Posted on Feb 27, 2021
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
50.3K
1.7K
702
Since military benefits are lost on day 61 of a criminal conviction, will we finally see the retired and/or separated insurrectionist veterans lose their retirements, GI/9-11 bills, and VA benefits and stop them leeching off a government they wanted to overturn in the first place?

In addition, will we see their respective services follow precedent and subject those retirees to Court Martials, as they are still bound by UCMJ after retirement?
Edited 3 y ago
Comments have been disabled
Responses: 127
PV2 Glen Lewis
Regardless of the felony, if they are convicted and incarcerated for over 61 days they will lose a percentage of their benefits. After incarceration they may or may not lose a lesser or greater percentage depending on the severity of the law they broke.
Personal opinion would be that insurrectionist is too severe a term for what was done. I find what what was done to be stupid and disgusting but hardly insurrection. I believe breaking and entering, defacement of government property, theft and assault and battery would cover the crowd's actions. Felonies but not out and out revolt.
SGT Human Resources Specialist
Incredible how so many responses are WHAT ABOUT CNN BLM AUNT TEEFA?! Instead of actually staying on topic and answering the question
SGT Human Resources Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
3 y
SSG Robert Perrotto I never claimed to answer I just asked why people scapegoat and whine about liberals constantly and then like clockwork you also cried about liberals
SSG Robert Perrotto
SSG Robert Perrotto
3 y
SGT (Join to see) - because it is the Liberals that are controlling the Narrative.
SSG Robert Perrotto
SSG Robert Perrotto
3 y
SGT (Join to see) - Fairly certain that if a group of veterans wanted to overthrow our government, it would have been a far better showing then a bunch of fucking selfies and minor destruction of property. Any Combat arms NCO with a lick of tactical sense could have come up with a better plan then then just running around taking selfies.
PO2 David McNamara
I would like to know if you are referring to people who were waved into the Capitol Building by police as being insurrectionists? Anyone creating a disturbance was filmed, and they were called out by the recording bystanders, and other witnesses, as being antifa. Are any retirees/veterans belonging to antifa? Colluding with antifa would be treason; I would hope retirees/veterans wouldn't do that. When the Capitol Police are waving citizens to go inside are they taking a tour (hoping to voice their opinion) or are they engaging in an insurrection?
MSgt Gilbert Jones
MSgt Gilbert Jones
3 y
Sorry, the QAnon, and Proud Boys were trying to say their people were Antifa to cover up their action. But then, you are going to believe what you want to and not the true facts.
SGT William Jackson
SGT William Jackson
3 y
And you MSgt are going to believe what you want and can't see the true facts. All you have to do is look at this screwed up pres and his party right now, I think maybe you have been fed a lot of blue kool-aid and want more, and keep voting for those like Biden and Harris and see what happens. I did not like what happened at the Capital but I do understand it, and the way things are going and the facts of today, yea it was a fraudulent election!
Sgt Robert Beverly
Every one of the 6 Jan. 2021 traitors should loose all their benefits. A bunch of right wing racist traitors trying to overthrow a verified lawful election and install a racist fascist dictator that belongs in prison. They deserve nothing but scorn and jail. Keep GitMo open for those that really belong there.

As far as the 2020 BLM demonstrations, most of the problems were started by the police not the peaceful protesters. BLM protesters were patriots exercising their Constitutional rights. As a former LEO I state the police were out of line. I was in communication with a former Vietnam medic during the demonstrations in Oregon, an eye witness with many photographs. Were there bad actors yes, but in general the protests were peaceful until vamped upon by the cops. Two completely different situations.
SFC Craig Titzkowski
SFC Craig Titzkowski
3 y
Why is it so hard to get a total recount and why so much fighting back when the apposing side asks. Got to admit it's weird how voting changed and how we verify months weeks and day with out state legislative branches voting on it because of a pandemic that got ride of flue for this past year. Then you have question why one questions the other. Amazing. The Capital Guards walked them in anyways. They took pictures very small amount of people what about supreme court justices hearing being interrupted and people in the halls banging on the doors wasn't much worry then they didn't clear the floor then. Oh on the Jan 6th day did they find and weapons or were there any reported. Wow be fair weight both sides then look at your convictions.
TSgt Jeff Milges
TSgt Jeff Milges
3 y
Get back on your meds, your so far out in Left field.
SGT William Jackson
SGT William Jackson
3 y
Wow man, i think that cold weather has affected your ability to think straight.
PFC Watercraft Operator
You are a disgrace. Those veterans are not "insurrectionists."
MSgt Gilbert Jones
MSgt Gilbert Jones
3 y
SFC Titzkowski, I agree with you hold heartly, those that came out to the marches at night and did all the damage should be arrested and jailed. Not the peaceful BLM marchers that only marched. The others were nothing more then thugs who were taking advange of the peaceful marchers who had a right to demonstrate.

