Posted on Sep 10, 2016
SSG Robert Burns
23.6K
334
142
18
18
0
D35ae989
I believe there's only one way out of this situation. No one in North Korea wants to be there under this rule. We should all go in, take him out, remove the border and the South Korean President becomes the new Korean president. And now North Korea turns into a modern, contributing, safe, and prosperous nation. Families will finally be reunited and free. Pretty soon we'll be forced into this.
Posted in these groups: Flag of south korea South KoreaNorth korea flag jpg North KoreaKorea Korea
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 47
MSgt Operations Intelligence
31
31
0
2f268b9d
I say just send in Chuck!
(31)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
That's why China leaves them there in place is to punish the United States and Japan. China can say sorry nothing we can do about them while we sit and worry our asses off. They are a rouge country now with Nukes, either arm Japan and South Korea with a few low payload nukes as mutual assured destruction or Nuke them our selves. We should be building a whole new smaller Nuke device to use on these new players like North Korea, Iran and even Pakistan. We are not fighting Russia or China here dealing with smaller land masses to cover need more tactical style strikes available. We don't need Megatons. On a slightly different yet stupid subject we have 50 Nukes in Turkey. They just under went a revolution Coup attempt are we nuts fly them out of there. We have no business having nukes in an unstable Muslim country. We must have holes in our heads. Maybe some stupid rule about keeping nukes in a loadable location for our bombers, but in Turkey really come on guys who’s running this thing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Operations Intelligence
MSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Floyd Williams - Technically speaking, we are still at war with North Korea. All there is an armistice!
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Floyd Williams
MSG Floyd Williams
>1 y
MSgt (Join to see) - You're right there isn't a peace treaty, so a full scale war can start at anytime.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 John Wagner
PO3 John Wagner
>1 y
MSG Jeff Clark - Bullseye!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Pete Kain
22
22
0
Have you ever been there. I have twice and my father before me at the Chosin. It's not just the North Koreans, you have to think about the Chinese too. Screw them and let rot, when the people get fed up enough they will deal with it. The DAMN place is not worth another single American life.
Now if we have to defend South Korea I am in.
(22)
Comment
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
LTC Paul Labrador
>1 y
Honestly, I don't see China jumping in on NK's side anymore....particularly if NK starts the shooting. In fact, I could see Bejing taking pre-emptive action AGAINST NK to stop an all out war. China wants the status quo to be maintained, at least for now. The last thing China wants is a unified, democratic, economic powerhouse on their southern border giving Chinese citizens ideas about democracy....
(2)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
wehy anyone would think that millions of deatshs including tens of thousands of American deaths is beyinf me and I am not exaggerating the kind of numbers involed at all. Seoul is one of the largest Cities on the earth and it is within ranges of approximate 6000 pieces of heavy artillery., The Defenses on both side are fortified an may fortified enough that anything other than heavy precision weapons are not not bothering with, the terrain absolutely sucks for modern warfare and gives great advantages to the defender.

Then if out side get a real upper hand nuke start popping since we are dealing with a absolutely mad culture and thus Japanese civilians get added to the death toll

I served three tours the and brought back a wife 34 years ago. I am still with her. From her parents and older sibling and friends i have come to understand somewhat the nightmare that the civil population went though. Not the least is things like fleeing south to flee from the war, returning home than fleeing south again when the war went badly. All with children and on foot on the edges and sometimes in the middle of a combat zone, The best American General in US history had it right "War is all hell" . Anyone that actually plans on a short victorious war should be rewarded for that thought by being taken out to a wall and gut-shot as a lesson. Diplomats should and warriors do pay horrible prices for that particular kind of stupidity.

Wars are so clean in video games and in the movies aren't they.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
SFC Pete Kain China is less likely to get involved if the incursion is strictly limited to South Korean forces - and not US forces.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Pete Kain
SFC Pete Kain
>1 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - Less likely or are you sure?
It's matters.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Retired
10
10
0
How about not only no but he'll no. We have our troops spread out too thin and it would cost way too much not only monetarily but in a large human toll as well.

