Posted on Sep 8, 2016
Why is there such a long wait for reserve component officer and warrant federal recognition/promotion?
457K
2.52K
3.17K
137
137
0
Can anyone tell me why the process takes so long for RC officer/warrant promotions to run through the FedRec cycle? I'm an ARNG officer and I've had my state promotion orders for CPT since the middle of April. I've been tracking my packet on the ARNG-G1 website and it was awaiting addition to a scroll until a month ago and last week the scroll was ready to start the approval DoD cycle. Thoughts?
Edited 9 y ago
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 419
I am on U06-18, received state orders back in early January. My tracker sat without update and "0" days posted for over 90 days then skipped to 7 days and said at Office of Deputy Chief of Staff Personnel. Now, its at 15 days and jumped backwards to "Awaiting Off of Judge Advocate General". Can anyone shed any light as why it doesn't reflect the actual days its been in the process, why it seemingly moved backwards, and how long it will take to come to resolution?
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
You actually went forward, so it's good news! There are DCS stops both before and after JAG.
(1)
(0)
CW5 (Join to see)
It used to be that NGB had a commitment to scroll and send up packets to start within 45 days. That time doesn't go in into the "number of days".
However, they are doing a LOT of pre-screening, which it looks like has drastically cut down on the time at JAG (based on recent scrolls). Taking that initial 'planned' 45 days out, adding an extra 30-45 days to save on MONTHS at JAG seems like a good trade.
DA just wasnt given the resources to do the extra screening required by DOD in 2016....
However, they are doing a LOT of pre-screening, which it looks like has drastically cut down on the time at JAG (based on recent scrolls). Taking that initial 'planned' 45 days out, adding an extra 30-45 days to save on MONTHS at JAG seems like a good trade.
DA just wasnt given the resources to do the extra screening required by DOD in 2016....
(2)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
My scroll is currently U04-18 and is sitting at the JAG currently 90 days on the DOD cycle, my good friend is 50 days ahead of me on scroll U02-18 he is already sitting at the SECDEF waiting for the Signature. That's pretty good !!!! I am hoping for the same results crossing my fingers.
(1)
(0)
Is anyone else here on P07-18? I think I'm in the same boat as a lot of people here, just watching the updates. So for those of you that are updating this board, please continue to do so. You all are keeping us motivated and our hopes alive. Thanks everyone!
(0)
(0)
1LT (Join to see)
I'm on this scroll brother. It moved to Judge Advocate office sometime recently. The newer comments make it look like the scrolls are moving a bit faster from JA towards SECDEF. We shall see.
(0)
(0)
It looks like U13-17 is getting leap frogged by several scrolls. I wonder what gives? Even the 2018 scrolls have nearly caught up with it.
(0)
(0)
CW5 (Join to see)
CW5 (Join to see) - It seems to me that given the DoD is fully aware of how antiquated this process is and how long it takes they should allow all officers with unit vacancy promotions to submit packets one full year in advance. Once the packets/scrolls have been vetted and approved, just delay publication of the federal recognition/promotion order until the individual has met their time in grade requirement. Seems like a win-win to me.
(1)
(0)
CW5 (Join to see)
Very legitimate point, and (I think) a good proposal.
I think I've posted before, I dont know about the RLO promo system, but ALL NG Warrant Officer promotions are Unit Vacancy Promos. NGR 600-101 allows packets to go to the State Federal Recognition Boards up to 120 days before TIG is met. It was raised from 90 days early in 2014. Maybe they should consider raising another 30, 60 or 90 days since the requirements of the FedRec system have had major changes since that last update to the reg.
However, we were told that the Fed Rec process (perhaps, at best) is supposed to take 4-6 months, and that is considered 'acceptable'. This is why we can submit 4 months early.
But you know, I keep track and will usually send out emails to WOs in my units, telling them they are 8-9 months away from promotion eligibility and that they should submit packets 6 months early. It takes about 2 months to work through Chain of Command and get processed by G1 before going to FRB. But I cant think of a single time in the past few years anyone ever submitted early.
I dont think there's any conspiracy to save money or anything, I just think its the normal inefficiency of DA Staff processes. But it seems that getting back pay and DOR to date of State orders is a no-brainer. ESPECIALLY for WOs, who as UVPs, are doing the work of the extra responsibility.
I think I've posted before, I dont know about the RLO promo system, but ALL NG Warrant Officer promotions are Unit Vacancy Promos. NGR 600-101 allows packets to go to the State Federal Recognition Boards up to 120 days before TIG is met. It was raised from 90 days early in 2014. Maybe they should consider raising another 30, 60 or 90 days since the requirements of the FedRec system have had major changes since that last update to the reg.
However, we were told that the Fed Rec process (perhaps, at best) is supposed to take 4-6 months, and that is considered 'acceptable'. This is why we can submit 4 months early.