Those who marched up to the capital and then attacked the police and crossed the barricades, beat the police officer who tried to stop them, and then broke into the capital were nothing more then thugs and insurrectionist no if and butts about it. These individuals should be treated accordingly. I personally would like to see them loose their voting rites - they aren't citizens of this country, that can't be. I hope citizens of this country wouldn't act like that These are spoiled individuals who can't have their way want to destroy what they don't like, just as some small children react.
TSgt Larry Cohen
Just because they are retired gi's and they went into the Capitol that doesn't mean they were insurrectionists. The ones that did damage, were antifa, I knew one of the people there and she told me more than msm has released. Mom, is playing the pelosi mantra.
LTC Joe Anderson
To date here is what has been charged in relations to Jan 6th: 0 Weapons Charges, 0 insurrection Chargers, and 0 Conspiracy to Overthrow the Government or related charges... On average charges range from Knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building, to; violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; knowingly engaging in disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building; Obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder; obstruction of justice/Congress...

So far, NO charges like sedition or insurrection have been filed. No charges have been filed that could possibly have a VET recalled to active duty to face UCMJ charges. Any member of the Active-Duty Component arrested could face administrative action and/or UCMJ charges depending on any crimes they are charged with. Having said that I have not seen any Charges filed against Active-Duty Component members. Simple being outside the capitol building isn't grounds for UCMJ. There was one Guardsman arrested. However, he's Tittle 32. Good luck recalling him to active duty for UCMJ (Look up Title 32 Applications and Restrictions to UCMJ and you will see why.).


https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/
MSG Clyde Mills
Like I said follow the link I provided and it will show and tell you all the information you seek about the so called questions your asking about Retirees after they Retire and how the UCMJ effects them once they retire. Plain and simple you didn’t do your homework before you made the First Initial Post and Question regarding this matter and it shows. Your lack of Military knowledge from the get go and without having the correct knowledge and Correct Regulations to back up what your posting, sorry but your credibility has sailed off into the wild blue yonder, like a hot air filled balloon.
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
3 y
Mr. Mills, let me in on a secret, I did my research, hence my post asking whether we will actually see the law being used, not what is the law.

It is obvious you are not familiar with 10 USC Sect. 802 Art. 2, where it is clear who is and is not subject to Court Martials under UCMJ.
As Paragraph a (4) notes, indeed “Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay” are still under UCMJ, so that part of my question was correct.

Apparently, you didn't read the VA documentation you are given, where they make it clear that "Veterans in receipt of VA pension will have payments terminated effective the 61st day after imprisonment in a Federal, State, or local penal institution for conviction of a felony or misdemeanor. Payments may be resumed upon release from prison if the Veteran meets VA eligibility requirements."

Noticed the part where it says payments may resume IF the veteran meets VA eligibility once released? IF they meet eligibility. If their respective services change the classification of their service as a result of a Court Martial, then guess what, they not only lose their retirement but their VA benefits, if they had any. No Regs., just plain old welcome to the VA literature and their own website.

My "military knowledge" is just fine, as I believe you meant something else.

As for my credibility, it must have sailed off searching for the link you said you provided but a search of this page could not find. Oh well.
MSG Clyde Mills
MSG Clyde Mills
3 y
Ah yes young Grasshopper, but you did not, say that in your initial post, you said after the 61st day of being Convicted. Where as the Regulation says 61st. Day of Confinenement. The person could remain out of jail for quite some time on appeals before ever stepping foot inside a prison or Jail to serve their sentence.SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
PFC Andrew "Tommy" M.
I'm just going to leave this quote here for Sgt. Rojas
Mark Twain ~ "Better to remain silent & thought a fool than to open one's mouth & remove all doubt."
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA
3 y
I am more of a Walt Whitman person myself, and one of my favorites quotes from him is "Be curious, not judgmental."
SSG Robert Perrotto
SSG Robert Perrotto
3 y
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA - but your use of the term "Insurrectionist" is in fact judgemental - none have been charged with that as of yet.
LTC Joe Anderson
Edited 3 y ago
FYI - Military personnel can be recalled to serve active duty if needed. If they fall under Category I: Nondisabled military retirees under the age of 60 who have been retired less than five years. This category is disposed to be recalled during times of war, national emergency, or “needs of the service”. IF the retiree isn't in the retired reserve, been retried for over 5 years, over 60, or retired under Tittle 32 they are not subject to recall or the UCMJ. Our service isn't for life. Thus neither is the Jurisdiction of the UCMJ.