The United States needs to stop worrying so much about the international stage and start sweeping its own porch.
(10)
Comment
(0)
MSG Jeff Clark
MSG Jeff Clark
>1 y
and we are getting far to lean
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
That's right why waste the young men. If we are that mad bomb them or nuke them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
WW3. Is it time for the World to liberate North Korea from this crazy Regime and get back to having just one Korea?
See Results
SSG Program Control Manager
7
7
0
We have no right to wage war on a nation because we don't like their government. If they ever decide to invade South Korea, the government will be replaced... until then, we should just leave them alone.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
Well although I loath all Muslims and I am pissed at the Pakistanis for hiding Bin Laden . The Pakistani's are not currently at war with us, at least for now. While North Korea is and we only have an armistice in place and the war can begin again any day. I do not want to loose 1 man to them, but I would gladly sit back with missiles and Stealth bombers and blow them into the next stone age. Also Pakistan is in mutual assured destruction with India. That is our other option give a limited number of small Uranium or Plutonium nukes to South Korea and Japan to defend themselves against the North with mutually assured destruction. I prefer bombing them back into the stone age.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
SSgt Brad Becker - "Loath all Muslims"? Really?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
Yes I have been at war with one radical Muslim Group or another almost straight for 37 years. Iran hostage, to Beirut, USS Stark, Gulf war, Somalia, USS. Cole, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, ISIS, Syria, Now Iran again. People have been born and died and have never know a time with out fear of Muslim terror. So yes I hate them all. I have a lot of injured friends. From these last 2 wars. I have never meant 1 that I trusted with my back in combat not even the examples I meant in the Marines. Always trying to tell me how peaceful the Muslims are while I am packing my gear for the newest hot spot. Probably not like that now, but a lot refused to fight in the Gulf war. Even had a Warrant officer refuse to fight against other Muslims did not get kicked out and even got a promotion latter.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Mobile Gun System (Mgs) Gunner
PFC (Join to see)
8 y
SSG (Join to see) I agree well said, if we have to overthrow every government that doesn't share our perceptions on governing that would be 80% of the world. What's statue of limitations?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Vet Technician
6
6
0
I want to make sure that I am understanding what you are proposing.

You propose to send in a coalition (I would hope) of world force, into a Nuclear Armed nation to take out a leader that purportedly kills members of his cabinet for nodding during speeches, and kills family members in his military leadership? This action would be backed by a nation's military who has been stretched for 15 years of deployments and now, more recently a shredding of numbers? This is on top of a desert warfare mentality that would need to rapidly switch it's focus back to conditions that are more common on the Korean Peninsula.

Additionally, where would the PRK allies fall in on this. Specifically China who might see this as a threat to their security and interests, as well as our growing tension with Russia.

I agree that PRK is a big irritation, and perhaps the answer is targeted, precision attacks and increased sanctions. But no, I don't think the situation has grown quite to the place where an invasion is warranted. I am quite sure that PRK, more specifically Kim, will readily use whatever NBC arsenal it has. This action would cause immense casualties.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Burns
SSG Robert Burns
>1 y
The question is where will the casualties be. In North Korea or wherever they start launching missiles once they can?
(0)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
>1 y
Missiles are not their most threatening weapons, SSG Robert Burns. As best I can recall, there are something like a dozen major dams in the North on rivers which flow south. A major flood hitting Seoul would almost has a much higher hit probability than any missile, and would be effectively unstoppable.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
Yes that's what he said, it sounds dumber the more I say it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Yeoman
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
1LT William Clardy - Some small rivers from the north flow into the south, while the largest Korean river (Han) flows north. The Han river in Seoul originates in South Korea and flows north to the South/North Korean border, which empties out to the Yellow Sea. Little damage would be done by flooding. Next time please check your facts before posting a opinion or comment.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Charles Temm
5
5
0
Not only no but hell no.

