Will Hillary Clinton's Campaign Use The Nuclear Option To Defeat Trump?

PO3 Donald Murphy - Just who did she kill?

MSG Stan Hutchison - The book "American Evita" is a non-partisan story of Hilary's rise to power. The writer is not American and neither loves Hilary nor hates her. His purpose is merely to describe how she came to power, where her power came from, and most importantly, HOW she uses her power. The book lists many people who disagreed with Hilary that are suddenly no longer with us, wink wink. So if you "disagree" or "object" with Hilary, you kinda do it at your peril. Now of course it could all just be a coincidence, but then again...

PO3 Donald Murphy - I attempted to read that book when it came out. It was so biased it was unreadable by anyone with any common sense. Here is what USA Today had to say about the book when it came out back in 2004:
"Christopher Andersen's American Evita is sure to delight those who hate Hillary Clinton and be dismissed by those who admire her.
And:
"It's impossible to distinguish the reporting from the rumors in the book."
And:
"The book ends with five pages of "sources and chapter notes," but they merely list interviews and previously published materials used for each chapter, not who specifically said what. "
And, finally:
"But after 18 books, including four about the Kennedys, Andersen could be suffering from his own addiction: writing about celebrities."

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/books/reviews/2004-07-05-american-evita_x.htm
His "purpose" was to sell books.
No Thanks. I'll stick to actual facts.

MSG Stan Hutchison - I read it on night shift so maybe I was just bored. It was back in 2005 when I read it. It wasn't a contradicting or difficult read.

Vote for Cpt. Jack in Nov...

She has asked if we trust Trump with the nuclear deterrent . But the ad with the little girl with those beautiful eyes and then the Atom bomb blast just about ended Goldwater as a presidential candidate... It sure as hell got my attention

Sgt Tom Cunnally - Her credibility lessens with every passing day...

Alan K. - The Russians have her email server (presumed) and have the dems files on Trump (fact). Some big things will be released as Russia decides which candidate best suits their interest.

CPT Mark Gonzalez - I have a feeling on which candidate that may be.

Oh, welcome to my very special Benghazi swift-boat block list. Talking to people who trust Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beckband Bill O'Reilly is less interesting than watching dry paint get dryer.

Sir, what could you care less about? This one man dares to challenge the system? He must be crushed? A family has to maintain its strangle hold on power? This must continue? Do you hate based on facts or do you hate because the cast of SNL, Daily Show, Fallon, CNN, Fox et al tell you to? He only used words not deeds. You can't change her deeds. He can change his words.

Trump is a loud mouth. Getting Swift Boated or Nuked, not necessary. He is doing a fine job on his own.

Does any one remember the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut or Iran/Contra?

SPC Kirk Gilles - Trump is not daring to challenge the system, he is exploiting the system and the electorate for personal gain. The only person Donald Trump has ever cared about is Donald Trump.

From his schoolyard insults to his outright racism (even Paul Ryan agreed on his attacking a federal judge), Trump is a naracississtic bully, a xenophobe and a buffoon. I have never been embarrassed for my country until one of our two parties nominated this guy.

The wall, attacking a federal judge, childish name-calling, his many fraud schemes, mocking a reporter's disability on stage, suggesting that Japan and S. Korea get nukes, his tax plan (yup, mor tax cuts for the rich), the list goes of, and on, and on for why this guy is a dangerous embarrassment. He's also the loudest and most o noxious of the birthers.

He is the first candidate in history that has driven lifelong members of his political party (which he moved to recently) to leave their party and in some cases even endorse the oth party's candidate.

Trump is an absolute disgrace.

Just saw a Warren ad where she was blasting Trump for not paying taxes. Two problems, one of the people she showed was a Trump voter and does anyone seriously believe the most political IRS ever would give Trump a pass? Back to the reservation with you faus Pocahontas.

MCPO Roger Collins - Liz Warren is a hypocrite She refused to release her taxes when she ran for the senate vs Scott Brown because she had not held a political office before running for the senate. So the Boston Globe and Scoot Brown got on her case after he released his for six years. Finally Liz released her and her husband's Taxes for two years that showed they made some big bucks in real estate investing but she lambasted Trump for his real estate earnings just recently ..Apparently she is not a Cherokee Indian but much wealthier than she has claimed earing big bucks teaching a few hours a week at Harvard that she tried to hide. And not have to defend when she debated Brown..

What is going to be interesting is her hate for banks and investment companies are inconsistent with the Democratic presumptive nominee's huge campaign contributions. Talk about flawed candidates.

That is an astute observation, I suspect Warren is how Clinton plans on holding onto the liberal wing of the party while she goes full corporatist. The problem is that at some point Warren is going to need to denounce Clinton policies or lose the very credibility with the left that Clinton is attempting to secure.

Trump admits he's not totally ethical in his business dealings and people accept him because he is a straight shooter. He tells it like it is and doesn't hide behind political correctness. While his narcissism is a turn-off, I find his lack of political correctness and honesty refreshing. Hillary, on the other hand, should not even be allowed to run until she answers investigators and is cleared of all allegations... and we all know that that isn't going to happen in our lifetimes. Nobody in their right mind would vote for Hillary if she came clean on all her lying and cheating and leveled with the American people.

What has she to run on other than trying to discredit Trump and play up the fact she is female? At least Trump can point to his success in the Private Sector, and he doesn't accept bribes from foreign countries in the form of speeches that he's paid millions of dollars to give, nor does he launder campaign money through foundations. Hmmm. The choice is rather obvious for anyone with a sense of integrity and a clue.

You are right. Hillary and the libs have bought enough votes from those who would sell their soles to get anything for free. The only thing is, nothing is free.

"To me, it shows the progressivism of Arkansas,” Ms. Pruitt said. “We once belonged to this Confederacy, however, today, we have our own state flag and we actually represent the United States of America.”..interesting way of saying F*ck this. Nothing is going to change. Ms Pruit wouldn't happen to be a fake name for this woman would it?

Yes Sir. Great observation.