If a Vets convicted, can a Veteran Receive Retired Military Pay While In Prison?
Generally, yes. Being convicted of a crime almost never jeopardizes a federal pension – the rare exception to this rule are charges relating to criminal disloyalty to the United States: espionage, treason, sabotage, etc. Therefore, retirement pay could continue. Military retirement pay is not automatically stopped for incarceration AFTER retirement. According to the Hiss Act, as amended in 1961, only convictions (after retirement) for "crimes of national security" could lose retirement pay or benefits. So far the charges range from conspiracy, civil disorder, obstruction of an official proceeding, knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, disorderly conduct, vandalism, trespassing, theft, and destruction of property. So at this time their benefits are safe. Anyone who does get changed with insurrection may have their benefits at risk. But read the insurrection act. There are some criteria elements of the crime that must be met to be charged and tried. Probably why no one has been charged with insurrection so far. While I don't agree with those who entered the building I don't see where it meets the legal definition of insurrection. I agree with the charges filed to date of vandalism, trespassing, theft, and destruction of property.

Can A Veteran Receive VA Benefits While In Prison?
VA can pay certain benefits to veterans who are incarcerated in a Federal, state or local penal institution. However, the amount they can pay depends on the type of benefit and reason for incarceration. Your monthly payment will be reduced beginning with the 61st day of your imprisonment for a felony. If your disability payment before you went to prison was based on a rating of 20% disabled or higher your new payment will be based on the 10% disability rating. If you were receiving disability at the 10% disability rate your new payment will be cut in half. If you are imprisoned in a Federal, State or local penal institution as the result of conviction of a felony or misdemeanor, such pension payment will be discontinued effective on the 61st day of imprisonment following conviction.

https://www.military.com/benefits/veteran-benefits/incarcerated-veterans.html
LTC Joe Anderson
LTC Joe Anderson
3 y
SGT Hector Rojas, AIGA, SHA - We agree. Have a Great evening!!
SFC Craig Titzkowski
SFC Craig Titzkowski
3 y
Thanks for the fact and thanks for the freedom to have my own option to everyone
LTC Joe Anderson
LTC Joe Anderson
3 y
A1C Tiger H - Your friend was not a VET. He was on active duty, charged and convicted with a crime on active duty. Which as it should have stopped his pay, gave him a bad paper discharge, and ending any VA/Veteran benefits. That ends a service members pay, claims to the GI Bill, VA Benefits... The only way to change that is to have his discharge changed to Honorable. Otherwise the UCMJ is clear your friend is not eligible for pay, retirement, the GI Bill, VA Benefits... Your friend situation is NOT the same as retirees and those with honorable discharges being charged with a civilian crime. It "Apple and Oranges!" Vets pay and benefits will not be affected if charged for the capital building fiasco. However active duty members do risk losing pay, possible loss of retirement, risk a bad conduct discharge...
LTC Joe Anderson
LTC Joe Anderson
3 y
A1C Tiger H - The VA disability paperwork refers to VA benefits not military pension. I have already posted what would happen above. But here's a break down of what happens to a vet (Not in the retired Reserve ((They are subject to recall)) convicted of a crime after retirement. Military pensions would not be affected because of incarceration's unless it's for Treason or such acts. The reason being that that pension was already earned under honorable service and can not be taken away for criminal acts once a Vet fully retired (The exception being those in the Retired Reserve or Subject to recall under Category I). I could get convicted of Murder and I would keep my military pension.

Disabled Vets depending on their disability rating would receive prorated compensations since the State and Feds would take care of their medical needs while incarcerated. The amount they can be paid depends on the type of benefit and reason for incarceration. A Vets monthly payment will be reduced beginning with the 61st day of their imprisonment for a felony. If a Vets disability payment before they went to prison was based on a rating of 20% disabled or higher their new payment will be based on the 10% disability rating. If They were receiving disability at the 10% disability rate your new payment will be cut in half. If a Vets was imprisoned in a Federal, State or local penal institution as the result of conviction of a felony or misdemeanor, such pension payment will be discontinued effective on the 61st day of imprisonment following conviction per the scale I just mentions. Those who were considered 100 percent disable would still get a portion of their VA pensions but much reduced since the institution they are housed in would cover their medical needs while they are in. Once the Vet has been released they would be entitled to start receiving their full benefits again.

Its a complicated calculation, but Vets don't just lose their retirement pay on conviction, and VA pay and benefits may be suspended or reduced on conviction. But will be reinstated once they have served their time. Life sentences being the obvious exception. But they would still receive their military's retirement throughout their incarceration. Once retirement has been earned its tough to take away. Not impossible but tough. Doing something stupid like trespassing in the capitol building during a riot does not change that for vets. Active Components and Retired Reserve members do risk losing their pay retirement... They have not yet ended their commitments, have not been discharged or fully discharged and are subject to UCMJ and or recall. If you meant those who didn't retire and only collect a VA pension then you are partially correct. They would lose pay at the rate I explained above after their 61st day of incarceration.

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close