No more nation building or toppling dictators. Let the Norks settle their own problems. When N. Korea finally does implode, let the South Koreans move in to clean things up just like when the Wall fell in Germany
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Dan Fuhr
4
4
0
War is serious business, and almost always harder than it looks at the beginning. Before anyone advocates going to war in Korea, we should ask ourselves whether North Korea is a real threat to the US' survival (vital national interest). If the answer is yes, then we absolutely should kick their@ss. If not, then let's not get our sons and daughters killed just to get Kim Jung Un and his ilk out of the way. Barring a clear and present danger of the NKPA dropping nukes on us, I say the answer is no. But maybe giving them Rodman is a good compromise.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
Smart Col very Smart.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
9 y
I apologize to every Veteran who had to go to Iraq after 2002 as we did not take care of that business like we should have in 1990 when we had 500,000 men in country. We should have annihilated them. I kicked the ground when they ended the war, we had them whipped. They where 100% crushed we could have made them get on their knees and beg.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC "Chip" Ernest Gross
LTC "Chip" Ernest Gross
9 y
I totally agree with Dan Fuhr, who is a comrade-in-arms and friend going back almost 20 years. Remember what we learned (hopefully) in Iraq: you break it, you own it (apologies to Colin Powell). Unless they are a serious immediate threat, we need to stay out of there!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Richard C.
4
4
0
Short answer - No! You are making an assumption that "no one in North Korea wants to be there".
The level of brainwashing accomplished with the general populace is unprecedented and rivals or exceeds that in George Orwell's "1984". Think about this - During WWII, thousands of Okinawan citizens committed suicide by jumping off cliffs (parents threw their children off or held them while they jumped) because their military told them the Americans would rape, torture and slaughter every man, woman and child they captured. That happened after probably less than 10 years of brainwashing. The North Koreans have been getting more aggressive brainwashing reinforced by torture, deprivation and murder for 60 years more or less, and most of them absolutely believe what their government tells them. We don't want to get in the middle of that unless/until we have no choice.
(4)
Comment
(0)
CAPT Hiram Patterson
CAPT Hiram Patterson
>1 y
Not certain about Okinawa (probably a lesser extent but I haven't read anything on it) but they did it on Saipan for certain.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Charles Temm
SFC Charles Temm
>1 y
and Tinian
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
>1 y
One of the smartest things I have read on here.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
LTC Paul Labrador
>1 y
Well, considering the recent uptick in NK defections and from intel gathered from folks who managed to get out, I think we tend to give the regime a tad too much credit on the brainwashing piece. Are there hardcore elements that will go down with the ship? Yes. But it also seems that most folks in NK tend to know that they are in a bad way, that their leadership is crazy...but they simply can't do anything about it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Dr Ronnie Manns
4
4
0
Considering our record on "liberation of other countries" we may wish to refrain from trying that again, what it does appear to be for me is China getting tired of financially holding up North Korea and being responsible for any act they perform so the Iran Nuclear Deal seems like a decent fit for North Korea. Instead of bombs, bullets and bandages, let's try diplomacy and if diplomacy fails we have not lost anything especially lives.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
9 y
Well I was in the Artillery for 20 years. I was in the war in the Gulf I fired as many rounds as my officers would allow me too. I was the operations chef in charge of an 8 gun yes stupid 8 155 mm battery. That was an Idea that went away almost as quickly as it started. Stupid. But any ways I have never regretted one round. Only wish I had fired more sleep like a baby at night. You see in indirect war fare like Artillery or Bombers dropping bomb you do not see the enemy. So its not an issue. I say the B-52 dropping thousands of bombs in the Distance on Iraqis it was awesome. First you see the flashes at night it lights up the sky like some kind of giant lighting storm, then the ground feels like an earth quake under your feet finally you can hear the rumble. It was beautiful. That is when we first developing smart bombs and still did carpet bombing I was 20 miles or more away. I can tell you the Iraqis must have been peeing their pants. It spooked some of my men and as I saw it was 20 - 40 miles away. See speed of light is faster, the the ground is a better conductor then the air. The B-52 is an awesome weapon.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Dr Ronnie Manns
Cpl Dr Ronnie Manns
9 y
SSgt Brad Becker - Well you are a better man than me because the thought that I was the catalyst behind lose of life bothers me.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Brad Becker
SSgt Brad Becker
9 y
I would not send in one single ground troop unless we needed a special forces team to spot smart rounds on TGT modern warfare that maybe able to do with drones and satellites Just sit back and blow them all away with Missiles and Aircraft. Don't waste the man power. Not better then any one else, just saying indirect ware fare is not got the same face on it. It has never bothered me the only Iraqis I saw where dead that’s the way I like them. Laying in the desert rotting. We drove by some killed by aircraft or artillery during the war. When moving positions. I saw a few killed in the distance in a few small tank battles watched their bodies fly through the air when their tanks cooked off. Saw some bunkers that they must have been dead because after awhile they where not shooting back any more and the armor drove by. Some stinky tanks with dead Iraqis in them next to our position. Never got to use my 9mm or M16A2. Saw about 3000 Pows if added up at different times. My section captured 4 who we disarmed one morning at sun up. I saw one who was gut shot after a fire fight with Marine weapons Company. They tried to make a stand in a block building. Weapons used 50’s, MK19’s every thing they had the building was riddled. Only 2 survived the one was gut shot. Weapons platoon had a hummer overloaded to the point they where about to fall out of captured Iraqi weapons. nice war over all. I am sorry to every one who had to go back in 2002 or after because we where not allowed to kill more the first time when we had 500,000 men on the battle field. Only time since WW2 we had 3 divisions of Marines in the same theater. 1st and 2nd on shore 3rd on the water. With 2/3 of the 4th division reservists filling 1st and 2nd divisions, we made about 3 full divisions. 1st and 2nd each gave an RLT to 3rd Mar Div. joined by the Brigade from Hawaii stayed on ships. 1st and 2nd where each given an RLT from fourth making them 2/3 active 1/3 Reservists, The where broken up and added to Battalions like my Battalion was 2 Batteries of Active and 1 reserve battery and active BN Hq.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC "Chip" Ernest Gross
LTC "Chip" Ernest Gross
9 y
Smart man!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Jessica Bautista
4
4
0
Any actual Koreans have an opinion here?
(4)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Lester Anderson
Cpl Lester Anderson
>1 y
Very good idea.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close