Posted on Feb 7, 2014
SFC Founder
22.8K
137
86
5
5
0
Should the Military take over functions currently run by Civilians? Considering my recent experience dealing with backstabbing Civilians, I think that they should reduce the Civilian Workforce and turn over certain functions bsck to Military control.
Posted in these groups: Military leadership skills civilian employment CiviliansSecurity contractors Contractors
Edited 12 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 53
Lt Col Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Commander
1
1
0
When in doubt, "Follow the money!"  Some military jobs are just too expensive to stay military jobs, when you factor in true mission need vs. military pay and benefits.  The trend will probably continue until the point on the X and Y axis when the bean counters finally say "we are efficient".  Sorry man, the tax payers are demanding true fiscal accountability and, if you have been in the military long enough, that has not been one of our strong suits.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Senior Ordnance Logistics Officer
1
1
0

SSG Fleming,

There are certain functions that most certainly should be controlled by military personnel, but others require the continuity that our civilian counterparts provide.  Your post doesn't provide very much background as to your current situation.  I see from your profile information that you are stationed at Yongsan Garison, South Korea.  I have spent three years of my career in South Korea and have to wonder if your discontent is with Korean national civilians or DOD civilians.  Is your discontent based on cultural differences or misunderstandings?  Overall I have had positive experiences working with Civil Service employees and contract civilian employees, though I have had a couple of isolated issues.


During my first PCS move, I had an issue with an employee in a post child development center who I felt provided substandard customer service.  My wife and I had not utilized the child development center at our previous duty station.  We were new to the PCS process and had no knowledge of the services provided by the CDCs.  The CDC employee that we dealt with spoke down to us in a very condescending manner.  I suppose she answered the same questions day in and day out, thus felt the answers should already be known by everyone seeking service at her facility.  That was an isolated incident, certainly not the norm.


I wish you better success in future interaction with our Civilian counterparts.

(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Founder
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Chief,

My experience was with DoD Civilians and I had met and worked with some wonderful Korean national civilians.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Michael Briales
1
1
0
I think it's a little unfair to say that about contractors. I was active duty for 21 years, 1x tour Desert Storm, 1x tour Iraq, 3x tours Afghanistan and now I am a contractor myself, and trust me, there are some contractors who ARE worthless but not all of them. When I was active duty, I became friends with some of them, and some others I had questions about. So not all contractors are bad, besides when some of you ETS, or retire you might become one of those "contractors"!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Nate Huff
1
1
0
SFC Signal Support Systems Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
12 y
so you read the blurb as to how they arrived to that number. take the entire money spent on afghanistan as a whole, and divide it by the number of Service members (obviously ignoring the contractors there) did you also read where the majority of rising costs is weapons maintenance?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Nate Huff
SSgt Nate Huff
12 y
It's the paycheck you are comparing?  That is all you see, and it's obvious that you are not willing to look at the actual cost per person.  I am a contractor working for the US military in Okinawa Japan, I don't live on base, I can use the US hospital but it is EXTREMELY expensive.  Even with the paycheck that I receive I am still cheaper for the US military than a trained and experienced military member would be by tens of thousands of dollars.  But because I make more money than the military member, I am some bottom feeding lowlife.  Nevermind the fact that I served on Active Duty in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Signal Support Systems Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
12 y
Whenever the subject of comparable pay comes up, one side only ever brings up base pay, while the other tries to equate all the benefits you receive into monetary value: $30,000 vs $57,000 for that 4 year SGT.

not exactly personnel related but: since my unit is disbanding, they chose not to renew our copier contract for another year. out of 3, 2 are irreparable (or at least would cost too much for a single visit) 
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Assistant Operations Officer (S3)
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
It's how elected officials can say they cut a particular budget. Contractors come from a different budget than normal manning. The more important question is why is the government not capitalizing on the talents they have organic to their units? I work in an IN BN. One of my PFCs is an ASE mechanic. He could provide services on vehicles, if we owned them. I could train Soldiers to Lifeguard and we could provide our own guards for PT and such. Instead of doing such things. The government actually writes laws prohibiting some of these things. Requiring that contractors perform work. Usually, at 2-3x the cost.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG G2 Ncoic
1
1
0

I am torn on this one right now as I have 19 that work for me and do a great job. I the OIC of a JRSOI hub and my contractors do all the instructing and scheduling. This allows the Soldiers to do the job that the Army trained them to do.

 

However you are right that there is an over abundance of them taking away from what we as Soldiers are paid to do.

(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Donald Sweeting
1
1
0

As a veteran of the Armed Services and a current Civil Service employee I have been on both sides of the fence. We are all entitled to our own opinion and generally speaking that opinion is usually based on the experiences that you have had, whether good or bad. Not knowing the exact "functions" you speak of it is difficult to say whether they would be better served by the military taking them over. This should be very evident to you in the environment that you are currently in as I assume you are still in Korea. Having served two tours in Korea myself and understanding the constant turnover of Military folks and the impacts that has on day to day operations I would submit to you that there may be validity in leaving some of those functions with the civilian workforce. Continuity or institutional knowledge of an organization can be a great asset when striving to make an organization better than it was previously. Conversely it can be a hindrance as well if that person with the institutional knowledge has a negative impact on the workforce around them when leadership attempts to implement change.

Your narrow minded point of view that all civilians are backstabbers only shows that you may be a part of the problem and not a part of the solution. No matter what organization you are in there is bound to be that one bad apple that just spoils the entire barrel. But to categorize all civilians as the same would be like saying that all soldiers are pompous and self centered and cause trouble when in downtown Seoul. Just simply not a true statement but if you ask those in surrounding communities you might get that type of response from at least a few.

I would be curious to know what those functions are that you speak of as your post is very ambiguous which of course prompts many responses but if you truly want to impact change you need to provide clarity.

(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Force Development
1
1
0

There I a difference between contractors and civil servants (DA Civilians).  My last two jobs my bosses/rater has been a civilian.  They have overwhelmingly been dedicated to the army and the Soldiers in it.  A lady in my office retired with 40 years of service and she will be missed because of her hard work and dedication. 

Contractors are a wild card, they are a for profit worker. Many care and are trying to make a difference. 

Remember, we operate under civilian leadership, we work for the American people.  The President, SECDEF, SECAR are all civilians.

(1)
Comment
(0)
PO3 David Packham
PO3 David Packham
>1 y
There is a *huge* difference between the two, you have that right on target!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Therese Mangham
1
1
0
I came in the military during the in 1980's and the Army was self contained. There was no such thing as civilians on the gates until OIF. The scope of the military mission changed and the requirements of the force changed. Backstabbing happens in the military also, believe me as female who encountered sexism on every level. I didn't complain because there was no one to complain too at the time. I loved serving the military and did my job to the best of my ablility. In life, you will encounter backstabbing everywhere you go but, you can choose to make the best of your situation or complain and do nothing.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Cornelius Walsh
1
1
0
<p>There may be, but the DA Civilians and for that matter, the GS folks I work with bring a lot to the table, and most have quite a bit of green-suit experience. I'm happy to have them here, and they've helped to train and mentor me alongside my other leaders.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC(P) Motor Transport Operator
1
1
0
I had a conversation with my 1SG, an he raised some valid point, certain circumstances require us to outsource to save money. But when it comes down to actual work, that is MOS related we should do it. It is what we get paid for, cutting grass and little things like that we can cut cost by outsourcing.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close