Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Feb 16, 2016
SSG Lon Watson
154K
839
330
170
170
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 147
LTC Substitute Teacher
2
2
0
There is no doubt that the Marines, have and always had and will have the reputation of the toughest service. I do think the Army has moved in the right direction. Most of the soldiers I encounter today seem to have more of the "can-do" spirit and proud of what they do. When I see them it reinforces my pride in being a retired soldier. Just my impression. We a all a team that keep our country secure. Marines and special op troops obviously have tougher training, but the Air Force computer geek is still put of the team; (s)he may not have seen the physical rigors, but, nevertheless has the dedication to use his/her talent to serve our county and giving up better pay and probably more stable hours as a result.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Lon Watson
SSG Lon Watson
10 y
This is true sir. In fact the army just changed its POI. Drill and ceremony is back on the training schedule. They overhauled what soldiers learn.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Eugene Harless
2
2
0
I had the privledge to attend BNCOC and attend some Marine Corps Schools on an Army base. I witnessed some of the Basic training routines of the Army and attended BNCOC with some of the Drill Sergeants.
The Marine's Boot Camp indoctrinates as well as trains recruits in basic skills. The discipline. attention to detail and sense of urgency is much higher.
What is the differences in the services? Here is my spin on it. The top 10% of all the services Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines are all on par with each other as far as professionalism and being elite in their own way. The bottom 10% are equally worthless pieces of shit.
It is that other 80% where The Corps shines. In the other services the 80% consider themselves Billy, Bobby and Sue just marking time and doing a job. In the Corps they know they are above all a Marine.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Lon Watson
SSG Lon Watson
10 y
I can't argue with that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Eugene Harless
1stSgt Eugene Harless
10 y
When I was a DI I always Thrashed the recruits for the smallest things,, Shoes not aligned under their racks, pillow edges or display towell folds facing the wrong way. After a few weeks I finally let them in on the method of my madness. I had a recruit pushing because his shower shoes werent in the right order.
I asked him what his MOS was supposed to be. He said He was going to be in Avionics. I told him "Not if I can help it,,, why the fuck should the Marine Corps trust your dumb ass to work on a 30 Million Dollar Plane when you can't take care of a 50 cent shower shoe, dickhead?"
At that point the recruits started understanding the purpose behind the fuck fuck games.
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Donald Murphy
PO3 Donald Murphy
10 y
You do get in to that mentality. And at the first time of emergency you do what you needed to do and remembered that it was that mean-ass DI's treatment that allowed you to do the best job ever and save your ass/ship/life.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Angel C.
2
2
0
First, long of a post so long response. I don't buy any of this as an Army thing or Army wrong. This is a SSG Lon Watson thing. From your foxhole as a Chem NCO now picking up a Marine Corps book and questioning why the Army can't be like the Marines. Why would Chuck Norris wanna be like Bruce Lee? They're both awesome in their own way. I don't know what kind of Army basic training you went to in the 80s or you're referring to but my basic training in 91 with C 1-26 INF at Dix was hell and we didn't become Soldiers until graduation. And we damn sure were tough, proud and disciplined. Additionally as an Ordnance Soldier all our professional developmental schools were extremely challenging academically, physically, and in uniform and barracks standards. AIT, BNCOC and ANCOC all had barracks SOPs that were strictly enforced. Even after I went Warrant the Ordance Corps expectations continued to grow. Just being Airborne and even a Jumpmaster doesn't qualify you to make these comments. What kind of unit you're in and what's your mission there paints a better picture of your experience. I know many units in BRAGG especially in the 82nd ABN that are at a very minimum just as tough or tougher than any Marine unit out there. Yes the Army doesn't do a very good job now at indoctrinating (brainwashing) recruits but that's why it's important to have strong first line NCOs and leaders at permanent party units so they can build on what was started in basic. We are a huge organization with immense versatility and lots of moving parts. And we're the first ones to get cut or surged. I wish every unit in the Army was more like the 82nd ABN, 101st ABN, 4th ID, and 10th Mtn and that all new Soldiers would start there so they can "be all they can be" and be Army strong!
