Posted on Dec 17, 2014
SFC Michael Jackson, MBA
532K
3.27K
1.01K
810
809
1
Multicam joint
Airforce multicam
Multicam army
the closest I seen to a standard uniform for the Armed Forces was the multicam uniform when I was in Kandahar, and Air Force all wearing the uniform at one point with few deviations. Would do feel about this?
Posted in these groups: 4276e14c UniformsOfficers logo OfficersImages 20 NCOsDod color DoD
Avatar feed
Responses: 698
SGT John Fritz
0
0
0
Doesn't the uniform requirement have to fit the needs on the specific mission? More so the environment that they will be going to to defend us.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL John Hudson
0
0
0
Chief, and ALLCON: I was at the last combined LOGEX held at Fort Picket back in the day. A Joint Field Ex - we had Canadian military types with us as well. They shared with us the Canadian military tried that very idea, and it was the biggest "Recruiting" disaster ever in the history of the Canadian armed forces. Young people wanting to become engaged in a specific aspect of any of the armed forces sought to be recognized by the roll-specific uniforms for that area. Turning off that inducement, exchanging it for a 'one-size-fits-all' vanilla outfit, choked off their enlistment numbers in a heartbeat. Senior military leaders couldn't get that turned off quick enough. U.S. common uniform? Didn't work for the Canadians and I REALLY don't believe it would work for us!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Victor Pontbriand
0
0
0
Stupid idea
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 N4 Lpo
0
0
0
No way. Love my NWUs.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Staff Officer
0
0
0
I support a standard combat uniform for all the branches. The biggest argument about having distinct uniforms is that it is "tradition". These people forget that before the whole digital camouflage fad, all the branches wore BDUs. Since then the branches have spent tons of money on their service distinct uniforms that don't provide a distinct tactical advantage. With a standard uniform, that money can be spent on more important things. A standard uniform also makes the logistics a lot easier, saving even more money. We work for the people and shouldn't be frivolously spending their money on combat uniforms that don't effectively do their job. If I am in a foxhole getting shot at, I don't care if the uniform I'm wearing shows my service's distinct look. All I care about is if it conceals me so that I'm not a bigger target for the enemy.

With that being said about the combat uniform, I think there should still be service distinct dress uniforms. This is where the argument for tradition is actually valid. If I am in my dress uniform it is a formal occasion and I actually care about pride in my service, as opposed to when I'm getting shot at. Logistically it would still cost more to have service distinct dress uniform but the services are changing their dress uniform as often. This means they aren't spending as much money on development of new uniforms. I think if they tried to get rid of service distinct uniforms for both combat and dress uniforms there would be too much backlash. I think that having a unified combat uniform will solve many of the problems they are trying to fix.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Infantryman
0
0
0
I don't know about this. Considering our different rank structures, I think having different uniforms is a good way to tell what branch you're looking at from a distance, so when you see a bit bird on someone's hat you know what to say to them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt John Taylor
0
0
0
We all wore chocolate chips in DESERT STORM. I hate to sound like a conspiroist, but how long after we all look the same before someone asks the question "why different services?"

I have a great deal of respect for our sister services, but I have more pride in my own, therefore I prefer the separate look.
(0)
Comment
(0)
COL John Hudson
COL John Hudson
>1 y
Chief, on that same line of reasoning...the Congress of the United States, in a Branch hearing, asked the US Air Force General level leadership why the Army used Warrant Officer pilots (cheap) yet the Air Force demanded Commissioned Officers (expensive) to fly their aircraft. The answer was ludicrous...a rambling discourse about how much more talent the pilot had, AF aircraft were much more demanding to fly, and a litany of similar nonsense attempting to convince the Panel how much better AF pilots had to be. The instruments in my helicopter troop carriers and gun ships were exactly the same as those in any AF aircraft flying similar roles. In 1970, the Army sent a number of AH1G Cobra helicopter pilots (Warrant Officer) to Edwards Air Force Base in California to conduct combat trials against AF fast movers. Both types of aircraft were equipped with the same acquisition radars and told to go out and 'shoot' each other down. Results? The Army helicopters hit each and every fast mover and the jets never scored one kill throughout the exercise. In fact, the after-action reports stated the jet jocks never even saw one helicopter during the entire exercise! Go back and read about the "Flying Sergeants" in WWII.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Billy McDonough
0
0
0
Only if it saves money, in textiles these days I am not sure it would.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Joe StMartin
0
0
0
The concept is great, however the problem that occurs is that our working uniforms need to be closely matched to our working environments. I can not imagine any one style, or fabric that would be appropriate to working in a ships engineering pit, on a flight line, a base, a battlefield, And whichever other locations our forces find themselves working in on a day to day basis. The only time that one standard uniform would work would be if we were all working in the same environment.

The issue that arises then becomes the problem of each individual having to keep several different types of uniforms that wouldn't use for years at a time.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Program Technician
0
0
0
I like that each branch has its own identity, however I'm not opposed to wearing the same uniform during deployment, as we should all be wearing the most functional concealment in a combat zone. I also think it is odd now that the Army is getting a new pattern and it is the only non-digital of all the branches. OCP is hands down better than UCP though.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close