But you know, I keep track and will usually send out emails to WOs in my units, telling them they are 8-9 months away from promotion eligibility and that they should submit packets 6 months early. It takes about 2 months to work through Chain of Command and get processed by G1 before going to FRB. But I cant think of a single time in the past few years anyone ever submitted early.
I dont think there's any conspiracy to save money or anything, I just think its the normal inefficiency of DA Staff processes. But it seems that getting back pay and DOR to date of State orders is a no-brainer. ESPECIALLY for WOs, who as UVPs, are doing the work of the extra responsibility.
(1)
(0)
CW5 (Join to see)
The ONLY good thing I can say about the scrolling process is that once you are on a scroll, promotion is inevitable (unless you have skeletons in your closet) we just have to grin and bear it in the meantime.
(0)
(0)
CW5 (Join to see)
U13-17 has now moved to OSD! The scroll only spent a week at Secretary of the Army. Tracking 269 days. Here's to getting the damned thing published soon.
(2)
(0)
It is actually longer, my daughter still hasn't made Captain, she has been waiting 4 years as a Reserve 1st It, still no promo date for O-3
(0)
(0)
Put in yet another call (only 3 total) to Ms. Marshall and left another message. If anyone gets ahold of her, can you also ask about P12-17? My FedRec tracker has been indicating "Awaiting Dir of Army Staff Appr" for a few weeks now. I'd greatly appreciate it!
(0)
(0)
Glad to see all the updates on scroll movements. Anyone have updates on P11-17(266days)?
(0)
(0)
1LT (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - Thanks! I really hope so. I was told by Renee Marshall on the 6th that it was at ASA. GKO shows DMPM, so I really hope you're right!
(0)
(0)
CW5(P) (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - Check your IPERMS Chief. My FEDREC order showed up today... Not showing on the Tracker yet.
(0)
(0)
Scroll P13-17 we are nearly done. We are at the office of sec defense. The last step. Be checking your iperms.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Any word from Renee on P13-17? I'm deployed and the time frame to call back there is a bit jacked up. Typically not very timely e-mail responses from her, either, but I'm sure she's swamped. Last time I tried, it took 3 emails over a month + to get a reply, but that was 3-4 months ago.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
MAJ (Join to see) - Sir, in case you didn't see the update above from CPT (Join to see): "It sounds like a lot of us are at SECDEF. I called Rene and she said P13-17 got there March 6, so we could get the fedrec orders in our iperms at any moment. I have drill this weekend so I'm hoping it hits in the next 48 hours."
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CPT (Join to see) - I must've missed that one. I was wondering when we hit that step, thanks for passing it along.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
P13-17 got published! hooray for all of us, and for the others still in the process - I hope it goes faster than ours!
(0)
(0)
Another day of checking my scroll. Another day of no movement. 13-17 still stuck at DCS G1. All I want is to see its at OSD. This is the worst process ever. Does this only happen to vacancy promotions? Do folks who get boarded get theirs faster? What is the difference in the process?
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I am also 13-17. I keep trying to stop myself from looking every week, but I always give in and end up disappointed. The DA board does usually go faster, yes.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
So these are two different processes, obviously... The DA Board you must meet the requirements for that FY and particular board. Currently 4 - 6 years TIG for 1LT to CPT depending on the particular board. The Board meets and eventually releases the results, last year they recessed in May and released the results in November, then you need to be in an O3 spot to get promoted. Even with the ridiculous wait time for the UVP process, it is still faster than waiting on the DA Board, waiting for their results and finding a vacant position to be promoted into. I do not believe the USAR has a UVP process.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I only meant that the process itself of having the board, releasing results and pinning is typically faster.(with the assumption that you are already in a slot) The overall process to get to the day of eligibility for higher ranks is usually much longer for DA. I just left Active Duty in 2016. Would have been eligible for first MAJ board in 2019 under their timeline. Instead, I got approved for a UV pretty quickly and started Fed Rec process for O4 in Jun 2017.(lucky that my resume was very full from all those AD years) If Fed Rec was an efficient and reasonable 90 day process, then I'd have been promoted more than 2 years earlier than my AD counterparts. Even with this unnecessarily long process, the promotion is likely to be at least a year earlier than AD would have been. Hard to complain about that part.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Last year's O-3 to O-4 board convened in March, but orders weren't published until September. I'm currently on P13-17 with you guys but this month would have been my first look via DA Board. I'm still hoping we get these orders before those guys going to board this month....it's sounding possible after all.
(0)
(0)
P11-17 still at DMPM/252days and counting... Funny how I was expecting orders to be published around 180days, but now I'm hoping it doesn't go over 360days... Ugh... Glad I'm close to retirement. Tired of dealing with crap like this...
