

Captain Michael Wilford, my name is James R. Green retired SSG, U. S. Army. I served as a grunt in the 3rd Battalion of the 33rd infantry Division for six years. I took a 20 year break in service and re enlisted in 1974 into the Corp. of Engineers. Six months later I transferred into the Military Police and retired in 1992 after 33 years of service. The probable reason for lack of discipline may be because of the current trend of the social unrest. I guess we have a bad crop of young people these days.

Maybe because "enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly and bear considerable watching!" I proved that repeatedly when I was in the Army.

I originally wanted to join the Air Force to become a fixed wing pilot but after my first semester of college the Army offered me an opportunity to become a Warrant Officer to fly helicopters. I was temporarily stationed on an Air Force Base and I personally compared of how the air personnel volunteered compared to the Army that at times drafted civilians, had higher criminal offenses accepted, assigned the Reserves and have more soldiers who a judge may have given one a choice or other poorer parental upbringing as compared to the air personnel. In other words I have found more Army soldiers who may choose or may not choose the Infantry, artillery etc. and do not like the authority being at the bottom as compared to the Air personnel who have more skilled schooling.

NCOs treat lower enlisted like they are friends, and are too afraid to hold people accountable. I feel this is the root cause of the problem.

yes apparently it is a generational thing. Even though as an NCO who was medicaled out back in 2006. I had soldiers who thought they could disrespect me. But I got point across to them. Its sad when a lower ranking NCO had more respect for me, than those of higher rank in the chain of concern. Sadly today I have witnessed the disrespect happen in front of me. I've even taken the soldier aside and whispered if they didn't get there shit together, I would be back to unpack their duffle. And if I ever witnessed it happening again, they would wish their mommy's were there. And then addressed the young NCO he had failed the NCO Creed and had best unpack his head from his duffle bag.

Just to offer a perspective, in 1973 I arrived at Fort Hood Texas, a brand new 2lt, 22 years old with the fate of the free world on my shoulders. In my first assignment, I had several senior NCO's with nearly 30 years experience including WWII, Korea, and Vietnam. We did a command post exercise using the battle of the bulge scenario. Pop (SFC) Lee came and gave a talk to the command group about driving an ambulance between Bastonge and St. Vith through the course of the battle, even when both were virtually or actually surrounded. In the Corps G2 section we had a Master Sergeant that was 13 years old, living in Hiroshima the day the bomb fell. He had been caught in Japan visiting Grandparents when the war broke out. All this was a Corps level. I learned a lot from those senior NCOs. Then I got my first assignment to a Division, to command a platoon in the Combat Intelligence Company. The outgoing PSG was a SSG. He was schedule do retire in a couple of days as an 05. He had been RIF as the war drew down and assumed his permanent rank though he kept being promoted for time in service through AUS. The regular Army/AUS/Reserves was a mess. His replacement was a PFC who had been an acting Corporal and who was on the list to become an E4 (specialist) we made him an acting jack SGT E5. At 22, I literally was the oldest guy in the platoon. We would occasionally have senior NCOs float through, most on their was to retirement. Then I got assigned to a Cavalry Squadron. My G2 NCO told stories of how 2lt Patton would line them up and talk to them about the strategic situation while on his first assignment in Germany just after WWII. He also related stories about his tank being swarmed with Chinese soldiers in Korea, they would scratch at the lenses to the periscopes, couldn't figure out how they could see the Americans inside the tank but couldn't touch them. The Cavalry was full of RIF Aviator NCOs. There were a very few really high quality NCO's and they were spread thin. The average PSG was 22-25 years old and an Acting NCO frocked to distinguish him from the crowd. VOLAR was coming to save us and the last of the draftees were returning from overseas assignments to serve out a few remaining months on active service Morale was low, suicides were high, the RIFs were still going on. Race riots in the mess halls and barracks were common. Early on the Expeditious Discharge Program was only available in USAEUR. Under that program, all it took was an 06 to sign off on the discharge and the soldier was fired. Fort Hood began rotational duties sending a brigade to EUROPE for 6 months at a time. Units deploying had a high proportion of discharges from the Expeditious Discharge Program. The improvement was noticeable and the Army adopted that globally. The draftees were gone by then, most AUS former officers retired, and the youngsters that had stood in the breach were well on their way to creating a true professional NCO Corps. Several very bright LTC's and a brilliant General Officer began to examine the true rebuilding of our force. No matter how you cut the pie, the bottom line was that the 10-13 years in Vietnam had weakened the force as a whole through attritiion. One NCO explained you could do one tour in Vietnam and figure you owed that, you could do a second tour and you coould figure that you were really needed. But when you returned and started thinking about a third tour, the odds of your luck running out made that job with your brother-in-laws' construction company look pretty damned good. That is where we lost a good part of our professional force. As a Cavalry Troop Commander it hit home as I watched my re enlistments. Sergeants with 9-11 years and Officers with 5+ years were the ones that we were literally hemorraging. As the Army began to rebuild, these professionals were retained at higher numbers and unit cohesiveness began to improve alogn with the weapons, tactics, doctrine, and quality of the soldiers we were getting on board. We could not have shifted from a largely analog force to a digitally commanded and controlled and supported force with the soldiers we had in the early 1970's, and maybe the late 1960's. By the early 1980's officers and NCO's were expected to earn collage degrees and literally had to to keep up with the caliber of soldiers that were coming in and that includes the greater roles and numbers of women. You guys on active duty now are in a position where the force is drawing inward and downward. I have been curious about your experiences post Middle East as opposed to my post Vietnam experience. Heck I am not even sure what they expect of the Army now One thing that I learned when I began to have joint assignements was that in regards to Marines, it is a Corps, the Army had 3 corps in Conus and two in Europe then. I don't even think the Marines have Armor any more and I do not know how many flags have stood down over the years. So my response is that the Armed Forces, and our Nation, has been at war a long time and we should expect to be required to sit down, rethink our purpose, and set a course to rebuild. Just an opinion.

The ranks in the military come from civilians. Most of them are US citizens. The US is a country about me. Not about us. It used to be about us...but that's been perverted over the centuries since it's founding. Now...it's all about me. Can I get mine. What's in it for me. This sort of cultural attitude does not lead to good discipline, good order following, and good military personnel. Want better personnel? Maybe start trying to get our culture back on track instead of continuing it's descent into all about me.

I don't believe it's just an 'Army' problem. Although I was never in the army, I was in the Navy back in the 60's and never saw that as a problem that it is today. I believe the lack of respect and discipline starts with parents who either don't teach these traits, or don't care. I believe you can also lay this at the doorstep of today's schools and institutions of "higher learning". Take look at what's happening now in Portland, Or., Chicago, New York or Minneapolis. As a former LEO in Los Angeles for 29 years, I watched the youth of that city slowly slide into the tank. I retired in 1995, thank goodness.
I rest my case.

Remember when then Bradley Manning was finally busted. Leading up to that point there were many indications of serious discipline problems and leadership failures. The then guy was throwing tantrums, refusing to obey orders and doing as he pleased with enlisted and officer leaders failing to hold him (Manning was a him then.) accountable. Apparently, aversion to confrontation and/or fear of not being backed by superiors allowed an unstable individual to steal thousands of files with impunity. He displayed many of the classic character traits of a security risk. When I read of his antics, I was dumbfounded at the thought that his ass wasn't booted out long before his treasonous acts.

Ha! Junior Officers too....