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Lon Watson
SSG Lon Watson
10 y
If you read my comments, I excluded Airborne, Infantry, and the like from what I said. Also I wasn't talking about or insulting your experience in 1991. I was talking about NOW. Truthfully the 1990s were the golden age of basic training for the Army and you should be proud (and are) to be a part of it. My basic in the 1980s was tough for me, but anything would have been tough for me then. But the truth be told my basic was a bit lame compared to the 1990s. It was 1982 and we had a lot of vietnam era NCOs some good, some not good. As I observed in the 90s the quality of soldier was raising. I just think right now the warrior spirit is lacking.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW4 Angel C.
CW4 Angel C.
10 y
Thanks for the clarification SSG Lon Watson
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Lon Watson
2
2
0
Wait until you read my women in combat arms and SOF article! It will be as thought provoking as this one! I'll probably get more hate mail than I already have.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Lon Watson
SSG Lon Watson
10 y
Sgt Richard Buckner - so you felt after I spoke up for the Marine Corps that this was fantasy fiction?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPO Greg Frazho
2
2
0
Very in-depth and very insightful think-piece on the warrior ethos, Staff Sgt. A lot of good nuggets to chew on. But at the risk of oversimplifying the matter, consider this: Marines are essentially the shock troops of the U.S. military arsenal. The Army, which used to hold its own in that company, has become not so much the knife edge of the blade that swings, so to speak, as they are the rest of the sword that comes thereafter. The former is a fighting force, the latter is now an occupation force, although I would argue there are exceptions. Whereas Marines are, or were, by their very nature expeditionary, the Army, not least due to its size (as you mention above) is not in the business of expeditions. That translates into a much more visceral raison d'être in the case of our beloved USMC.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Jonathan Schmidt
2
2
0
The sole reason the Marine Corp can do that is because the other branches give them the luxury of not needing to train legions of support personnel. Hell, they don't even train their own medics, they have to go to the Navy for those.

What the Marines do is train infantry, and they are good at it. But you cannot equate a training program that has to turn out all kinds of personnel ranging from infantry to support personnel to one that has the pure luxury of training infantry.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jonathan Schmidt
SPC Jonathan Schmidt
10 y
The point is that the Army has more support staff than the Marine Corp has staff at all. When you have to run an organization that much larger you lose the ability to be as picky. And that comes with a price.

Also, being the largest military branch by a large margin means that whenever someone in leadership decides to perform a social experiment it ends up being shoved onto the Army first. Just wait, the Corp's turn is coming shortly.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl D L Parker
Cpl D L Parker
10 y
I don't think the size of the force matters. In basic you are teaching the fundamentals. The MOS things comes later. I hear bootcamp for Army infantry is different, if so why can't the Army train everyone the same.
(0)
Reply
(0)
GySgt Infantry Unit Leader
GySgt (Join to see)
10 y
Out of 186k Marines only about 25k of that is Infantry all the rest is support in some way or another. Just so people know where I numbers stand.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Sales & Proposals Manager Gas Turbine Products
2
2
0
Great read...great points...no additional commentary required. Just going to stand here clapping and basking in the "true" doled out here.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Mark McMiller
2
2
0
I'd say that sums it up pretty well.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Eric Blue
1
1
0
While I agree with your research, the ONLY thing I disagree with is Army reception. And the ONLY reason for that is because when I came through Ft. Sill, there were a few prior-service Marines as my drill sergeants. I FRICKIN' LOVED IT! Reminded me of a slightly nicer version of the boot camp stories my grandfathers told me from Montford Point. And ALL of the drill sergeants I had in Bravo Battery, 1/40 Field Artillery were on the same page, playing the same tune, regardless of where they came from. I came through BCT in 2000. By 2002, I noticed a HUGE difference between those I came through with and those making their way into the Army. I may have been one of the last of a great era. Beyond that, amigo, well done! I really appreciate you sharing this with us!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC John Tacetta
1
1
0
What's up with that trooper in front of the firing line? Is he Marine or Army?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close