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Ive written to my senator and congressman. If it isn't fixed in the next couple years I am going to the reserves. This is absurd.
(2)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
I'll get you a scroll # Brad. I spoke to him over drill this weekend but didn't get a scroll #.
(1)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - Yup, passed up U06-17 as the longest running scroll (with no known flag) in some time.
(0)
(0)
My packet was sent in December to NGB and it’s still sitting at 0 days awaiting assignment to scroll. What was everyone’s average time at 0?
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
I'm at day 230, I was at OT Jag from day 77 to day 223. I'm guessing another 3 months.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
P04-18 was at OTJAG for about 32 days. Maybe they are starting to get their crap ironed out. Hasn't hit the G1 tracker yet but I guess we are at DMPM now and only 65 DOD days into the process..... Maybe we'll spend 150 days at DMPM! blah
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Finally at SecDef!!!
228 days
Hey what's the reg/pamphlet/etc that covers that this timelime SHOULD be?
228 days
Hey what's the reg/pamphlet/etc that covers that this timelime SHOULD be?
(0)
(0)
I'm on 13-17 and we are out of OTJAG and DMPM, presently with DCS G1. How much longer are we in this thing? I'm assuming we have passed the longest offices but I know that might be wishful thinking.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Hard to say, I was at OTJAG until OCT, our scroll was finally published end of January on P08. Estimate 3-4 months?
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I am on P10-17. A couple of weeks ago someone on my scroll contacted OPM and was told 30-60 days, but I find that doubtful at this point. The 3-4 months CPT Zenzen mentioned sounds more reasonable. We are at DCS G1 as well, and at 250 days on the scroll today. From what I'm tracking for the P01-17 through P09-17 scrolls that have published, the scroll day range prior to receiving promotion orders has been 175-283 days, with an average of 227 so far.
(0)
(0)
Anyone have any idea where this is in the process. Been at OT JAG since day 77. Tracker shows it moved here today.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
The tracker isn't current a lot of times. They only update it once a month from what I understand. You could be further along than you think. CW2 Brad's tracker is more accurate. I'm not sure how he gets it but it is way more up to date than the one at the self service site.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
CPT (Join to see) - Not my tracker sir, it came from my state OPM. However the information is available in DPRO (you need access to it, typically S/G/J-1's will have access).
(0)
(0)
As funny as many of these posts are...the real reason it takes so long Is that your packet has to go through, literally, 16 separate offices. This does not include what happens at your state. For some reason it has to go through like 3 separate JAG offices. This issue has been brought up by our leadership numerous times to NGB and per the usual NGB response was, "oh well." So don't expect it to get any better any time soon.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I love it, First get the Promotion order, 4 months later request for retirement, 90 days later retire.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
It sounds like there are so many hands in the cookie jar that it has turned into a self-licking ice cream cone.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
MAJ (Join to see) - Soon we are going to be the "old timers" on this post. Back in my day our scrolls went over 300 days!
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CPT (Join to see) - I would accept that if it improves. If Fed Rec is still this bad when I'm up for Major, I can't say for sure that I won't cross over to the Reserves. I don't want to do this again.
(1)
(0)
Bad news for those on D08-17, apparently your G1 trackers showing it has been at OSD for over four months is erroneous. My state's G1 just relayed an update to me that showed that scroll as being reported in error. It is actually at DMPM as of 310 days on your trackers. Sorry.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - The info that you saw wouldn't happen to show P08-17, would it?
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - Thanks for the update... now that the SNAFU has been identified, I truly hope D08-17 is rushed over to OSD and signature.
(1)
(0)
I'm glad to see some scrolls are finally being published. U13-17 is now at 180days and still at OTJAG. This entire process is extremely frustrating to say the least.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Sounds like U10-17 if signed and on its way back to NGB for IPERMS publishing. Hopefully that means U11 is not far behind.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - U10-17 has published. Chief Hoffman just posted the screenshot.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Ya, I heard about this last week. Hopefully, U11 isn't far behind. I've been at OT JAG for 139 days now.
(0)
(0)
For those of you on P08-17, U06-17, and D08-17 I highly suggest submitting a congressional inquiry to your local representative. It was a very quick process, and I had a response back from them in a few days. It may not solve the issue quickly, but at this point there is serious incompetence at NGB that needs to be addressed. If the Guard leadership wants to hound on accountability and retention, it's laughable that they don't address these issues!
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I contacted my congressman by going to his website on the House of Representative website and sending an email using the "contact" link. After two days a person from his office contacted me and emailed a release form I had to sign for an inquiry. The person said he is already working an inquiry from my district and has been in contact with both NGB and big army. From our discussion it sounded like a lot of people are aware of the issue. I would encourage everyone to contact their representative...hopefully if we make enough noise the right person will hear and try to find a meaningful resolution.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next